Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $2.14B | $11.97B | $7.21B | $1.87B | $6.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $762M | $5.02B | $826M | $472M | $995M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $870M | $-48M | $-50M | $152M |
| Gross Margin | 68.0% | 61.8% | 66.0% | 57.4% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 17.6% | 1.4% | -9.3% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 12.9x | 34.6x | 21.7x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $3.86B | $883M | $354M | $71M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $1.08B | $91M | $63M | $107M |
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 35.4 | -64.6% |
| GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) | 100 | 128.8 | +28.8% |
| Clearwater Analytic… (CWAN) | 100 | 94.8 | -5.2% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 70.6 | -29.4% |
| AppFolio, Inc. (APPF) | 100 | 141.3 | +41.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (12.7x vs 25.0x)
GDDY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.42
- 17.3% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
- Beta 0.42 vs ALKT's 1.30
CWAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 61.9%, EPS growth -108.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 34.1%
- 61.9% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3%
- +6.1% vs SPSC's -59.7%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
APPF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs GDDY's 197.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 3.20x
- Beta 0.71, current ratio 3.20x
- 24.2% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 22.4% vs -8.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.9% revenue growth vs GDDY's 8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 25.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs ALKT's 1.30 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs SPSC's -59.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.2% ROA vs ALKT's -5.9%, ROIC 22.4% vs -8.6% |
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GDDY leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • CWAN leads 1 • ALKT leads 0 • APPF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDDY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GDDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 10.6x ALKT's $472M. GDDY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, CWAN holds the edge at +74.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $762M | $5.0B | $826M | $472M | $995M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $162M | $1.1B | $94M | -$12M | $192M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $870M | -$48M | -$50M | $152M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $167M | $1.6B | $152M | $44M | $234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.0% | +61.8% | +66.0% | +57.4% | +63.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.3% | +17.6% | +1.4% | -9.3% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +17.3% | -5.8% | -10.6% | +15.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +32.7% | +18.5% | +9.4% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +6.1% | +74.4% | +28.9% | +20.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | +6.0% | -137.9% | -22.7% | +37.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GDDY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, GDDY trades at a 67% valuation discount to APPF's 43.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDDY's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CWAN's 70.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $12.0B | $7.2B | $1.9B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $14.8B | $8.0B | $2.2B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.24x | 14.41x | -173.50x | -37.89x | 43.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 12.89x | 34.60x | 21.69x | 24.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.62x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.30x | 11.03x | 70.39x | — | 34.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.84x | 2.42x | 9.85x | 4.20x | 6.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.23x | 56.82x | 3.24x | 5.00x | 11.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.04x | 7.60x | 43.85x | 45.09x | 25.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPSC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GDDY delivers a 3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-14 for ALKT. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GDDY's 17.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPSC scores 6/9 vs CWAN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +3.7% | -2.4% | -14.0% | +30.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +10.7% | -1.6% | -5.9% | +24.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +26.2% | +1.1% | -8.6% | +22.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.5% | +21.4% | +1.4% | -9.3% | +25.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 17.96x | 0.43x | 0.98x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$141M | $2.8B | $792M | $290M | -$36M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $1.1B | $91M | $63M | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $3.9B | $883M | $354M | $71M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 10.89x | 0.07x | -3.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APPF five years ago would be worth $13,059 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,510 for ALKT. Over the past 12 months, CWAN leads with a +6.1% total return vs SPSC's -59.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWAN at 18.3% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -35.0% | -24.3% | +0.7% | -23.1% | -26.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -59.7% | -51.0% | +6.1% | -37.8% | -20.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.6% | +28.1% | +65.7% | +41.1% | +23.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | +10.7% | -4.3% | -54.9% | +30.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.8% | +197.1% | -4.3% | -59.5% | +1277.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.0% | +8.6% | +18.3% | +12.2% | +7.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GDDY and CWAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GDDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALKT's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWAN currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SPSC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.42x | 0.80x | 1.30x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $153.16 | $190.50 | $25.07 | $31.66 | $326.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.56 | $73.06 | $15.74 | $14.11 | $142.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +47.1% | +96.9% | +55.1% | +52.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 49.3 | 69.9 | 50.9 | 53.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 605K | 2.2M | 4.0M | 1.9M | 349K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPSC as "Hold", GDDY as "Buy", CWAN as "Hold", ALKT as "Buy", APPF as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for APPF (target: $237) vs 2.8% for CWAN (target: $25).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.71 | $113.29 | $24.96 | $22.00 | $236.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 38 | 13 | 12 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +13.4% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +3.1% |
GDDY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SPSC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
SPSC vs GDDY vs CWAN vs ALKT vs APPF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is the stronger pick with 61. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
On trailing P/E, GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus AppFolio, Inc. at 43. 8x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
Over the past 5 years, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) delivered a total return of +30. 6%, compared to -54. 9% for Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: APPF returned +1277% versus ALKT's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Alkami Technology, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning ALKT is approximately 209% more volatile than GDDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 18% for GoDaddy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.
(CWAN) is pulling ahead at 61. 9% versus 8. 3% for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SPS Commerce, Inc. grew EPS 20. 6% year-over-year, compared to -108. 3% for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWAN leads at 34. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
GoDaddy Inc.
(GDDY) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 7% net margin versus -10. 7% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDDY leads at 22. 9% versus -12. 1% for ALKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWAN leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 34. 6x for Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. — 21. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APPF: 39. 2% to $236. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SPSC or GDDY or CWAN or ALKT or APPF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AppFolio, Inc.
(APPF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), +1277% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (APPF: +1277%, ALKT: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPSC and GDDY and CWAN and ALKT and APPF?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GDDY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CWAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; APPF is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.