Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Infrastructure
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Computer Hardware | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $2M | $16M | $4.83B | $31M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $12M | $907M | $299M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-34M | $-1.31B | $13M |
| Gross Margin | 45.7% | 12.8% | -47.7% | -26.9% |
| Operating Margin | -143.4% | -429.2% | -90.6% | 11.3% |
| Total Debt | $866K | $5M | $3.65B | $79M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $200M | $547M | $22M |
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Society Pass Incorp… (SOPA) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Ebang International… (EBON) | 100 | 5.4 | -94.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 24.9 | -75.1% |
| Katapult Holdings, … (KPLT) | 100 | 7.1 | -92.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOPA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
EBON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 27.31x
- Beta 1.89, current ratio 27.31x
MARA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -51.6% 10Y total return vs KPLT's -97.2%
- 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0%
KPLT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.04
- Rev growth 18.0%, EPS growth 98.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 4.3% margin vs EBON's -276.8%
- Beta 0.04 vs MARA's 3.11
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.2% NII/revenue growth vs SOPA's -13.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs EBON's -276.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs MARA's 3.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.0% vs SOPA's -67.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MARA's -17.1%, ROIC 39.6% vs -9.0% |
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KPLT leads in 2 of 6 categories
EBON leads 1 • MARA leads 1 • SOPA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KPLT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 125.5x SOPA's $7M. KPLT is the more profitable business, keeping 4.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EBON's -2.8%. On growth, KPLT holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $12M | $907M | $299M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$51M | $627M | $159M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$34M | -$1.3B | $13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$36M | -$312M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.7% | +12.8% | -47.7% | -26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.4% | -4.3% | -90.6% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -77.4% | -2.8% | -144.6% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | -2.9% | -34.4% | -1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.6% | -21.3% | — | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -85.4% | +31.4% | -4.8% | +105.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KPLT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $16M | $4.8B | $31M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$4M | -$180M | $7.9B | $87M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -1.07x | -3.44x | -63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 0.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.32x | 2.40x | 5.32x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.06x | 1.30x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.94x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBON leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBON delivers a -13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-13 in annual profit, vs $-41 for SOPA. EBON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EBON scores 5/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.8% | -13.3% | -30.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.8% | -12.6% | -17.1% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -34.3% | -9.0% | +39.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.7% | -8.9% | -12.1% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 1.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$196M | $3.1B | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $200M | $547M | $22M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $866,416 | $5M | $3.6B | $79M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -92.89x | — | 4.73x | 1.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MARA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MARA five years ago would be worth $4,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SOPA. Over the past 12 months, KPLT leads with a -1.0% total return vs SOPA's -67.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MARA at 10.8% vs SOPA's -70.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -89.4% | -25.0% | +28.2% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -67.1% | -32.8% | -4.7% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.5% | -61.5% | +36.1% | -56.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -97.7% | -59.5% | -97.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.4% | -51.6% | -97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.6% | -27.2% | +10.8% | -23.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MARA and KPLT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KPLT is the less volatile stock with a 0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MARA's 3.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MARA currently trades 54.2% from its 52-week high vs SOPA's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.19x | 1.89x | 3.11x | 0.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.28 | $5.90 | $23.45 | $24.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $1.61 | $6.66 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +40.7% | +54.2% | +28.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.6 | 52.8 | 69.6 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 5K | 47.6M | 20K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $16.13 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 19 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +1.9% |
KPLT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). EBON leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SOPA vs EBON vs MARA vs KPLT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the stronger pick with 38. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Analysts rate Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT?
Over the past 5 years, Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) delivered a total return of -59. 5%, compared to -99. 9% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MARA returned -51. 6% versus SOPA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 04β versus Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 11β — meaning MARA is approximately 8361% more volatile than KPLT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ebang International Holdings Inc. (EBON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is pulling ahead at 38. 2% versus -13. 0% for Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Katapult Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 98. 2% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOPA leads at 139. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT?
Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 5% net margin versus -215. 6% for Ebang International Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KPLT leads at 9. 9% versus -349. 9% for EBON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOPA leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SOPA or EBON or MARA or KPLT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Katapult Holdings, Inc.
(KPLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 04)). Society Pass Incorporated (SOPA) carries a higher beta of 2. 19 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KPLT: -97. 2%, SOPA: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOPA and EBON and MARA and KPLT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOPA (Technology) and EBON (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services) and KPLT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOPA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EBON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KPLT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.