Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLSR
Solaris Resources Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.68B
5Y Perf.+367.1%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$9.46B
5Y Perf.+432.4%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$87.11B
5Y Perf.+288.3%
TECK
Teck Resources Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$29.25B
5Y Perf.+427.3%

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLSR logoSLSR
HBM logoHBM
FCX logoFCX
TECK logoTECK
IndustryOther Precious MetalsCopperCopperIndustrial Materials
Market Cap$1.68B$9.46B$87.11B$29.25B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$2.22B$26.42B$12.41B
Net Income (TTM)$-58M$570M$2.73B$1.85B
Gross Margin32.5%27.8%30.3%
Operating Margin41.4%27.8%23.9%
Forward P/E15.3x22.4x13.0x
Total Debt$50M$1.09B$11.50B$10.39B
Cash & Equiv.$32M$568M$3.35B$5.01B

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLSR
HBM
FCX
TECK
StockAug 20May 26Return
Solaris Resources I… (SLSR)100467.1+367.1%
Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)100532.4+432.4%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100388.3+288.3%
Teck Resources Limi… (TECK)100527.3+427.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HBM leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. Teck Resources Limited is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. SLSR and FCX also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLSR
Solaris Resources Inc.
The Defensive Choice

SLSR is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 1.01 vs HBM's 1.91
Best for: stability
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
The Growth Play

HBM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
  • 25.8% margin vs SLSR's -6.8%
  • +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
  • 9.8% ROA vs SLSR's -99.7%, ROIC 12.0% vs -444.5%
Best for: growth exposure
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Income Pick

FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 1.0%
  • 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

TECK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs HBM's 5.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
  • Beta 1.73, yield 0.6%, current ratio 2.54x
  • 18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTECK logoTECK18.6% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueTECK logoTECKLower P/E (13.0x vs 22.4x)
Quality / MarginsHBM logoHBM25.8% margin vs SLSR's -6.8%
Stability / SafetySLSR logoSLSRBeta 1.01 vs HBM's 1.91
DividendsFCX logoFCX1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs HBM's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HBM logoHBM+219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
Efficiency (ROA)HBM logoHBM9.8% ROA vs SLSR's -99.7%, ROIC 12.0% vs -444.5%

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLSRSolaris Resources Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HBMHudbay Minerals Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M
TECKTeck Resources Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHBMLAGGINGTECK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FCX and SLSR operate at a comparable scale, with $26.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. HBM is the more profitable business, keeping 25.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$2.2B$26.4B$12.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$92M$1.4B$9.6B$4.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$58M$570M$2.7B$1.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$33M$215M$6.2B$482M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.5%+27.8%+30.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+41.4%+27.8%+23.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.8%+10.3%+14.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+9.7%+23.6%+3.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.0%+12.2%+72.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+43.3%+5.1%+154.2%+128.8%
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — HBM and TECK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 16.3x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HBM's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TECK's 12.3x.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$9.5B$87.1B$29.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.7B$10.0B$95.3B$33.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-21.47x16.34x39.88x29.29x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.31x22.41x12.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.33x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.77x11.16x12.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.30x3.38x3.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.93x2.84x1.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF47.82x78.05x
Evenly matched — HBM and TECK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HBM and FCX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

HBM delivers a 19.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SLSR. HBM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TECK's 0.40x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TECK scores 6/9 vs SLSR's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.5%+19.2%+8.9%+7.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-99.7%+9.8%+4.7%+4.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.4%+12.0%+12.8%+4.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-145.1%+11.3%+12.4%+4.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–91556
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.34x0.37x0.40x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$18M$524M$8.1B$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$32M$568M$3.4B$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$50M$1.1B$11.5B$10.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-9.10x13.44x17.68x4.16x
Evenly matched — HBM and FCX each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HBM five years ago would be worth $25,920 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,745 for SLSR. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+28.7%+18.7%+17.3%+26.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+133.0%+219.0%+65.3%+79.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.0%+350.8%+70.7%+40.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+7.5%+159.2%+44.3%+147.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+362.8%+552.2%+507.7%+599.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.6%+65.2%+19.5%+12.0%
HBM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SLSR and TECK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SLSR is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs HBM's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.91x1.79x1.73x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$11.43$28.74$70.97$63.97
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.69$7.42$35.15$30.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.3%+83.0%+85.4%+95.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.754.049.162.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded106K5.3M15.4M3.9M
Evenly matched — SLSR and TECK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SLSR as "Buy", HBM as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", TECK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for SLSR (target: $16) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, FCX offers the higher dividend yield at 0.99% vs TECK's 0.60%.

MetricSLSR logoSLSRSolaris Resources…HBM logoHBMHudbay Minerals I…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.00$10.34$67.00$64.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts2204126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+1.0%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises050
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01$0.60$0.50
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.1%+2.5%
FCX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HBM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FCX leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallHudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLSR vs HBM vs FCX vs TECK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

Over the past 5 years, Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) delivered a total return of +159. 2%, compared to +7. 5% for Solaris Resources Inc. (SLSR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TECK returned +599. 3% versus SLSR's +362. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solaris Resources Inc.

(SLSR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 89% more volatile than SLSR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 40% for Teck Resources Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to -62. 1% for Solaris Resources Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HBM leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

Hudbay Minerals Inc.

(HBM) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Solaris Resources Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HBM leads at 25. 5% versus 0. 0% for SLSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HBM leads at 29. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13.

0x forward P/E versus 22. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLSR: 58. 6% to $16. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK?

In this comparison, FCX (1.

0% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SLSR, HBM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SLSR or HBM or FCX or TECK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

6% yield, +599. 3% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TECK: +599. 3%, HBM: +552. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SLSR and HBM and FCX and TECK?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SLSR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock. FCX, TECK pay a dividend while SLSR, HBM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SLSR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HBM

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FCX

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TECK

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.