Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Packaged Foods
Specialty Retail
Home Improvement
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Household & Personal Products | Packaged Foods | Specialty Retail | Home Improvement |
| Market Cap | $3.62B | $1.83B | $2.40B | $1.04T | $320.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.35B | $2.79B | $3.16B | $703.06B | $164.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $105M | $171M | $22.91B | $14.16B |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 36.6% | 32.2% | 24.9% | 33.3% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 4.1% | 8.2% | 4.1% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 14.8x | 13.5x | 44.7x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.38B | $654M | $1.44B | $67.09B | $19.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $124M | $882M | $10.73B | $1.39B |
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Scotts Miracle-… (SMG) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| The Home Depot, Inc. (HD) | 100 | 129.8 | +29.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SPB is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.15 vs HD's 6.01
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.4%, current ratio 2.26x
CENT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 90.9%, current ratio 3.67x
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 4.52 vs 6.01
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs HD's 184.0%
- 4.7% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2%
HD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 8.6% margin vs SMG's 2.7%
- 13.5% ROA vs SMG's 2.9%, ROIC 32.1% vs 13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 21.5x), PEG 4.52 vs 6.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs SMG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SMG's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs HD's -8.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.5% ROA vs SMG's 2.9%, ROIC 32.1% vs 13.3% |
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPB leads 1 • CENT leads 1 • HD leads 1 • SMG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 252.4x SPB's $2.8B. HD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMG's 2.7%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $703.1B | $164.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $466M | $214M | $302M | $42.8B | $24.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $105M | $171M | $22.9B | $14.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358M | $303M | $282M | $15.3B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +36.6% | +32.2% | +24.9% | +33.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +4.1% | +8.2% | +4.1% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +3.8% | +5.4% | +3.3% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +10.9% | +8.9% | +2.2% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.0% | -3.3% | +8.7% | +5.8% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.5% | +48.8% | +30.6% | +35.1% | -14.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPB offers better value at 1.57x vs HD's 6.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $1.04T | $320.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $2.4B | $3.0B | $1.09T | $338.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.25x | 20.37x | 15.11x | 47.69x | 22.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.23x | 14.84x | 13.55x | 44.71x | 21.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.57x | 5.04x | 4.33x | 6.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 10.59x | 8.45x | 24.85x | 14.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 0.65x | 0.77x | 1.46x | 1.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.07x | 1.55x | 10.45x | 25.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.22x | 11.04x | 8.25x | 24.97x | 25.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HD delivers a 110.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $110 in annual profit, vs $6 for SPB. SPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HD's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs HD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.5% | +10.7% | +22.3% | +110.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +3.0% | +4.7% | +7.9% | +13.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +3.9% | +9.1% | +14.7% | +32.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +4.2% | +8.7% | +17.5% | +29.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.34x | 0.91x | 0.67x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $531M | $558M | $56.4B | $17.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $124M | $882M | $10.7B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $654M | $1.4B | $67.1B | $19.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 3.33x | 1200.51x | 11.85x | 8.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,094 for SMG. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs HD's -8.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SMG's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.1% | +31.7% | +20.6% | +15.7% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | +30.1% | +11.8% | +32.7% | -8.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +14.2% | +30.9% | +160.5% | +21.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.1% | -7.8% | -17.2% | +186.9% | +7.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.9% | +11.9% | +161.6% | +499.5% | +184.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +4.5% | +9.4% | +37.6% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMG's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs HD's 75.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.82x | 0.65x | 0.12x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.35 | $86.95 | $41.30 | $134.69 | $426.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.00 | $49.99 | $28.77 | $91.89 | $310.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +90.4% | +93.3% | +96.7% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 61.3 | 47.2 | 55.9 | 43.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 938K | 318K | 74K | 17.2M | 3.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMG and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMG as "Buy", SPB as "Buy", CENT as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", HD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, SMG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $85.00 | $51.00 | $137.04 | $408.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 21 | 10 | 64 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +2.4% | — | +0.7% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.63 | $1.86 | — | $0.94 | $9.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +17.8% | +6.5% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
WMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SPB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs WMT vs HD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 15x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -69. 1% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus SPB's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's 1. 10β — meaning SMG is approximately 841% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 148% for The Home Depot, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company grew EPS 504. 9% year-over-year, compared to -5. 6% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
The Home Depot, Inc.
(HD) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 6% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HD leads at 12. 7% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPB leads at 36. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus The Home Depot, Inc. 's 6. 01x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 31. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 32. 4% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD?
In this comparison, SMG (4.
2% yield), HD (2. 8% yield), SPB (2. 4% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CENT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMG or SPB or CENT or WMT or HD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, CENT: +161. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMG and SPB and CENT and WMT and HD?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMG (Basic Materials) and SPB (Consumer Defensive) and CENT (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and HD (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; HD is a large-cap quality compounder stock. SMG, SPB, WMT, HD pay a dividend while CENT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.