Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Devices
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $311M | $35M | $1.45B | $1.26B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $0.00 | $322M | $2.51B | $674M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $-21M | $-102M | $-171M | $-173M |
| Gross Margin | 90.8% | — | 63.0% | 65.6% | 75.2% |
| Operating Margin | -94.7% | — | -33.9% | -7.6% | -27.2% |
| Forward P/E | 4.0x | — | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $70K | $0.00 | $52M | $1.04B | $290M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $4M | $287M | $781M | $103M |
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semler Scientific, … (SMLR) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
| HeartBeam, Inc. (BEAT) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| PROCEPT BioRobotics… (PRCT) | 100 | 96.4 | -3.6% |
| Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 11.1% 10Y total return vs PRCT's -39.3%
- 130.8% margin vs PRCT's -31.8%
- 8.1% ROA vs BEAT's -353.1%
BEAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRCT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.23
- Rev growth 37.2%, EPS growth 1.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 14.1%, current ratio 6.85x
- Beta 1.23, current ratio 6.85x
TDOC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +1.5% vs BEAT's -53.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NVCR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.2% revenue growth vs BEAT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 130.8% margin vs PRCT's -31.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs SMLR's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +1.5% vs BEAT's -53.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs BEAT's -353.1% |
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
PRCT leads 1 • BEAT leads 0 • TDOC leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDOC and BEAT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. SMLR is the more profitable business, keeping 130.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRCT's -31.8%. On growth, PRCT holds the edge at +20.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $0 | $322M | $2.5B | $674M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$35M | -$21M | -$102M | $42M | -$165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | -$21M | -$102M | -$171M | -$173M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$389M | -$15M | -$81M | $251M | -$48M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.8% | — | +63.0% | +65.6% | +75.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -94.7% | — | -33.9% | -7.6% | -27.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +130.8% | — | -31.8% | -6.8% | -25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | — | -25.0% | +10.0% | -7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.6% | — | +20.2% | -2.5% | +12.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.6% | +22.2% | -24.4% | +32.1% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SMLR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SMLR's 14.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TDOC's 15.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $311M | $35M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $302M | $31M | $1.2B | $1.5B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.96x | -1.40x | -14.79x | -6.11x | -13.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.18x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.04x | — | — | 15.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.52x | — | 4.70x | 0.50x | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.70x | 11.27x | 3.86x | 0.89x | 5.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 4.40x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMLR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMLR delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-6 for BEAT. SMLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDOC scores 6/9 vs BEAT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.5% | -5.7% | -27.7% | -12.4% | -50.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.1% | -3.5% | -20.3% | -5.9% | -16.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | — | -55.7% | -11.5% | -16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | -4.6% | -22.5% | -10.0% | -28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.14x | 0.75x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$4M | -$235M | $259M | $187M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $4M | $287M | $781M | $103M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70,000 | $0 | $52M | $1.0B | $290M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -12.85x | — | -30.92x | -8.76x | -96.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRCT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRCT five years ago would be worth $6,066 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $461 for TDOC. Over the past 12 months, TDOC leads with a +1.5% total return vs BEAT's -53.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRCT at -2.7% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.3% | -64.2% | -17.3% | -1.3% | +28.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.5% | -53.7% | -52.1% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.9% | -59.1% | -7.8% | -73.3% | -75.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | -81.4% | -39.3% | -95.4% | -91.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1110.1% | -81.4% | -39.3% | -41.1% | +30.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | -25.8% | -2.7% | -35.6% | -37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRCT and NVCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRCT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMLR's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs BEAT's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.48x | 1.24x | 1.23x | 1.91x | 2.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.44 | $4.00 | $66.85 | $9.77 | $20.06 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.88 | $0.54 | $19.35 | $4.40 | $9.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +21.8% | +38.1% | +71.2% | +83.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 37.3 | 50.9 | 74.1 | 69.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 1.6M | 1.7M | 5.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMLR as "Buy", PRCT as "Buy", TDOC as "Hold", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 148.4% upside for SMLR (target: $51) vs 8.9% for TDOC (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.50 | — | $44.50 | $7.58 | $33.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 15 | 42 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SMLR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PRCT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
SMLR vs BEAT vs PRCT vs TDOC vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is the stronger pick with 37.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR?
Over the past 5 years, PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) delivered a total return of -39.
3%, compared to -95. 4% for Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus BEAT's -81. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
23β versus Semler Scientific, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning SMLR is approximately 101% more volatile than PRCT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation (PRCT) is pulling ahead at 37.
2% versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Semler Scientific, Inc. grew EPS 95. 1% year-over-year, compared to 1. 7% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRCT leads at 60. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR?
Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus -31. 0% for PROCEPT BioRobotics Corporation — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMLR leads at 37. 2% versus -33. 7% for PRCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SMLR or BEAT or PRCT or TDOC or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Semler Scientific, Inc.
(SMLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1110% 10Y return). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMLR: +1110%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMLR and BEAT and PRCT and TDOC and NVCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; BEAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.