Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLQT vs MNSB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.

Insurance - Brokers

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$201M
5Y Perf.-95.9%
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$176M
5Y Perf.+77.2%

SLQT vs MNSB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLQT logoSLQT
MNSB logoMNSB
IndustryInsurance - BrokersBanks - Regional
Market Cap$201M$176M
Revenue (TTM)$1.64B$136M
Net Income (TTM)$73M$16M
Gross Margin69.8%54.4%
Operating Margin3.5%14.0%
Forward P/E85.7x10.4x
Total Debt$416M$70M
Cash & Equiv.$32M$25M

SLQT vs MNSBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLQT
MNSB
StockMay 20May 26Return
SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT)1004.1-95.9%
MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB)100177.2+77.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLQT vs MNSB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MNSB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. SelectQuote, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLQT
SelectQuote, Inc.
The Insurance Pick

SLQT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 106.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
  • 15.5% revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
  • 5.7% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.0%
Best for: growth exposure
MNSB
MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

MNSB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.66
  • 126.9% 10Y total return vs SLQT's -95.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 32.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSLQT logoSLQT15.5% revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
ValueMNSB logoMNSBLower P/E (10.4x vs 85.7x)
Quality / MarginsMNSB logoMNSB11.5% margin vs SLQT's 4.5%
Stability / SafetyMNSB logoMNSBBeta 0.66 vs SLQT's 1.96, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MNSB logoMNSB+26.4% vs SLQT's -57.6%
Efficiency (ROA)SLQT logoSLQT5.7% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs 5.0%

SLQT vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLQTSelectQuote, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
52.1%$798M
Pharmacy
47.6%$729M
Product and Service, Other
0.3%$4M
MNSBMainStreet Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2025
Core Banking Segment
100.0%$134M

SLQT vs MNSB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMNSBLAGGINGSLQT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

SLQT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 12.1x MNSB's $136M. MNSB is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLQT's 4.5%.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.6B$136M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$63M$23M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$73M$16M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$62M$13M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+69.8%+54.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.5%+14.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.5%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-3.8%+7.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-114.5%+120.9%
MNSB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SLQT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 13.4x trailing earnings, MNSB trades at a 84% valuation discount to SLQT's 85.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLQT's 6.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.6x.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Market CapShares × price$201M$176M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$584M$221M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS85.71x13.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.57x11.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.13x1.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.36x0.82x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.57x
SLQT leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SLQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SLQT delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLQT's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNSB scores 5/9 vs SLQT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%+7.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.3%+5.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.7%+0.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.72x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$384M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$25M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$416M$70M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.11x0.31x
SLQT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MNSB five years ago would be worth $12,056 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $387 for SLQT. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs SLQT's -57.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNSB at 6.7% vs SLQT's -7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-16.8%+19.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-57.6%+26.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-19.7%+21.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.1%+20.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.8%+126.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-7.1%+6.7%
MNSB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MNSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLQT's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 93.4% from its 52-week high vs SLQT's 40.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.96x0.66x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.80$25.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.56$17.86
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.7%+93.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10071.750.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.2M58K
MNSB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates SLQT as "Hold" and MNSB as "Hold".

MetricSLQT logoSLQTSelectQuote, Inc.MNSB logoMNSBMainStreet Bancsh…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts111
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises12
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

MNSB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SLQT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).

Best OverallMainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLQT vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLQT or MNSB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is the stronger pick with 15. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLQT or MNSB?

On trailing P/E, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus SelectQuote, Inc. at 85. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLQT or MNSB?

Over the past 5 years, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) delivered a total return of +20. 6%, compared to -96. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNSB returned +126. 9% versus SLQT's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLQT or MNSB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus SelectQuote, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning SLQT is approximately 195% more volatile than MNSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 72% for SelectQuote, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLQT or MNSB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SelectQuote, Inc.

(SLQT) is pulling ahead at 15. 5% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 106. 7% for SelectQuote, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLQT or MNSB?

MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 5% net margin versus 3. 1% for SelectQuote, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MNSB leads at 14. 0% versus 4. 5% for SLQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MNSB leads at 54. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SLQT or MNSB?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is SLQT or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc.

(MNSB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), +126. 9% 10Y return). SelectQuote, Inc. (SLQT) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNSB: +126. 9%, SLQT: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SLQT and MNSB?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SLQT is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SLQT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MNSB

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SLQT and MNSB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SLQT: 5.6% · MNSB: -1.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(SLQT: 4.5% · MNSB: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SLQT: 85.7x · MNSB: 13.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.