Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLM vs COF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
SLM vs COF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $4.46B | $119.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.11B | $69.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $745M | $2.45B |
| Gross Margin | 53.1% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 31.9% | 3.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 9.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.86B | $51.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4.24B | $57.43B |
SLM vs COF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLM Corporation (SLM) | 100 | 297.2 | +197.2% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 284.2 | +184.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLM vs COF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.13, yield 15.0%
- 274.8% 10Y total return vs COF's 207.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, current ratio 0.28x
COF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth -65.2%
- NIM 6.4% vs SLM's 5.0%
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs SLM's 4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs SLM's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 9.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs COF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 15.0% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs COF's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.6% vs SLM's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs COF's 0.4% |
SLM vs COF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLM vs COF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COF is the larger business by revenue, generating $69.3B annually — 22.3x SLM's $3.1B. SLM is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $69.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $599M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $745M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $646M | $27.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.1% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +22.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, SLM trades at a 86% valuation discount to COF's 48.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLM's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COF's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $119.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.1B | $113.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.51x | 47.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.25x | 9.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.11x | 15.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.44x | 1.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.90x | 0.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.76x | 4.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLM delivers a 31.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLM's 2.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLM scores 7/9 vs COF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +31.0% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | +1.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.39x | 0.45x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | -$6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.2B | $57.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.9B | $51.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | 0.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in COF five years ago would be worth $13,181 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,139 for SLM. Over the past 12 months, COF leads with a +5.6% total return vs SLM's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COF at 31.2% vs SLM's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.3% | -21.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.0% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.5% | +125.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | +31.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.8% | +207.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +31.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLM and COF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLM is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COF currently trades 74.5% from its 52-week high vs SLM's 64.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.97 | $259.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.77 | $174.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.4% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 44.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SLM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLM as "Buy" and COF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.1% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 30.9% for SLM (target: $30). For income investors, SLM offers the higher dividend yield at 15.00% vs COF's 1.69%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $267.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 56 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.38 | $3.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.3% | +3.4% |
SLM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COF leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SLM vs COF: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLM or COF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for SLM Corporation (SLM). SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SLM Corporation (SLM) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLM or COF?
On trailing P/E, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the cheapest at 6.
5x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, SLM Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLM or COF?
Over the past 5 years, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) delivered a total return of +31.
8%, compared to +21. 4% for SLM Corporation (SLM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLM returned +274. 8% versus COF's +207. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLM or COF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SLM Corporation (SLM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
13β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 40% more volatile than SLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 2% for SLM Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLM or COF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus 4. 1% for SLM Corporation (SLM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SLM Corporation grew EPS 29. 1% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLM or COF?
SLM Corporation (SLM) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
0% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLM leads at 31. 9% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLM leads at 53. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SLM or COF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SLM Corporation (SLM) trades at 7.
2x forward P/E versus 9. 8x for Capital One Financial Corporation — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 1% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — SLM or COF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SLM Corporation (SLM) offers the highest yield at 15. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Capital One Financial Corporation (COF).
09Is SLM or COF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SLM Corporation (SLM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
13), 15. 0% yield, +274. 8% 10Y return). Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLM: +274. 8%, COF: +207. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SLM and COF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLM is a small-cap deep-value stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.