Insurance - Brokers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLQT vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SLQT vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Brokers | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $201M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.64B | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 69.8% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 85.7x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $416M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $32M | $25M |
SLQT vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLQT vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 15.5% revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
- 5.7% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.0%
MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66
- 126.9% 10Y total return vs SLQT's -95.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.5% revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 85.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs SLQT's 4.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs SLQT's -57.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.0% |
SLQT vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLQT vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 12.1x MNSB's $136M. MNSB is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$62M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.8% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.5% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SLQT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 84% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLQT's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $201M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $584M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 85.71x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.57x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.36x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLQT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNSB scores 5/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.7% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.72x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $384M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $416M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.11x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNSB at 6.7% vs SLQT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.8% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.6% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.7% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.96x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.7% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLQT as "Hold" and MNSB as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNSB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SLQT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
SLQT vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLQT or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLQT or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLQT or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately 195% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLQT or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.
(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 106. 7% for SelectQuote, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLQT or MNSB?
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSB leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or MNSB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SLQT or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
(MNSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +126. 9% 10Y return). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSB: +126. 9%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLQT and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.