Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Software - Application
Software - Application
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $497.00 | $2.23B | $3.97B | $3M | $185M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $481M | $1.81B | $4M | $24M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-56M | $152M | $-12M | $7M |
| Gross Margin | — | 25.7% | 32.8% | 60.0% | 85.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | -10.6% | 12.1% | -183.3% | 30.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 89.2x | 23.0x | — | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $359M | $682M | $4M | $510K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $227M | $106M | $3M | $29M |
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMX (Security Matte… (SMX) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Cohu, Inc. (COHU) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) | 100 | 258.7 | +158.7% |
| T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) | 100 | 175.1 | +75.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMX plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
COHU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 12.7% revenue growth vs IDAI's -32.4%
- +199.7% vs SMX's -100.0%
OSIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 18.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- 372.9% 10Y total return vs SMX's 12.0%
Among these 5 stocks, IDAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
TRAK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 6.09x
- PEG 0.81 vs OSIS's 1.39
- Beta 1.15, yield 0.9%, current ratio 6.09x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.7% revenue growth vs IDAI's -32.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.9% margin vs IDAI's -316.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs SMX's 4.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +199.7% vs SMX's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs IDAI's -105.4%, ROIC 21.4% vs -219.6% |
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories
OSIS leads 1 • SMX leads 0 • COHU leads 0 • IDAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRAK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OSIS and SMX operate at a comparable scale, with $1.8B and $0 in trailing revenue. TRAK is the more profitable business, keeping 30.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IDAI's -3.2%. On growth, IDAI holds the edge at +70.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $481M | $1.8B | $4M | $24M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$11M | $229M | -$6M | $8M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$56M | $152M | -$12M | $7M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $32M | $77M | -$8M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +25.7% | +32.8% | +60.0% | +85.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -10.6% | +12.1% | -183.3% | +30.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -11.5% | +8.4% | -3.2% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.6% | +4.2% | -2.2% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +29.3% | +2.0% | +70.7% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -647.6% | +60.6% | -3.8% | +32.1% | +13.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OSIS and TRAK each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.7x trailing earnings, OSIS trades at a 5% valuation discount to TRAK's 29.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRAK offers better value at 0.85x vs OSIS's 1.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $497 | $2.2B | $4.0B | $3M | $185M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $2.4B | $4.6B | $4M | $157M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | -29.86x | 27.68x | -0.22x | 29.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 89.21x | 23.05x | — | 27.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.67x | — | 0.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.43x | — | 20.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.93x | 2.32x | 0.89x | 8.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 2.82x | 4.35x | 0.86x | 3.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 207.83x | 70.85x | — | 22.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRAK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OSIS delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-190 for IDAI. TRAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IDAI's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRAK scores 7/9 vs IDAI's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -6.8% | +16.7% | -189.5% | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -4.9% | +6.3% | -105.4% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.5% | -5.7% | +11.5% | -2.2% | +21.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.1% | -5.9% | +16.3% | -194.9% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.46x | 0.72x | 1.30x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $132M | $576M | $1M | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $227M | $106M | $3M | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $359M | $682M | $4M | $509,973 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.24x | -168.82x | 11.43x | -22.08x | 165.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OSIS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OSIS five years ago would be worth $24,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SMX. Over the past 12 months, COHU leads with a +199.7% total return vs SMX's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OSIS at 26.8% vs SMX's -99.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -98.8% | +92.9% | -5.7% | -38.4% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -100.0% | +199.7% | +8.9% | +20.9% | -52.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +40.7% | +103.9% | -87.5% | +63.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +22.2% | +149.9% | -99.1% | +110.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1200.0% | +330.2% | +372.9% | +102.4% | +14.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -99.0% | +12.1% | +26.8% | -50.0% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — COHU and TRAK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TRAK is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMX's 4.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COHU currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs SMX's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.47x | 2.13x | 1.44x | 1.99x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20528.69 | $50.68 | $311.27 | $5.28 | $23.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.02 | $15.34 | $204.00 | $1.80 | $6.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.0% | +93.7% | +77.5% | +47.2% | +42.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.1 | 75.5 | 30.1 | 49.1 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 953K | 285K | 43K | 161K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COHU as "Buy", OSIS as "Buy", TRAK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 136.3% upside for TRAK (target: $24) vs 4.8% for COHU (target: $50). TRAK is the only dividend payer here at 0.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $49.75 | $293.50 | — | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 17 | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.0% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
TRAK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OSIS leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
SMX vs COHU vs OSIS vs IDAI vs TRAK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is the stronger pick with 12. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) offers the better valuation at 27. 7x trailing P/E (23. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cohu, Inc. (COHU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
On trailing P/E, OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) is the cheapest at 27. 7x versus ReposiTrak, Inc. at 29. 0x. On forward P/E, OSI Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 23. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ReposiTrak, Inc. wins at 0. 81x versus OSI Systems, Inc. 's 1. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
Over the past 5 years, OSI Systems, Inc.
(OSIS) delivered a total return of +149. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company (SMX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMX returned +1200% versus TRAK's +14. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company's 4. 47β — meaning SMX is approximately 287% more volatile than TRAK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 130% for T Stamp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cohu, Inc.
(COHU) is pulling ahead at 12. 7% versus -32. 4% for T Stamp Inc. (IDAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SMX (Security Matters) Public Limited Company grew EPS 94. 3% year-over-year, compared to -6. 7% for Cohu, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OSIS leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 9% net margin versus -344. 1% for T Stamp Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRAK leads at 27. 5% versus -303. 9% for IDAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRAK leads at 83. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ReposiTrak, Inc. (TRAK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus OSI Systems, Inc. 's 1. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OSI Systems, Inc. (OSIS) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 89. 2x for Cohu, Inc. — 66. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRAK: 136. 3% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK?
In this comparison, TRAK (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. SMX, COHU, OSIS, IDAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMX or COHU or OSIS or IDAI or TRAK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ReposiTrak, Inc.
(TRAK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 0. 9% yield). T Stamp Inc. (IDAI) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRAK: +14. 5%, IDAI: +102. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMX and COHU and OSIS and IDAI and TRAK?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMX (Industrials) and COHU (Technology) and OSIS (Technology) and IDAI (Technology) and TRAK (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
TRAK pays a dividend while SMX, COHU, OSIS, IDAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.