Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SN
SharkNinja, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.01B
5Y Perf.+167.4%
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+117.5%
HELE
Helen of Troy Limited

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$595M
5Y Perf.-81.7%
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$105M
5Y Perf.+99.1%
NWL
Newell Brands Inc.

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.89B
5Y Perf.-60.1%

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SN logoSN
TTI logoTTI
HELE logoHELE
NCSM logoNCSM
NWL logoNWL
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHousehold & Personal ProductsOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesHousehold & Personal Products
Market Cap$16.01B$1.32B$595M$105M$1.89B
Revenue (TTM)$5.18B$630M$1.79B$180M$7.19B
Net Income (TTM)$705M$7M$-899M$19M$-281M
Gross Margin62.1%24.6%45.7%36.7%34.0%
Operating Margin18.3%8.4%6.0%5.2%6.4%
Forward P/E18.7x41.4x7.5x8.7x7.9x
Total Debt$902M$263M$78M$13M$5.65B
Cash & Equiv.$777M$45M$19M$37M$203M

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SN
TTI
HELE
NCSM
NWL
StockJul 23May 26Return
SharkNinja, Inc. (SN)100267.4+167.4%
TETRA Technologies,… (TTI)100217.5+117.5%
Helen of Troy Limit… (HELE)10018.3-81.7%
NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM)100199.1+99.1%
Newell Brands Inc. (NWL)10039.9-60.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. TETRA Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. HELE, NCSM, and NWL also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SN
SharkNinja, Inc.
The Growth Play

SN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 58.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.8%
  • 169.9% 10Y total return vs TTI's 96.4%
  • 15.7% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4%
  • 13.6% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
TTI
TETRA Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

TTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.46
  • +246.3% vs NWL's -5.4%
Best for: income & stability
HELE
Helen of Troy Limited
The Value Play

HELE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (7.5x vs 7.9x)
Best for: value
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

NCSM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
  • Beta 0.28, current ratio 4.27x
  • Beta 0.28 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
NWL
Newell Brands Inc.
The Income Pick

NWL is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: dividends
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSN logoSN15.7% revenue growth vs HELE's -6.4%
ValueHELE logoHELELower P/E (7.5x vs 7.9x)
Quality / MarginsSN logoSN13.6% margin vs HELE's -50.3%
Stability / SafetyNCSM logoNCSMBeta 0.28 vs NWL's 1.91, lower leverage
DividendsNWL logoNWL6.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TTI logoTTI+246.3% vs NWL's -5.4%
Efficiency (ROA)SN logoSN14.2% ROA vs HELE's -37.8%, ROIC 26.0% vs 4.6%

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SNSharkNinja, Inc.
FY 2025
Cleaning Appliances
34.5%$2.2B
Cooking and Beverage Appliances
28.4%$1.8B
Food Preparation Appliances
24.2%$1.6B
Beauty and Home Environment Appliances
12.9%$826M
TTITETRA Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
55.7%$352M
Service
44.3%$279M
HELEHelen of Troy Limited
FY 2025
Beauty & Wellness
52.5%$1.0B
Home & Outdoor
47.5%$906M
NCSMNCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
69.6%$128M
Service
30.4%$56M
NWLNewell Brands Inc.
FY 2025
Home And Commercial
52.4%$3.8B
Learning And Development
37.4%$2.7B
Outdoor And Recreation
10.3%$741M

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSNLAGGINGNWL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NWL is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 40.0x NCSM's $180M. SN is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HELE's -50.3%. On growth, TTI holds the edge at -0.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.2B$630M$1.8B$180M$7.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.1B$90M$107M$15M$696M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$705M$7M-$899M$19M-$281M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$383M$3M$171M$24M$19M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+62.1%+24.6%+45.7%+36.7%+34.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.3%+8.4%+6.0%+5.2%+6.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.6%+1.2%-50.3%+10.8%-3.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+7.4%+0.4%+9.6%+13.2%+0.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-0.6%-3.3%-8.7%-1.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.4%+100.0%-2.1%-109.3%+9.9%
SN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HELE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 99% valuation discount to TTI's 439.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NCSM's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTI's 15.9x.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
Market CapShares × price$16.0B$1.3B$595M$105M$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16.1B$1.5B$654M$81M$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.90x439.86x-0.66x4.60x-6.54x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.71x41.38x7.53x8.70x7.93x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.21x15.93x4.57x9.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.50x2.09x0.33x0.57x0.26x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.01x4.67x0.74x0.76x0.78x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF33.75x67.62x3.48x4.98x111.23x
HELE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

SN delivers a 28.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-95 for HELE. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NWL's 2.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SN scores 6/9 vs NWL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+28.0%+2.5%-94.5%+14.4%-11.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+14.2%+1.1%-37.8%+11.4%-2.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+26.0%+9.5%+4.6%+7.9%+4.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+28.6%+9.7%+5.0%+8.4%+5.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964563
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.34x0.93x0.10x0.09x2.36x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$124M$218M$59M-$24M$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$777M$45M$19M$37M$203M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$902M$263M$78M$13M$5.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense26.93x2.96x-5.02x28.21x0.01x
Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TTI five years ago would be worth $28,304 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,142 for HELE. Over the past 12 months, TTI leads with a +246.3% total return vs NWL's -5.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTI at 48.9% vs HELE's -35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.6%-0.3%+25.2%+0.5%+21.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+39.3%+246.3%+5.4%+28.1%-5.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.9%+229.9%-73.2%+104.9%-47.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.9%+183.0%-88.6%+51.4%-75.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+169.9%+96.4%-74.4%-90.0%-75.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+39.2%+48.9%-35.5%+27.0%-19.5%
TTI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NWL's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SN currently trades 84.4% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.88x1.46x1.65x0.28x1.91x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$133.99$12.54$33.76$87.36$6.64
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$79.33$2.63$13.85$28.64$3.07
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.4%+77.9%+76.5%+45.6%+67.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.363.678.427.864.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M1.8M627K38K5.9M
Evenly matched — SN and NCSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: SN as "Buy", TTI as "Buy", HELE as "Hold", NWL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 36.0% upside for SN (target: $154) vs -14.8% for HELE (target: $22). NWL is the only dividend payer here at 6.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSN logoSNSharkNinja, Inc.TTI logoTTITETRA Technologie…HELE logoHELEHelen of Troy Lim…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…NWL logoNWLNewell Brands Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$153.83$12.25$22.00$5.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts9311126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+6.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises311
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.3%+0.3%0.0%
SN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). HELE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSharkNinja, Inc. (SN)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SN vs TTI vs HELE vs NCSM vs NWL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SharkNinja, Inc.

(SN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus TETRA Technologies, Inc. at 439. 9x. On forward P/E, Helen of Troy Limited is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

Over the past 5 years, TETRA Technologies, Inc.

(TTI) delivered a total return of +183. 0%, compared to -88. 6% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SN returned +169. 9% versus NCSM's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Newell Brands Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning NWL is approximately 590% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 2% for Newell Brands Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SharkNinja, Inc.

(SN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -6. 4% for Helen of Troy Limited (HELE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -827. 7% for Helen of Troy Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SN leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -50. 3% for Helen of Troy Limited — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SN leads at 14. 4% versus 6. 0% for HELE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SN leads at 49. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Helen of Troy Limited (HELE) trades at 7.

5x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for TETRA Technologies, Inc. — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SN: 36. 0% to $153. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL?

In this comparison, NWL (6.

4% yield) pays a dividend. SN, TTI, HELE, NCSM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SN or TTI or HELE or NCSM or NWL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28)). SharkNinja, Inc. (SN) carries a higher beta of 1. 88 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -90. 0%, SN: +169. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SN and TTI and HELE and NCSM and NWL?

These companies operate in different sectors (SN (Consumer Cyclical) and TTI (Energy) and HELE (Consumer Defensive) and NCSM (Energy) and NWL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HELE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWL is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NWL pays a dividend while SN, TTI, HELE, NCSM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TTI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HELE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NCSM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SN and TTI and HELE and NCSM and NWL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SN: -100.0% · TTI: -0.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SN: 22.9x · TTI: 439.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.