Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SRAD vs FLUT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$4.04B
5Y Perf.-39.7%
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • IE
Market Cap$17.64B
5Y Perf.-48.9%

SRAD vs FLUT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SRAD logoSRAD
FLUT logoFLUT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$4.04B$17.64B
Revenue (TTM)$1.33B$17.02B
Net Income (TTM)$70M$-455M
Gross Margin38.2%44.2%
Operating Margin9.3%4.4%
Forward P/E33.1x16.5x
Total Debt$63M$13.35B
Cash & Equiv.$365M$3.83B

SRAD vs FLUTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SRAD
FLUT
StockSep 21May 26Return
Sportradar Group AG (SRAD)10060.3-39.7%
Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT)10051.1-48.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SRAD vs FLUT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SRAD leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Flutter Entertainment plc is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SRAD
Sportradar Group AG
The Income Pick

SRAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • beta 0.65
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.65, Low D/E 6.4%, current ratio 1.17x
  • Beta 0.65, current ratio 1.17x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Growth Play

FLUT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
  • -22.9% 10Y total return vs SRAD's -45.5%
  • 16.6% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLUT logoFLUT16.6% revenue growth vs SRAD's 12.0%
ValueFLUT logoFLUTLower P/E (16.5x vs 33.1x)
Quality / MarginsSRAD logoSRAD5.2% margin vs FLUT's -2.7%
Stability / SafetySRAD logoSRADBeta 0.65 vs FLUT's 1.23, lower leverage
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SRAD logoSRAD-41.4% vs FLUT's -58.3%
Efficiency (ROA)SRAD logoSRAD2.7% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6%, ROIC 12.9% vs 4.5%

SRAD vs FLUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SRADSportradar Group AG
FY 2023
Betting data / Betting entertainment tools
46.6%$278M
Managed Betting Services ("MBS")
29.5%$176M
Other revenue
9.3%$55M
Betting revenue
8.5%$51M
Sports Solutions
6.2%$37M
FLUTFlutter Entertainment plc
FY 2025
International Segment
57.5%$9.4B
United States Segment
42.5%$7.0B

SRAD vs FLUT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSRADLAGGINGFLUT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SRAD and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 12.8x SRAD's $1.3B. SRAD is the more profitable business, keeping 5.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLUT's -2.7%. On growth, FLUT holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$17.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$308M$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$70M-$455M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$363M$880M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+38.2%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.3%+4.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.2%-2.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+27.3%+5.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.2%+17.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-128.5%-22.3%
Evenly matched — SRAD and FLUT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, FLUT's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SRAD's 17.7x.

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Market CapShares × price$4.0B$17.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.7B$27.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS38.69x-58.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.33.09x16.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.68x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.74x10.69x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.77x1.08x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.79x1.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.98x16.35x
FLUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SRAD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

SRAD delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. SRAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLUT's 1.38x.

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.3%-4.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.7%-1.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.9%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+5.3%+4.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x1.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$302M$9.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$365M$3.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$63M$13.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.02x0.04x
SRAD leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SRAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SRAD five years ago would be worth $5,445 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,935 for FLUT. Over the past 12 months, SRAD leads with a -41.4% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SRAD at 1.9% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-41.5%-53.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-41.4%-58.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+5.7%-49.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.5%-50.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-45.5%-22.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.9%-20.1%
SRAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SRAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SRAD is the less volatile stock with a 0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLUT's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SRAD currently trades 42.3% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x1.23x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$32.22$313.69
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$11.66$97.94
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+42.3%+32.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.735.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.6M3.4M
SRAD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates SRAD as "Buy" and FLUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 59.5% for SRAD (target: $22).

MetricSRAD logoSRADSportradar Group …FLUT logoFLUTFlutter Entertain…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.75$227.86
# AnalystsCovering analysts2024
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.9%+6.4%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

SRAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FLUT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallSportradar Group AG (SRAD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SRAD vs FLUT: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SRAD or FLUT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger pick with 16.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SRAD or FLUT?

On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16.

5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SRAD or FLUT?

Over the past 5 years, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) delivered a total return of -45.

5%, compared to -50. 7% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLUT returned -22. 9% versus SRAD's -45. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SRAD or FLUT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

65β versus Flutter Entertainment plc's 1. 23β — meaning FLUT is approximately 88% more volatile than SRAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 138% for Flutter Entertainment plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SRAD or FLUT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is pulling ahead at 16.

6% versus 12. 0% for Sportradar Group AG (SRAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportradar Group AG grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SRAD or FLUT?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

8% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SRAD leads at 9. 1% versus 6. 3% for FLUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SRAD or FLUT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.

5x forward P/E versus 33. 1x for Sportradar Group AG — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SRAD or FLUT?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is SRAD or FLUT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

65)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRAD: -45. 5%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SRAD and FLUT?

These companies operate in different sectors (SRAD (Technology) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SRAD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SRAD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLUT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SRAD and FLUT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SRAD: 13.2% · FLUT: 17.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.