Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SPNT vs PFSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SPNT
SiriusPoint Ltd.

Insurance - Reinsurance

Financial ServicesNYSE • BM
Market Cap$2.75B
5Y Perf.+218.7%
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

Financial - Mortgages

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.62B
5Y Perf.+164.0%

SPNT vs PFSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SPNT logoSPNT
PFSI logoPFSI
IndustryInsurance - ReinsuranceFinancial - Mortgages
Market Cap$2.75B$4.62B
Revenue (TTM)$3.19B$4.36B
Net Income (TTM)$460M$507M
Gross Margin39.5%91.4%
Operating Margin17.0%34.6%
Forward P/E9.1x7.2x
Total Debt$689M$23.06B
Cash & Equiv.$902M$302M

SPNT vs PFSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SPNT
PFSI
StockMay 20May 26Return
SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT)100318.7+218.7%
PennyMac Financial … (PFSI)100264.0+164.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SPNT vs PFSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SPNT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SPNT
SiriusPoint Ltd.
The Insurance Pick

SPNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 0.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.9%
  • Beta 0.46, yield 0.6%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
PFSI
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
The Banking Pick

PFSI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 173.8%, EPS growth 59.2%
  • 6.0% 10Y total return vs SPNT's 114.8%
  • 173.8% NII/revenue growth vs SPNT's 22.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPFSI logoPFSI173.8% NII/revenue growth vs SPNT's 22.6%
ValuePFSI logoPFSILower P/E (7.2x vs 9.1x)
Quality / MarginsSPNT logoSPNT14.4% margin vs PFSI's 11.5%
Stability / SafetySPNT logoSPNTBeta 0.46 vs PFSI's 0.93, lower leverage
DividendsPFSI logoPFSI1.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SPNT's 0.6%
Momentum (1Y)SPNT logoSPNT+22.0% vs PFSI's -8.0%
Efficiency (ROA)SPNT logoSPNT4.9% ROA vs PFSI's 1.8%, ROIC 19.6% vs 4.4%

SPNT vs PFSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.
FY 2025
Insurance and Services Segment
57.2%$1.5B
Reinsurance Segment
42.8%$1.1B
PFSIPennyMac Financial Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Mortgage banking Production
63.1%$1.3B
Mortgage banking Servicing
36.9%$737M

SPNT vs PFSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSPNTLAGGINGPFSI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

SPNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

PFSI and SPNT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.4B and $3.2B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.4% (SPNT) to 11.5% (PFSI).

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$4.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$569M$1.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$460M$507M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$96M-$3.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.5%+91.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.0%+34.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.4%+11.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.0%-32.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.9%+7.7%
SPNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SPNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 6.4x trailing earnings, SPNT trades at a 32% valuation discount to PFSI's 9.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPNT's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFSI's 18.1x.

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Market CapShares × price$2.8B$4.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$27.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS6.44x9.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.11x7.17x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.68x18.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.86x1.06x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.16x1.11x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.35x
SPNT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SPNT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

SPNT delivers a 20.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $12 for PFSI. SPNT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PFSI's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPNT scores 6/9 vs PFSI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.9%+12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.9%+1.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+19.6%+4.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+8.6%+10.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x5.35x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$214M$22.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$902M$302M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$689M$23.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.79x1.35x
SPNT leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SPNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SPNT five years ago would be worth $22,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,366 for PFSI. Over the past 12 months, SPNT leads with a +22.0% total return vs PFSI's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPNT at 36.3% vs PFSI's 16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+11.6%-32.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+22.0%-8.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+153.2%+59.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+125.1%+63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+114.8%+603.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.3%+16.8%
SPNT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SPNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPNT is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFSI's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SPNT currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs PFSI's 55.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.46x0.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.95$160.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.17$82.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.2%+55.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.440.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded615K604K
SPNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

PFSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Consensus price targets imply 61.3% upside for PFSI (target: $143) vs 6.3% for SPNT (target: $25). For income investors, PFSI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.31% vs SPNT's 0.56%.

MetricSPNT logoSPNTSiriusPoint Ltd.PFSI logoPFSIPennyMac Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$143.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts20
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.6%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises22
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13$1.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+17.8%+0.1%
PFSI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

SPNT leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PFSI leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallSiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SPNT vs PFSI: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SPNT or PFSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is the stronger pick with 173. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 22. 6% for SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT). SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT) offers the better valuation at 6. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SPNT or PFSI?

On trailing P/E, SiriusPoint Ltd.

(SPNT) is the cheapest at 6. 4x versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. at 9. 5x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SPNT or PFSI?

Over the past 5 years, SiriusPoint Ltd.

(SPNT) delivered a total return of +125. 1%, compared to +63. 7% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFSI returned +603. 4% versus SPNT's +114. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SPNT or PFSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SiriusPoint Ltd.

(SPNT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning PFSI is approximately 100% more volatile than SPNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SPNT or PFSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) is pulling ahead at 173. 8% versus 22. 6% for SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiriusPoint Ltd. grew EPS 251. 0% year-over-year, compared to 59. 2% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SPNT or PFSI?

SiriusPoint Ltd.

(SPNT) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 3% net margin versus 11. 5% for PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFSI leads at 34. 6% versus 16. 9% for SPNT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFSI leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SPNT or PFSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Financial Services, Inc.

(PFSI) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 1x for SiriusPoint Ltd. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFSI: 61. 3% to $143. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SPNT or PFSI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. (PFSI) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 6% for SiriusPoint Ltd. (SPNT).

09

Is SPNT or PFSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SiriusPoint Ltd.

(SPNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 0. 6% yield, +114. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPNT: +114. 8%, PFSI: +603. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SPNT and PFSI?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SPNT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PFSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 86%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SPNT and PFSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SPNT: 55.6% · PFSI: 173.8%)
Net Margin>
%
(SPNT: 14.4% · PFSI: 11.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SPNT: 6.4x · PFSI: 9.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.