Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Diversified
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Office | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $114M | $192M | $355M | $6.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $84M | $88M | $76M | $593M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $-145M | $-10M | $257M |
| Gross Margin | -22.9% | 68.4% | 87.4% | 84.7% |
| Operating Margin | -7.6% | 29.9% | 78.6% | 65.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 24.1x |
| Total Debt | $270M | $0.00 | $0.00 | $2.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $120M | $27M | $60M |
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Star Holdings (STHO) | 100 | 76.9 | -23.1% |
| Net Lease Office Pr… (NLOP) | 100 | 68.1 | -31.9% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 71.7 | -28.3% |
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +41.9% vs EPRT's +2.3%
NLOP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
LAND is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs EPRT's 3.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
EPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 189.7% 10Y total return vs NLOP's 83.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 59.9%, current ratio 6.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs NLOP's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.3% margin vs STHO's -175.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs STHO's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs EPRT's 3.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.9% vs EPRT's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.8% ROA vs NLOP's -32.0% |
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAND leads in 1 of 6 categories
EPRT leads 1 • NLOP leads 1 • STHO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAND leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $593M annually — 7.8x LAND's $76M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STHO's -175.8%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $84M | $88M | $76M | $593M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $64M | $94M | $548M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | -$145M | -$10M | $257M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$77M | $42M | $5M | -$151M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -22.9% | +68.4% | +87.4% | +84.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +29.9% | +78.6% | +65.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -175.8% | -164.8% | -13.8% | +43.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -91.3% | +47.8% | +6.2% | -25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.6% | -100.0% | +38.6% | +24.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.0% | +99.6% | +66.7% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — STHO and LAND each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LAND's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STHO's 18.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $114M | $192M | $355M | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $334M | $72M | $328M | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.80x | -1.32x | -33.76x | 24.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 24.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.87x | — | 3.48x | 17.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.03x | — | 4.67x | 12.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 0.64x | 0.53x | 1.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.99x | 50.83x | 17.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EPRT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPRT delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-50 for STHO. EPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STHO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STHO scores 5/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -50.3% | -48.8% | -1.6% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -24.8% | -32.0% | -0.8% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | — | +4.9% | +4.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | — | +4.7% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | — | — | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $220M | -$120M | -$27M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $120M | $27M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $270M | $0 | $0 | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | — | 2.99x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NLOP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NLOP five years ago would be worth $18,366 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,405 for STHO. Over the past 12 months, STHO leads with a +41.9% total return vs EPRT's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NLOP at 22.5% vs STHO's -19.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +34.9% | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.9% | +16.6% | +10.3% | +2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.9% | +83.7% | -27.3% | +38.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | +83.7% | -41.5% | +44.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.0% | +83.7% | +43.2% | +189.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.0% | +22.5% | -10.1% | +11.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STHO and EPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STHO's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STHO currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs NLOP's 37.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.45x | 0.68x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.25 | $34.53 | $13.00 | $34.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.06 | $11.23 | $8.47 | $28.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +37.5% | +75.3% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 54.3 | 35.8 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 202K | 570K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LAND and EPRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NLOP as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", EPRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 464.1% upside for NLOP (target: $73) vs 2.1% for LAND (target: $10). For income investors, LAND offers the higher dividend yield at 6.72% vs EPRT's 3.70%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $73.00 | $10.00 | $36.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 11 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.66 | $1.16 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LAND leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). EPRT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
STHO vs NLOP vs LAND vs EPRT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP). Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT?
Over the past 5 years, Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP) delivered a total return of +83.
7%, compared to -56. 0% for Star Holdings (STHO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +189. 7% versus STHO's -56. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Star Holdings's 1. 06β — meaning STHO is approximately 11944% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 102% for Star Holdings — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus -100. 0% for Net Lease Office Properties (NLOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Star Holdings grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -58. 7% for Net Lease Office Properties. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPRT leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -164. 8% for Net Lease Office Properties — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus 11. 3% for STHO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LAND leads at 87. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NLOP: 464.
1% to $73. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT?
In this comparison, LAND (6.
7% yield), EPRT (3. 7% yield) pay a dividend. STHO, NLOP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is STHO or NLOP or LAND or EPRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +189. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +189. 7%, STHO: -56. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between STHO and NLOP and LAND and EPRT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STHO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EPRT is a small-cap high-growth stock. LAND, EPRT pay a dividend while STHO, NLOP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.