Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SLXN
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.92B
5Y Perf.+227.1%
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.18B
5Y Perf.-84.7%
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-38.9%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$297M
5Y Perf.-19.0%

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SLXN logoSLXN
ARWR logoARWR
SRPT logoSRPT
NTLA logoNTLA
EDIT logoEDIT
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$2M$10.92B$2.18B$1.62B$297M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$622M$2.18B$68M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-12M$-301M$65M$-413M$-160M
Gross Margin85.1%34.4%-25.6%
Operating Margin-35.7%-1.9%-6.5%
Forward P/E6.9x
Total Debt$468K$366M$1.04B$93M$18M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$227M$801M$155M$147M

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDITLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SLXN
ARWR
SRPT
NTLA
EDIT
StockAug 24May 26Return
Silexion Therapeuti… (SLXN)1000.3-99.7%
Arrowhead Pharmaceu… (ARWR)100327.1+227.1%
Sarepta Therapeutic… (SRPT)10015.3-84.7%
Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA)10061.1-38.9%
Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT)10081.0-19.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SLXN
Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

SLXN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ARWR
Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Income Pick

ARWR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.81
  • Rev growth 232.6%, EPS growth 99.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 50.5%
  • 12.5% 10Y total return vs SRPT's 18.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 72.8%, current ratio 4.86x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SRPT
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

SRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 3.0% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
  • 1.9% ROA vs SLXN's -144.7%
Best for: quality and efficiency
NTLA
Intellia Therapeutics, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

NTLA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, EDIT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARWR logoARWR232.6% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsSRPT logoSRPT3.0% margin vs NTLA's -6.1%
Stability / SafetyARWR logoARWRBeta 1.81 vs EDIT's 2.52
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)ARWR logoARWR+496.9% vs SLXN's -96.5%
Efficiency (ROA)SRPT logoSRPT1.9% ROA vs SLXN's -144.7%

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SLXNSilexion Therapeutics Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SRPTSarepta Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NTLAIntellia Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

EDITEditas Medicine, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$41M

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLARWRLAGGINGEDIT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SRPT and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. SRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTLA's -6.1%. On growth, NTLA holds the edge at +78.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$622M$2.2B$68M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$12M-$203M-$6M-$431M$0
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$12M-$301M$65M-$413M-$160M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M-$51M$107M-$396M-$166M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+85.1%+34.4%-25.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-35.7%-1.9%-6.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-48.4%+3.0%-6.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.2%+4.9%-5.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-86.4%-1.9%+78.8%-151.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.4%-133.8%+162.6%+34.6%+105.5%
SRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — SLXN and ARWR and SRPT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Market CapShares × price$2M$10.9B$2.2B$1.6B$297M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$4M$11.1B$2.4B$1.6B$168M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.06x-6389.34x-2.92x-3.60x-1.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple90.41x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue13.16x0.99x23.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.27x20.71x1.91x2.21x9.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF69.58x
Evenly matched — SLXN and ARWR and SRPT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

SRPT delivers a 4.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. NTLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SRPT's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARWR scores 6/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.9%-55.5%+4.9%-56.6%-5.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-144.7%-18.1%+1.9%-45.2%-74.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.3%-31.4%-44.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.1%+8.8%-24.0%-48.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–956441
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.73x0.91x0.14x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$6M$140M$238M-$62M-$129M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$227M$801M$155M$147M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$468,000$366M$1.0B$93M$18M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1321.56x-1.03x-14.00x
ARWR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ARWR five years ago would be worth $11,743 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for SLXN. Over the past 12 months, ARWR leads with a +496.9% total return vs SLXN's -96.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARWR at 24.4% vs SLXN's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-72.4%+15.0%-2.4%+48.9%+47.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-96.5%+496.9%-43.4%+88.1%+127.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+92.7%-83.6%-68.3%-68.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+17.4%-72.1%-79.8%-91.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+1253.3%+18.0%-42.9%-90.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-87.5%+24.4%-45.3%-31.8%-32.0%
ARWR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

ARWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

ARWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EDIT's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARWR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs SLXN's 2.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.26x1.81x2.02x2.37x2.52x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.36$79.48$44.14$28.25$4.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.52$12.44$10.42$6.83$1.29
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+2.3%+98.1%+47.1%+48.5%+66.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10022.569.763.450.457.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded68K1.9M3.0M5.3M1.6M
ARWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ARWR as "Buy", SRPT as "Buy", NTLA as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for EDIT (target: $6) vs 4.2% for ARWR (target: $81).

MetricSLXN logoSLXNSilexion Therapeu…ARWR logoARWRArrowhead Pharmac…SRPT logoSRPTSarepta Therapeut…NTLA logoNTLAIntellia Therapeu…EDIT logoEDITEditas Medicine, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$81.22$24.63$20.88$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts20543925
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.1%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ARWR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SRPT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallArrowhead Pharmaceuticals, … (ARWR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SLXN vs ARWR vs SRPT vs NTLA vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger pick with 232. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Analysts rate Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ARWR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT?

Over the past 5 years, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) delivered a total return of +17. 4%, compared to -99. 8% for Silexion Therapeutics Ltd. (SLXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARWR returned +1253% versus SLXN's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 81β versus Editas Medicine, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning EDIT is approximately 39% more volatile than ARWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 91% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is pulling ahead at 232. 6% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 99. 8% year-over-year, compared to -404. 7% for Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARWR leads at 50. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT?

Silexion Therapeutics Ltd.

(SLXN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARWR leads at 11. 9% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARWR leads at 97. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EDIT: 98.

0% to $6. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is SLXN or ARWR or SRPT or NTLA or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(ARWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Silexion Therapeutics Ltd. (SLXN) carries a higher beta of 2. 26 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARWR: +1253%, SLXN: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SLXN and ARWR and SRPT and NTLA and EDIT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SLXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SRPT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTLA is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SLXN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARWR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 51%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SRPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTLA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

EDIT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.