Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Communication Equipment
Household & Personal Products
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Chemicals - Specialty | Communication Equipment | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $20.14B | $4.19B | $39.47B | $1.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.70B | $621M | $35.79B | $2.79B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.78B | $90M | $-156M | $105M |
| Gross Margin | 8.4% | 55.4% | 30.7% | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.5% | 16.4% | 5.8% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 15.1x | 35.0x | 12.3x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.78B | $98M | $22.36B | $654M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.17B | $58M | $5.77B | $124M |
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Super Micro Compute… (SMCI) | 100 | 1293.1 | +1193.1% |
| WD-40 Company (WDFC) | 100 | 109.3 | +9.3% |
| Hewlett Packard Ent… (HPE) | 100 | 305.9 | +205.9% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 46.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.7%
- 11.5% 10Y total return vs HPE's 269.0%
- PEG 0.25 vs WDFC's 4.01
- 46.6% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2%
WDFC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.18, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
- 14.4% margin vs HPE's -0.4%
- Beta 0.18 vs SMCI's 2.76, lower leverage
HPE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +82.6% vs WDFC's -8.3%
SPB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.4%, current ratio 2.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.6% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.1x vs 35.0x), PEG 0.25 vs 4.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.4% margin vs HPE's -0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs SMCI's 2.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs SPB's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.6% vs WDFC's -8.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.5% ROA vs HPE's -0.2%, ROIC 26.2% vs 3.5% |
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WDFC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPB leads 1 • SMCI leads 1 • HPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WDFC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HPE is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.8B annually — 57.6x WDFC's $621M. WDFC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HPE's -0.4%. On growth, SMCI holds the edge at +122.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33.7B | $621M | $35.8B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.5B | $111M | $4.5B | $214M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $90M | -$156M | $105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6.8B | $78M | $4.4B | $303M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +55.4% | +30.7% | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +16.4% | +5.8% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +14.4% | -0.4% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +12.6% | +12.2% | +10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +122.7% | +0.6% | +19.1% | -3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | -7.9% | -26.2% | +48.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.0x trailing earnings, SMCI trades at a 36% valuation discount to WDFC's 31.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMCI offers better value at 0.33x vs WDFC's 3.59x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.1B | $4.2B | $39.5B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.7B | $4.2B | $56.1B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.01x | 31.35x | -665.92x | 20.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.14x | 35.02x | 12.33x | 14.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.33x | 3.59x | — | 1.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.06x | 37.76x | 12.80x | 10.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 6.76x | 1.15x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.35x | 10.61x | 1.59x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.14x | 50.23x | 62.95x | 11.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WDFC delivers a 33.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-1 for HPE. SPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HPE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WDFC scores 7/9 vs HPE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.0% | +33.9% | -0.6% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.9% | +19.5% | -0.2% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.9% | +26.2% | +3.5% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.1% | +28.9% | +3.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.36x | 0.90x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$391M | $40M | $16.6B | $531M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.2B | $58M | $5.8B | $124M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.8B | $98M | $22.4B | $654M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.86x | 32.08x | -11.81x | 3.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMCI five years ago would be worth $92,363 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,219 for SPB. Over the past 12 months, HPE leads with a +82.6% total return vs WDFC's -8.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMCI at 35.0% vs SPB's 4.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.6% | +7.6% | +23.5% | +31.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.5% | -8.3% | +82.6% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.1% | +19.6% | +120.3% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +823.6% | -6.5% | +95.5% | -7.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1149.8% | +122.4% | +269.0% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.0% | +6.1% | +30.1% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WDFC and HPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WDFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMCI's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HPE currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs SMCI's 53.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.76x | 0.18x | 1.62x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.36 | $253.24 | $30.41 | $86.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.49 | $175.38 | $16.17 | $49.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.9% | +82.8% | +97.6% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.9 | 46.3 | 74.7 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 38.1M | 177K | 15.0M | 318K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WDFC and SPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMCI as "Hold", WDFC as "Hold", HPE as "Hold", SPB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.0% upside for WDFC (target: $300) vs -3.3% for HPE (target: $29). For income investors, SPB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs WDFC's 1.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.29 | $300.00 | $28.71 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 7 | 37 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +2.0% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 22 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.70 | $0.60 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.3% | +0.5% | +17.8% |
WDFC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SMCI vs WDFC vs HPE vs SPB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the stronger pick with 46. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) offers the better valuation at 20. 0x trailing P/E (15. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
On trailing P/E, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is the cheapest at 20. 0x versus WD-40 Company at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company is actually cheaper at 12. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Super Micro Computer, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus WD-40 Company's 4. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
Over the past 5 years, Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) delivered a total return of +823. 6%, compared to -7. 8% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMCI returned +1150% versus SPB's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
18β versus Super Micro Computer, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning SMCI is approximately 1424% more volatile than WDFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 90% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Super Micro Computer, Inc.
(SMCI) is pulling ahead at 46. 6% versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WD-40 Company grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -102. 3% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMCI leads at 61. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 0. 2% for Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WDFC leads at 16. 7% versus 4. 4% for SPB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WDFC leads at 55. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus WD-40 Company's 4. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (HPE) trades at 12. 3x forward P/E versus 35. 0x for WD-40 Company — 22. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDFC: 43. 0% to $300. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB?
In this comparison, SPB (2.
4% yield), HPE (2. 0% yield), WDFC (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SMCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMCI or WDFC or HPE or SPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WD-40 Company (WDFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
18), 1. 8% yield, +122. 4% 10Y return). Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) carries a higher beta of 2. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDFC: +122. 4%, SMCI: +1150%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMCI and WDFC and HPE and SPB?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMCI (Technology) and WDFC (Basic Materials) and HPE (Technology) and SPB (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMCI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WDFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock. WDFC, HPE, SPB pay a dividend while SMCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.