Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SPH vs DKNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
SPH vs DKNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $1.30B | $12.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $842M | $6.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | -10.4% | 41.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | -0.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 99.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $1.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1.60B |
SPH vs DKNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suburban Propane Pa… (SPH) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPH vs DKNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 6.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, current ratio 0.55x
- Beta 0.25, yield 6.6%, current ratio 0.55x
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs SPH's 26.2%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs SPH's 7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs SPH's 7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 99.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.8% margin vs DKNG's 0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs DKNG's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +4.0% vs DKNG's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs DKNG's 0.1%, ROIC 8.1% vs -0.9% |
SPH vs DKNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPH vs DKNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 7.2x SPH's $842M. SPH is the more profitable business, keeping 15.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DKNG's 0.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $842M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $284M | $266M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -10.4% | +41.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | -0.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +10.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +31792.8% | +192.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SPH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SPH's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $12.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.07x | -3113.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.54x | 99.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.43x | 49.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 2.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 19.81x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.37x | 19.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPH leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPH delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $0 for DKNG. SPH carries lower financial leverage with a 2.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +0.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.4% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.22x | 3.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $330M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.42x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPH five years ago would be worth $17,719 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,209 for DKNG. Over the past 12 months, SPH leads with a +4.0% total return vs DKNG's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPH at 15.9% vs DKNG's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.2% | -29.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | -27.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.5% | +4.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.2% | -47.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | +157.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.9% | +1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SPH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DKNG's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPH currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs DKNG's 51.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $48.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.30 | $20.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.0% | +51.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.3 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 12.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SPH as "Hold" and DKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.2% upside for DKNG (target: $37) vs 7.4% for SPH (target: $21). SPH is the only dividend payer here at 6.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.00 | $36.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.28 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% |
SPH leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
SPH vs DKNG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPH or DKNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 9% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH). Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPH or DKNG?
On forward P/E, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPH or DKNG?
Over the past 5 years, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) delivered a total return of +77. 2%, compared to -47. 9% for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKNG returned +157. 3% versus SPH's +26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPH or DKNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus DraftKings Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning DKNG is approximately 355% more volatile than SPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPH or DKNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 7. 9% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P. (SPH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DraftKings Inc. grew EPS 99. 2% year-over-year, compared to 42. 1% for Suburban Propane Partners, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPH or DKNG?
Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 0. 1% for DraftKings Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SPH leads at 14. 4% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKNG leads at 41. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPH or DKNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 88. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DKNG: 46. 2% to $36. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPH or DKNG?
In this comparison, SPH (6.
6% yield) pays a dividend. DKNG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPH or DKNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Suburban Propane Partners, L.
P. (SPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), 6. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPH: +26. 2%, DKNG: +157. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPH and DKNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPH (Utilities) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPH is a small-cap deep-value stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SPH pays a dividend while DKNG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.