Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Biotechnology
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1M | $1.93B | $1.37B | $124M | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $119M | $0.00 | $15M | $109M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-166M | $-210M | $5M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | — | -17.2% | 67.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -4.9% | — | -13.4% | 10.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 7.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $39M | $861K | $6M | $5M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $281M | $99M | $23M | $357M |
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SRx Health Solution… (SRXH) | 100 | 5.8 | -94.2% |
| Pharvaris N.V. (PHVS) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| KalVista Pharmaceut… (KALV) | 100 | 194.0 | +94.0% |
| OptimizeRx Corporat… (OPRX) | 100 | 72.7 | -27.3% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 885.4 | +785.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SRXH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 28.4%, EPS growth 74.1%
- 28.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
PHVS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.02, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 12.60x
- Beta 1.02, current ratio 12.60x
KALV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.82
- 154.5% 10Y total return vs PHVS's 2.3%
- Beta 0.82 vs OPRX's 2.28
OPRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 4.7% margin vs KALV's -13.9%
- 3.0% ROA vs KALV's -77.7%, ROIC 7.1% vs -152.3%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs SRXH's -84.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs KALV's -13.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs OPRX's 2.28 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs SRXH's -84.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs KALV's -77.7%, ROIC 7.1% vs -152.3% |
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories
SRXH leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • PHVS leads 0 • KALV leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OPRX leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SRXH and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $119M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. OPRX is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KALV's -13.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $119M | $0 | $15M | $109M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$86M | -$202M | $16M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$166M | -$210M | $5M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$134M | -$160M | $12M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | — | -17.2% | +67.3% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | — | -13.4% | +10.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.4% | — | -13.9% | +4.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | — | -10.6% | +10.6% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | -0.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +22.1% | -1.1% | — | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SRXH leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $1.9B | $1.4B | $124M | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $1.6B | $1.3B | $105M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.17x | -10.18x | -7.24x | 24.56x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 7.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 6.55x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | — | — | 1.13x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.10x | 13.91x | 0.98x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | — | — | 6.62x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OPRX delivers a 4.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-3 for KALV. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KALV's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OPRX scores 8/9 vs PHVS's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -53.2% | -2.8% | +4.2% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.4% | -49.0% | -77.7% | +3.0% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -18.1% | — | -152.3% | +7.1% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.8% | -44.7% | -89.9% | +7.6% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x | 0.07x | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $37M | -$280M | -$92M | -$19M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $281M | $99M | $23M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $861,470 | $6M | $5M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.83x | — | -13.75x | 1.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PHVS five years ago would be worth $13,115 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $536 for SRXH. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs SRXH's -84.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs SRXH's -62.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.9% | +12.1% | +72.8% | -46.6% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.6% | +73.6% | +118.1% | -30.1% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +220.5% | +180.1% | -54.4% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +31.2% | +5.9% | -87.3% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.6% | +2.3% | +154.5% | +110.5% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.3% | +47.4% | +41.0% | -23.0% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SRXH and KALV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SRXH is the less volatile stock with a -0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPRX's 2.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KALV currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SRXH's 9.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.32x | 1.02x | 0.82x | 2.28x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.25 | $31.12 | $26.84 | $22.25 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.08 | $14.59 | $9.83 | $5.54 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.0% | +95.4% | +99.5% | +29.8% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 57.2 | 75.4 | 46.9 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22.0M | 227K | 3.0M | 476K | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PHVS as "Buy", KALV as "Buy", OPRX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for OPRX (target: $17) vs 6.7% for KALV (target: $29).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.67 | $28.50 | $17.00 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 13 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
OPRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SRXH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SRXH vs PHVS vs KALV vs OPRX vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger pick with 28. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pharvaris N. V. (PHVS) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Pharvaris N.
V. (PHVS) delivered a total return of +31. 2%, compared to -94. 6% for SRx Health Solutions Inc. (SRXH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KALV returned +154. 5% versus SRXH's -94. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 32β versus OptimizeRx Corporation's 2. 28β — meaning OPRX is approximately -805% more volatile than SRXH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 7% for KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is pulling ahead at 28. 4% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OptimizeRx Corporation grew EPS 124. 5% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX?
OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
7% net margin versus -1391. 1% for KalVista Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OPRX leads at 10. 7% versus -1343. 0% for KALV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OPRX leads at 67. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OPRX: 156.
4% to $17. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SRXH or PHVS or KALV or OPRX or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SRx Health Solutions Inc.
(SRXH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 32)). OptimizeRx Corporation (OPRX) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SRXH: -94. 6%, OPRX: +110. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SRXH and PHVS and KALV and OPRX and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SRXH is a small-cap high-growth stock; PHVS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KALV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.