Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Security & Protection Services
Communication Equipment
Specialty Retail
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Software - Application | Security & Protection Services | Communication Equipment | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $62M | $2.36B | $2M | $11.12B | $2.93T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $1.04B | $19M | $5.40B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $128M | $-11M | $419M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 70.3% | 25.2% | 47.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 13.3% | -68.3% | 14.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.0x | 17.3x | — | 12.7x | 31.4x |
| Total Debt | $550K | $1.13B | $9M | $2.82B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $963M | $454K | $125M | $86.81B |
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Senstar Technologie… (SNT) | 100 | 89.5 | -10.5% |
| Alarm.com Holdings,… (ALRM) | 100 | 100.7 | +0.7% |
| Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Zebra Technologies … (ZBRA) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.44
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 3.08x
- Beta 0.44, current ratio 3.08x
- 12.8% margin vs DGLY's -59.7%
ALRM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DGLY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ZBRA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 29.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs ZBRA's 261.2%
- PEG 1.12 vs SNT's 11.38
- 12.4% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs DGLY's -30.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.8% margin vs DGLY's -59.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs DGLY's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.0% vs DGLY's -78.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs DGLY's -42.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -114.7% |
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SNT leads 1 • ALRM leads 0 • DGLY leads 0 • ZBRA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNT and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 39907.3x DGLY's $19M. SNT is the more profitable business, keeping 12.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DGLY's -59.7%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $1.0B | $19M | $5.4B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $178M | -$11M | $968M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $128M | -$11M | $419M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $120M | -$11M | $831M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +70.3% | +25.2% | +47.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +13.3% | -68.3% | +14.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +12.4% | -59.7% | +7.8% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.9% | +11.5% | -57.7% | +15.4% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.1% | +11.0% | +0.3% | +10.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.4% | -9.6% | -84.5% | -55.7% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SNT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, ALRM trades at a 49% valuation discount to AMZN's 38.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.36x vs SNT's 11.38x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $62M | $2.4B | $2M | $11.1B | $2.93T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $42M | $2.5B | $11M | $13.8B | $3.00T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.00x | 19.35x | -0.23x | 27.63x | 38.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.31x | — | 12.68x | 31.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.38x | 1.94x | — | — | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.03x | 13.92x | — | 14.02x | 20.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 2.34x | 0.12x | 2.06x | 4.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 3.15x | — | 3.23x | 7.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.65x | 17.25x | — | 13.38x | 381.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-136 for DGLY. SNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALRM's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNT scores 7/9 vs DGLY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.0% | +14.5% | -136.3% | +11.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.2% | +6.4% | -42.8% | +4.9% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | +12.2% | -114.7% | +10.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.7% | +8.1% | -135.2% | +12.4% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.27x | — | 0.78x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$20M | $171M | $8M | $2.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $963M | $454,314 | $125M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $550,000 | $1.1B | $9M | $2.8B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.67x | 15.78x | -3.40x | 4.17x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $17,094 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for DGLY. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +42.0% total return vs DGLY's -78.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.1% vs DGLY's -94.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -42.1% | -7.1% | +93.9% | -9.0% | +20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -21.2% | -13.9% | -78.7% | -14.8% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.7% | +3.4% | -100.0% | -18.7% | +157.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.9% | -42.5% | -100.0% | -53.3% | +70.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.5% | +117.4% | -100.0% | +261.2% | +702.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.9% | +1.1% | -94.2% | -6.7% | +37.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DGLY's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs DGLY's 17.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 1.10x | 3.66x | 1.84x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.34 | $60.76 | $7.49 | $352.66 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.64 | $41.51 | $0.60 | $199.05 | $188.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.4% | +78.3% | +17.1% | +64.1% | +97.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.8 | 57.0 | 42.6 | 54.8 | 74.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 26K | 412K | 161K | 710K | 45.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SNT and ALRM each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALRM as "Buy", ZBRA as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 37.6% upside for ZBRA (target: $311) vs 12.5% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $55.00 | — | $311.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | — | 25 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +5.3% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SNT vs ALRM vs DGLY vs ZBRA vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Alarm. com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alarm. com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Alarm.
com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 38. 0x. On forward P/E, Zebra Technologies Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Alarm. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 74x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +70. 9%, compared to -100. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +702. 2% versus DGLY's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Senstar Technologies Ltd.
(SNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Digital Ally, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning DGLY is approximately 725% more volatile than SNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Senstar Technologies Ltd. (SNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 127% for Alarm. com Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -30. 4% for Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Senstar Technologies Ltd. grew EPS 298. 9% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Zebra Technologies Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
Alarm.
com Holdings, Inc. (ALRM) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus -101. 0% for Digital Ally, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZBRA leads at 14. 8% versus -77. 4% for DGLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNT leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Alarm. com Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 74x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZBRA: 37. 6% to $311. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SNT or ALRM or DGLY or ZBRA or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Senstar Technologies Ltd.
(SNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44)). Digital Ally, Inc. (DGLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNT: +38. 5%, DGLY: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNT and ALRM and DGLY and ZBRA and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SNT (Industrials) and ALRM (Technology) and DGLY (Industrials) and ZBRA (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.