Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
Advertising Agencies
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Software - Infrastructure | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $32M | $1.90B | $1.74B | $11.18B | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $266M | $796M | $591M | $2.97B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-65M | $69M | $47M | $433M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 37.7% | 70.4% | 77.4% | 77.8% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | -23.3% | 7.1% | 11.1% | 20.3% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 27.5x | 21.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $36M | $58M | $436M | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $87M | $413M | $84M | $658M | $553M |
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| System1, Inc. (SST) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| LiveRamp Holdings, … (RAMP) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
| Integral Ad Science… (IAS) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 30.4 | -69.6% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 41.4 | -58.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.37, yield 0.1%
- 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
RAMP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 31.6% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- Lower P/E (13.1x vs 21.2x)
IAS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 5.7%, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.83, current ratio 3.02x
- Beta 0.83 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage
- +40.1% vs TTD's -58.4%
TTD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 16.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 18.5% revenue growth vs SST's -22.6%
- 7.3% ROA vs SST's -16.0%, ROIC 21.3% vs -39.3%
MGNI is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 22.0% margin vs SST's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs SST's -22.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.1x vs 21.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs SST's -24.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs MGNI's 1.63, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.1% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs SST's -16.0%, ROIC 21.3% vs -39.3% |
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories
IAS leads 1 • SST leads 1 • RAMP leads 0 • MGNI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 11.2x SST's $266M. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SST's -24.6%. On growth, IAS holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $266M | $796M | $591M | $3.0B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21M | $71M | $125M | $693M | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$65M | $69M | $47M | $433M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $169M | $165M | $837M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.7% | +70.4% | +77.4% | +77.8% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23.3% | +7.1% | +11.1% | +20.3% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.6% | +8.6% | +7.9% | +14.6% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +21.3% | +27.9% | +28.2% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.3% | +8.6% | +15.6% | +11.8% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.8% | +2.6% | -57.4% | -20.0% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SST and RAMP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 67% valuation discount to IAS's 45.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGNI's 11.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RAMP's 67.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $11.2B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$46M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $11.0B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | -2491.74x | 44.96x | 25.81x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.14x | 27.54x | 21.21x | 13.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.96x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -2.19x | 67.50x | 13.74x | 15.54x | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.12x | 2.55x | 3.27x | 3.86x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.77x | 2.14x | 1.70x | 4.56x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.31x | 22.44x | 14.05x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-151 for SST. RAMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SST's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IAS scores 6/9 vs SST's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -151.3% | +7.1% | +4.2% | +16.9% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.0% | +5.7% | +3.9% | +7.3% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +0.7% | +4.6% | +21.3% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.3% | +0.5% | +5.5% | +19.2% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.04x | 0.06x | 0.18x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$77M | -$377M | -$27M | -$222M | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $87M | $413M | $84M | $658M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $36M | $58M | $436M | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.25x | 31.98x | 93.78x | 1591.47x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RAMP and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAMP five years ago would be worth $6,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $394 for SST. Over the past 12 months, IAS leads with a +40.1% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs SST's -50.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.4% | +10.0% | — | -37.7% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -7.3% | +11.8% | +40.1% | -58.4% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | +26.8% | -39.0% | -63.7% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | -39.2% | -49.8% | -64.5% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.7% | +31.6% | -49.8% | +680.4% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -50.1% | +8.2% | -15.2% | -28.7% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
IAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.37x | 0.97x | 0.83x | 1.06x | 1.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.00 | $35.20 | $10.34 | $91.45 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $21.71 | $7.29 | $19.74 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.1% | +85.7% | +100.0% | +25.7% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 56.1 | 67.5 | 52.8 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.0M | 651K | 0 | 20.4M | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SST leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SST as "Buy", RAMP as "Buy", IAS as "Buy", TTD as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 269.9% upside for SST (target: $15) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18). SST is the only dividend payer here at 0.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $44.00 | $14.29 | $37.12 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 12 | 46 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.8% | +5.3% | 0.0% | +12.3% | +2.3% |
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IAS leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
SST vs RAMP vs IAS vs TTD vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for System1, Inc. (SST). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate System1, Inc. (SST) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) delivered a total return of -39. 2%, compared to -96. 1% for System1, Inc. (SST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus SST's -95. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning MGNI is approximately 96% more volatile than IAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (RAMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 55% for System1, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus -22. 6% for System1, Inc. (SST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -677. 6% for System1, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTD leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -24. 6% for System1, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus -23. 3% for SST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
(RAMP) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. — 14. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SST: 269. 9% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI?
In this comparison, SST (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. RAMP, IAS, TTD, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SST or RAMP or IAS or TTD or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 06), +680. 4% 10Y return). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTD: +680. 4%, MGNI: -4. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SST and RAMP and IAS and TTD and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SST (Industrials) and RAMP (Technology) and IAS (Communication Services) and TTD (Technology) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RAMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.