Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $777M | $4.50B | $730M | $5.58B | $4.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $1.02B | $310M | $1.37B | $826M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $277M | $69M | $475M | $254M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 51.8% | 69.1% | 77.3% | 71.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 33.6% | 26.2% | 43.8% | 37.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.9x | 10.0x | 11.5x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $1.51B | $117M | $935M | $22M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $95M | $52M | $667M | $1.08B |
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 238.9 | +138.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
- 198.2% 10Y total return vs SFBS's 260.6%
- +41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5%
SFBS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.72, yield 2.9%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 16.5x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.67
- 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- PEG 0.87 vs FFIN's 3.67
- NIM 3.8% vs SMBK's 2.8%
- Beta 0.66 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 16.5x), PEG 1.90 vs 3.67 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.9% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • SMBK leads 1 • SFBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.4x IBCP's $310M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $1.0B | $310M | $1.4B | $826M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $346M | $89M | $618M | $320M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $277M | $69M | $475M | $254M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $351M | $70M | $311M | $283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +51.8% | +69.1% | +77.3% | +71.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +33.6% | +26.2% | +43.8% | +37.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +27.2% | +22.1% | +34.6% | +30.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +34.5% | +22.6% | +22.6% | +34.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +32.8% | +2.3% | +26.0% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.9x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 43% valuation discount to FFIN's 19.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs FFIN's 4.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $4.5B | $730M | $5.6B | $4.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $5.9B | $795M | $5.9B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 16.28x | 10.85x | 11.72x | 19.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.87x | 9.99x | 11.47x | 16.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 1.61x | 2.06x | 0.89x | 4.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 17.29x | 9.78x | 9.47x | 11.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 4.43x | 2.32x | 4.06x | 5.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 2.43x | 1.47x | 1.30x | 2.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 12.89x | 10.41x | 11.58x | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for SMBK. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBS scores 8/9 vs HOMB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +15.8% | +14.2% | +11.4% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.6% | +1.3% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +7.3% | +10.2% | +8.7% | +12.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +4.5% | +2.6% | +11.5% | +16.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.81x | 0.23x | 0.22x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | $1.4B | $65M | $268M | -$1.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $95M | $52M | $667M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $1.5B | $117M | $935M | $22M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.75x | 0.91x | 1.47x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.1% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +15.8% | +12.0% | +2.7% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +12.8% | +16.4% | +3.0% | -5.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +92.8% | +110.4% | +31.2% | +24.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +27.6% | +80.9% | +22.1% | -25.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +260.6% | +194.4% | +57.7% | +136.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +24.5% | +28.1% | +9.5% | +7.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMBK and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.06x | 0.72x | 0.66x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $90.64 | $39.16 | $30.83 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $67.20 | $29.63 | $25.50 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +90.9% | +90.6% | +91.6% | +86.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 65.1 | 61.2 | 63.7 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 211K | 135K | 1.4M | 683K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IBCP and HOMB and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMBK as "Hold", SFBS as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 7.1% for IBCP (target: $38). For income investors, IBCP offers the higher dividend yield at 2.92% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $90.00 | $38.00 | $31.50 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 | 7 | 19 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.6% | +2.9% | +2.8% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.34 | $1.03 | $0.80 | $0.74 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
HOMB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). IBCP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SMBK vs SFBS vs IBCP vs HOMB vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 9x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
9x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +260. 6% versus HOMB's +57. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SFBS is approximately 61% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 5% for Independent Bank Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HOMB leads at 77. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 67x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 16. 6% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or SFBS or IBCP or HOMB or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
72), 2. 9% yield, +194. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +194. 4%, SFBS: +260. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and SFBS and IBCP and HOMB and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFBS is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.