Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Household & Personal Products
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Household & Personal Products
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Household & Personal Products | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $16.01B | $1.32B | $595M | $105M | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.18B | $630M | $1.79B | $180M | $7.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $705M | $7M | $-899M | $19M | $-281M |
| Gross Margin | 62.1% | 24.6% | 45.7% | 36.7% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 8.4% | 6.0% | 5.2% | 6.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.7x | 41.4x | 7.5x | 8.7x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $902M | $263M | $78M | $13M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $777M | $45M | $19M | $37M | $203M |
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) | 100 | 267.4 | +167.4% |
| TETRA Technologies,… (TTI) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE) | 100 | 18.3 | -81.7% |
| NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
| Newell Brands Inc. (NWL) | 100 | 39.9 | -60.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
- 169.9% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.4%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4%
- 13.6% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
TTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46
- +246.3% vs NWL's -5.4%
HELE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.9x)
NCSM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.28, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 0.28 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage
NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs HELE's -50.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +246.3% vs NWL's -5.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.2% ROA vs HELE's -37.8%, ROIC 26.0% vs 4.6% |
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SN leads in 2 of 6 categories
HELE leads 1 • TTI leads 1 • NCSM leads 0 • NWL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 40.0x NCSM's $180M. SN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, TTI holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.2B | $630M | $1.8B | $180M | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $90M | $107M | $15M | $696M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $705M | $7M | -$899M | $19M | -$281M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $383M | $3M | $171M | $24M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +24.6% | +45.7% | +36.7% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.3% | +8.4% | +6.0% | +5.2% | +6.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +1.2% | -50.3% | +10.8% | -3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +0.4% | +9.6% | +13.2% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -0.6% | -3.3% | -8.7% | -1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | +100.0% | -2.1% | -109.3% | +9.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HELE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 99% valuation discount to TTI's 439.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $16.0B | $1.3B | $595M | $105M | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.1B | $1.5B | $654M | $81M | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.90x | 439.86x | -0.66x | 4.60x | -6.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.71x | 41.38x | 7.53x | 8.70x | 7.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.21x | 15.93x | — | 4.57x | 9.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.50x | 2.09x | 0.33x | 0.57x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.01x | 4.67x | 0.74x | 0.76x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.75x | 67.62x | 3.48x | 4.98x | 111.23x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SN delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-95 for HELE. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SN scores 6/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.0% | +2.5% | -94.5% | +14.4% | -11.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.2% | +1.1% | -37.8% | +11.4% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.0% | +9.5% | +4.6% | +7.9% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.6% | +9.7% | +5.0% | +8.4% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.93x | 0.10x | 0.09x | 2.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $124M | $218M | $59M | -$24M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $777M | $45M | $19M | $37M | $203M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $902M | $263M | $78M | $13M | $5.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.93x | 2.96x | -5.02x | 28.21x | 0.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $28,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,142 for HELE. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +246.3% total return vs NWL's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs HELE's -35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.6% | -0.3% | +25.2% | +0.5% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.3% | +246.3% | +5.4% | +28.1% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | +229.9% | -73.2% | +104.9% | -47.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | +183.0% | -88.6% | +51.4% | -75.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | +96.4% | -74.4% | -90.0% | -75.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.2% | +48.9% | -35.5% | +27.0% | -19.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SN currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.88x | 1.46x | 1.65x | 0.28x | 1.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.99 | $12.54 | $33.76 | $87.36 | $6.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $79.33 | $2.63 | $13.85 | $28.64 | $3.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.4% | +77.9% | +76.5% | +45.6% | +67.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 63.6 | 78.4 | 27.8 | 64.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 1.8M | 627K | 38K | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
SN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SN as "Buy", TTI as "Buy", HELE as "Hold", NWL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.0% upside for SN (target: $154) vs -14.8% for HELE (target: $22). NWL is the only dividend payer here at 6.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $153.83 | $12.25 | $22.00 | — | $5.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 31 | 11 | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +6.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
SN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HELE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 439. 9x. On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.
(TTI) delivered a total return of +183. 0%, compared to -88. 6% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SN returned +169. 9% versus NCSM's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 590% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharkNinja, Inc.
(SN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SN leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SN leads at 14. 4% versus 6. 0% for HELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SN leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SN: 36. 0% to $153. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?
In this comparison, NWL (6.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SN, TTI, HELE, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28)). SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -90. 0%, SN: +169. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SN and TTI and HELE and NCSM and NWL?
These companies operate in different sectors (SN (Consumer Cyclical) and TTI (Energy) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and NCSM (Energy) and NWL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NWL pays a dividend while SN, TTI, HELE, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.