Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $4.92B | $374.00B | $192.60B | $67.98B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.33B | $45.18B | $97.26B | $37.21B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-2.15B | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 41.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 29.5% | 15.5% | -4.0% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 24.5x | 16.0x | 93.5x | 7.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.52B | $14.46B | $44.88B | $32.57B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $560M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $4.57B | $9.48B |
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sphere Entertainmen… (SPHR) | 100 | 364.3 | +264.3% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 208.4 | +108.4% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPHR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.0%
- 21.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
- +359.1% vs NFLX's -23.6%
NFLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs SPHR's 234.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8%
- 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5%
DIS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, WBD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CMCSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.38 vs NFLX's 0.74
- Beta 0.21, yield 5.1%, current ratio 0.88x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 93.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs SPHR's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +359.1% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPHR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 2 • NFLX leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPHR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CMCSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $125.3B annually — 94.5x SPHR's $1.3B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, SPHR holds the edge at +37.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $45.2B | $97.3B | $37.2B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $196M | $30.1B | $20.5B | $7.5B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$2.2B | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $333M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $2.3B | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.3% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +41.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +29.5% | +15.5% | -4.0% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -5.8% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +6.2% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.7% | +17.6% | +6.5% | -1.0% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +98.0% | +31.1% | -29.8% | -5.5% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $374.0B | $192.6B | $68.0B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.9B | $379.4B | $231.8B | $96.0B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.07x | 34.89x | 15.87x | 93.52x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 15.97x | — | 7.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 175.64x | 12.61x | 12.10x | 13.73x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.79x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 1.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.03x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 1.85x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x | 19.11x | 22.02x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMCSA's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs SPHR's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.4% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -5.9% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -2.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.0% | +29.8% | +6.9% | +1.5% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.5% | +30.5% | +8.5% | +1.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.63x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.88x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $959M | $5.4B | $39.2B | $28.0B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $560M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $4.6B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $14.5B | $44.9B | $32.6B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.10x | 17.33x | 9.95x | 3.56x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPHR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPHR five years ago would be worth $32,765 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, SPHR leads with a +359.1% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPHR at 63.5% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -4.9% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +359.1% | -23.6% | +7.7% | +216.8% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +336.7% | +166.5% | +8.0% | +101.5% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.7% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -27.8% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +234.5% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -3.7% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +63.5% | +38.6% | +2.6% | +26.3% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPHR and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPHR's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPHR currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 0.87x | 0.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $147.40 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $30.00 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.25 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $8.06 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.8% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +90.4% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.7 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 48.9 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 729K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 22.2M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
CMCSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPHR as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.0% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 0.7% for SPHR (target: $138). For income investors, CMCSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.13% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $137.70 | $115.59 | $138.44 | $30.06 | $31.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 99 | 63 | 32 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +2.4% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
SPHR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CMCSA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SPHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs WBD vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Sphere Entertainment Co.
(SPHR) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
17β versus Sphere Entertainment Co. 's 1. 67β — meaning SPHR is approximately 857% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 113% for Comcast Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Sphere Entertainment Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPHR leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -19. 5% for Sphere Entertainment Co. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -21. 7% for SPHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCSA leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 38x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 74x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 0% to $115. 59.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA?
In this comparison, CMCSA (5.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. SPHR, NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPHR or NFLX or DIS or WBD or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
17), 5. 1% yield). Sphere Entertainment Co. (SPHR) carries a higher beta of 1. 67 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +12. 6%, SPHR: +226. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPHR and NFLX and DIS and WBD and CMCSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. DIS, CMCSA pay a dividend while SPHR, NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.