Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $698K | $104M | $9.63B | $5.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $-92K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-43M | $-327M | $-464M |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.7x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $222K | $15M | $110K | $98K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $55M | $357M | $714M |
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Salarius Pharmaceut… (SLRX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Aldeyra Therapeutic… (ALDX) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 59.8 | -40.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 59.6 | -40.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.10
- 5.2% margin vs PRAX's 2.4%
- Beta 1.10 vs PRAX's 1.55
ALDX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 3.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -100.0%, EPS growth -32.0%
- +7.7% vs SLRX's -93.1%
- -40.2% ROA vs SLRX's -82.1%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.6% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs PRAX's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs SLRX's -93.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.2% ROA vs SLRX's -82.1% |
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
SLRX leads 1 • ALDX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLRX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLRX and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | -$92,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$45M | -$357M | -$487M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$43M | -$327M | -$464M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$40M | -$283M | -$423M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +84.1% | +48.0% | +2.7% | +19.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SLRX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $697,790 | $104M | $9.6B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $65M | $9.3B | $4.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -1.84x | -24.72x | -9.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.71x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.45x | 8.54x | 5.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-118 for SLRX. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALDX's 0.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLRX scores 3/9 vs ALDX's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -117.8% | -87.7% | -43.0% | -47.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -82.1% | -55.5% | -40.2% | -44.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.7% | -65.0% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -168.7% | -56.7% | -49.3% | -66.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.22x | 0.00x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$39M | -$357M | -$714M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $55M | $357M | $714M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $221,866 | $15M | $110,000 | $98,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -21.72x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SLRX. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs SLRX's -93.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs SLRX's -85.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.3% | -63.0% | +16.4% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -93.1% | -13.9% | +775.0% | +96.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -83.8% | +1976.5% | +40.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -86.1% | -20.8% | +62.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -72.1% | -20.1% | +173.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.8% | -45.5% | +174.9% | +12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLRX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLRX is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SLRX's 2.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.45x | 1.55x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.65 | $6.18 | $356.00 | $30.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.52 | $1.07 | $35.18 | $13.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.1% | +28.0% | +93.6% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 42.9 | 55.6 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 79K | 3.6M | 378K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 459.0% upside for ALDX (target: $10) vs 63.3% for PRAX (target: $544).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.67 | $544.40 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 16 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SLRX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SLRX vs ALDX vs PRAX vs IMVT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(ALDX) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SLRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +173. 6% versus SLRX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SLRX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 10β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 41% more volatile than SLRX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 22% for Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
grew EPS -32. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1522. 7% for Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT?
Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SLRX) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Immunovant, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLRX leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLRX leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALDX: 459.
0% to $9. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SLRX or ALDX or PRAX or IMVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Salarius Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SLRX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 10)). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLRX: -100. 0%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLRX and ALDX and PRAX and IMVT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.