Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Semiconductors
Computer Hardware
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Computer Hardware | Semiconductors | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $230.60B | $170.65B | $842.38B | $162.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13.59B | $11.01B | $58.12B | $11.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.64B | $2.38B | $24.11B | $6.49B |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 41.5% | 58.4% | 45.4% |
| Operating Margin | 40.9% | 28.3% | 48.5% | 30.8% |
| Forward P/E | 24.6x | 53.1x | 13.1x | 48.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $5.37B | $15.28B | $5.08B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.48B | $891M | $9.64B | $2.11B |
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) | 100 | 3334.8 | +3234.8% |
| Seagate Technology … (STX) | 100 | 767.9 | +667.9% |
| Micron Technology, … (MU) | 100 | 797.6 | +697.6% |
| Western Digital Cor… (WDC) | 100 | 981.0 | +881.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 42.4% 10Y total return vs MU's 74.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.47, Low D/E 22.2%, current ratio 3.56x
- 89.0% revenue growth vs STX's 38.9%
- +41.6% vs STX's +7.2%
STX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.06, yield 0.4%
- Beta 2.06, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.38x
- Beta 2.06 vs SNDK's 3.47
- 0.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MU's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
MU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 48.9%, EPS growth 9.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- PEG 0.50 vs STX's 4.31
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 53.1x), PEG 0.50 vs 4.31
WDC is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 55.1% margin vs STX's 21.6%
- 44.0% ROA vs MU's 27.7%, ROIC 13.8% vs 13.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 89.0% revenue growth vs STX's 38.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 53.1x), PEG 0.50 vs 4.31 | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.1% margin vs STX's 21.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.06 vs SNDK's 3.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MU's 0.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.6% vs STX's +7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 44.0% ROA vs MU's 27.7%, ROIC 13.8% vs 13.2% |
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MU leads in 2 of 6 categories
STX leads 2 • SNDK leads 1 • WDC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MU is the larger business by revenue, generating $58.1B annually — 5.3x STX's $11.0B. WDC is the more profitable business, keeping 55.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STX's 21.6%. On growth, SNDK holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13.6B | $11.0B | $58.1B | $11.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5.7B | $3.4B | $37.0B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.6B | $2.4B | $24.1B | $6.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $2.6B | $22.1B | $2.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +41.5% | +58.4% | +45.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | +28.3% | +48.5% | +30.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +34.2% | +21.6% | +41.5% | +55.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +23.9% | +38.0% | +24.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +44.1% | +196.3% | +45.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +108.3% | +7.6% | +5.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 93.8x trailing earnings, WDC trades at a 19% valuation discount to STX's 115.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MU offers better value at 3.75x vs STX's 9.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $230.6B | $170.7B | $842.4B | $162.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $231.2B | $175.1B | $848.0B | $165.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -138.02x | 115.59x | 98.39x | 93.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.63x | 53.08x | 13.07x | 48.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.40x | 3.75x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 81.80x | 46.54x | 59.50x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 31.35x | 18.76x | 22.54x | 17.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.58x | — | 15.51x | 32.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 208.62x | 505.02x | 126.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STX delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $41 for MU. SNDK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WDC's 0.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STX scores 7/9 vs WDC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +43.4% | +9.2% | +40.8% | +91.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +33.4% | +27.9% | +27.7% | +44.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +41.4% | +13.2% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.9% | +37.7% | +15.0% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | — | 0.28x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $561M | $4.5B | $5.6B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $891M | $9.6B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $5.4B | $15.3B | $5.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 45.06x | 10.54x | 80.35x | 26.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNDK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNDK five years ago would be worth $433,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $88,526 for STX. Over the past 12 months, SNDK leads with a +4161.7% total return vs STX's +715.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNDK at 2.5% vs MU's 130.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +467.6% | +172.4% | +136.8% | +155.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4161.7% | +715.6% | +777.6% | +984.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4239.8% | +1305.4% | +1129.2% | +1760.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4239.8% | +785.3% | +826.4% | +826.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4239.8% | +4188.3% | +7488.3% | +1641.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.5% | +141.3% | +130.8% | +165.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STX and MU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STX is the less volatile stock with a 2.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNDK's 3.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.47x | 2.06x | 2.58x | 2.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1563.61 | $802.00 | $747.08 | $483.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.13 | $94.97 | $83.36 | $43.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +97.6% | +100.0% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.5 | 81.1 | 77.4 | 73.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16.5M | 3.9M | 43.5M | 8.0M |
Analyst Outlook
STX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNDK as "Buy", STX as "Buy", MU as "Buy", WDC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.6% upside for WDC (target: $424) vs -37.3% for MU (target: $468). STX is the only dividend payer here at 0.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1268.00 | $652.29 | $468.24 | $424.46 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 52 | 68 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.76 | $0.46 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
MU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). STX leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SNDK vs STX vs MU vs WDC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDK or STX or MU or WDC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the stronger pick with 50.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 9% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX). Western Digital Corporation (WDC) offers the better valuation at 93. 8x trailing P/E (48. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
On trailing P/E, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the cheapest at 93.
8x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc at 115. 6x. On forward P/E, Micron Technology, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Micron Technology, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
Over the past 5 years, Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) delivered a total return of +42.
4%, compared to +785. 3% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MU returned +74. 9% versus WDC's +1642%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
06β versus Sandisk Corporation's 3. 47β — meaning SNDK is approximately 69% more volatile than STX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 96% for Western Digital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is pulling ahead at 50.
7% versus 38. 9% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Micron Technology, Inc. grew EPS 984. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Sandisk Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, MU leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
Micron Technology, Inc.
(MU) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 8% net margin versus -22. 3% for Sandisk Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MU leads at 26. 4% versus -18. 7% for SNDK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MU leads at 39. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNDK or STX or MU or WDC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 4. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 53. 1x for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — 40. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDC: -11. 6% to $424. 46.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNDK or STX or MU or WDC?
In this comparison, STX (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SNDK, MU, WDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SNDK or STX or MU or WDC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Western Digital Corporation (WDC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1642% 10Y return).
Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WDC: +1642%, STX: +41. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNDK and STX and MU and WDC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNDK is a large-cap quality compounder stock; STX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MU is a large-cap high-growth stock; WDC is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.