Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Specialty
Insurance - Specialty
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty | Insurance - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $2.13B | $5.13B | $7.14B | $5.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.92B | $1.25B | $6.01B | $1.20B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $116M | $583M | $673M | $718M |
| Gross Margin | 87.7% | 92.3% | 74.3% | 93.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 61.2% | 14.8% | 75.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 7.6x | 10.9x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $891M | $1.13B | $1.91B | $646M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $322M | $25M | $1.39B | $376M |
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stewart Information… (STC) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
| Radian Group Inc. (RDN) | 100 | 236.9 | +136.9% |
| First American Fina… (FAF) | 100 | 138.2 | +38.2% |
| MGIC Investment Cor… (MTG) | 100 | 323.8 | +223.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 23.7%, current ratio 4.28x
- Beta 0.37, yield 2.8%, current ratio 4.28x
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 10.9x)
- Beta 0.37 vs STC's 0.78, lower leverage
FAF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.59, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 21.6%, EPS growth 376.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 21.6% revenue growth vs RDN's -3.4%
- 3.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MTG's 2.2%
MTG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 333.0% 10Y total return vs RDN's 250.2%
- PEG 0.44 vs RDN's 0.49
- Combined ratio 0.2 vs STC's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
- 11.0% ROA vs FAF's 4.0%, ROIC 12.7% vs 10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.6% revenue growth vs RDN's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.2 vs STC's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs STC's 0.78, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MTG's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.8% vs MTG's +4.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs FAF's 4.0%, ROIC 12.7% vs 10.7% |
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MTG leads in 4 of 6 categories
FAF leads 1 • STC leads 0 • RDN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FAF is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 5.0x MTG's $1.2B. MTG is the more profitable business, keeping 59.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STC's 4.0%. On growth, STC holds the edge at +18.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.2B | $6.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $227M | $807M | $1.1B | $913M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $116M | $583M | $673M | $718M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $132M | $116M | $824M | $705M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | +92.3% | +74.3% | +93.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +61.2% | +14.8% | +75.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +46.7% | +11.2% | +59.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | +9.3% | +13.7% | +58.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.7% | -5.0% | -90.9% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.3% | +17.3% | +70.4% | +1.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, MTG trades at a 51% valuation discount to STC's 17.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MTG offers better value at 0.43x vs RDN's 0.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $5.1B | $7.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $6.2B | $7.7B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.28x | 9.09x | 11.63x | 8.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.50x | 7.63x | 10.87x | 8.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.58x | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.91x | 7.73x | 7.34x | 6.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.73x | 4.11x | 0.96x | 4.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.09x | 1.32x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.10x | 15.23x | 9.36x | 6.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for STC. MTG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STC's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FAF scores 8/9 vs STC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | +12.6% | +12.5% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +6.7% | +4.0% | +11.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +8.9% | +10.7% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +10.2% | +5.3% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.24x | 0.35x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $569M | $1.1B | $519M | $271M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $322M | $25M | $1.4B | $376M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $891M | $1.1B | $1.9B | $646M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.82x | 12.64x | 6.45x | 27.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTG five years ago would be worth $20,097 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,070 for FAF. Over the past 12 months, FAF leads with a +17.8% total return vs MTG's +4.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTG at 24.2% vs FAF's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.5% | +5.4% | +15.1% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.5% | +14.3% | +17.8% | +4.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.3% | +63.2% | +30.7% | +91.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.1% | +77.9% | +20.7% | +101.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.4% | +250.2% | +138.4% | +333.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.5% | +17.7% | +9.3% | +24.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RDN and FAF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RDN is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STC's 0.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FAF currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs MTG's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.37x | 0.59x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.61 | $38.84 | $71.47 | $29.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.39 | $31.50 | $53.09 | $24.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +96.9% | +97.6% | +88.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 57.0 | 62.4 | 40.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 204K | 1.2M | 945K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
FAF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STC as "Buy", RDN as "Buy", FAF as "Buy", MTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.0% upside for FAF (target: $83) vs 6.3% for RDN (target: $40). For income investors, FAF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.08% vs MTG's 2.21%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $80.50 | $40.00 | $83.00 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 22 | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.9% | +2.8% | +3.1% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 11 | 15 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.01 | $1.06 | $2.15 | $0.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +8.4% | +1.7% | +14.0% |
MTG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FAF leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
STC vs RDN vs FAF vs MTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STC or RDN or FAF or MTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is the stronger pick with 21.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Radian Group Inc. (RDN). MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stewart Information Services Corporation (STC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
On trailing P/E, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the cheapest at 8.
5x versus Stewart Information Services Corporation at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Radian Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MGIC Investment Corporation wins at 0. 44x versus Radian Group Inc. 's 0. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
Over the past 5 years, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) delivered a total return of +101.
0%, compared to +20. 7% for First American Financial Corporation (FAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTG returned +333. 0% versus STC's +133. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radian Group Inc.
(RDN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus Stewart Information Services Corporation's 0. 78β — meaning STC is approximately 109% more volatile than RDN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 54% for Stewart Information Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First American Financial Corporation (FAF) is pulling ahead at 21.
6% versus -3. 4% for Radian Group Inc. (RDN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First American Financial Corporation grew EPS 376. 2% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for Radian Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RDN leads at 1. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more profitable company, earning 60.
8% net margin versus 4. 0% for Stewart Information Services Corporation — meaning it keeps 60. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTG leads at 76. 5% versus 5. 7% for STC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FAF leads at 95. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STC or RDN or FAF or MTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Radian Group Inc. 's 0. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Radian Group Inc. (RDN) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Stewart Information Services Corporation — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FAF: 19. 0% to $83. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STC or RDN or FAF or MTG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First American Financial Corporation (FAF) offers the highest yield at 3. 1%, versus 2. 2% for MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG).
09Is STC or RDN or FAF or MTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
43), 2. 2% yield, +333. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTG: +333. 0%, STC: +133. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STC and RDN and FAF and MTG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STC is a small-cap high-growth stock; RDN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FAF is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTG is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.