Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
STN vs CAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
STN vs CAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Agricultural - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.51B | $431.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.47B | $70.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $448M | $9.42B |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 16.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 38.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $43.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $9.98B |
STN vs CAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) | 100 | 745.6 | +645.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STN vs CAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 69.4%, current ratio 1.29x
CAT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 12.2% 10Y total return vs STN's 282.8%
- PEG 1.38 vs STN's 1.59
- 13.3% margin vs STN's 6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs CAT's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.2x vs 38.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.3% margin vs STN's 6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs CAT's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CAT's 0.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +190.7% vs STN's +1.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs STN's 5.5%, ROIC 15.9% vs 10.4% |
STN vs CAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STN vs CAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $70.8B annually — 9.5x STN's $7.5B. CAT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STN's 6.0%. On growth, CAT holds the edge at +22.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $70.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $961M | $14.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $448M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $11.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +16.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +16.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +22.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +30.2% |
Valuation Metrics
STN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.5x trailing earnings, STN trades at a 20% valuation discount to CAT's 49.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CAT offers better value at 1.75x vs STN's 3.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.5B | $431.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.8B | $464.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.48x | 49.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 38.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.10x | 1.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.69x | 34.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.90x | 6.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 20.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.32x | 41.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CAT delivers a 47.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $14 for STN. STN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CAT's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STN scores 6/9 vs CAT's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +47.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +10.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +15.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +19.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $33.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $10.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $43.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.18x | 9.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CAT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CAT five years ago would be worth $40,189 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,295 for STN. Over the past 12 months, CAT leads with a +190.7% total return vs STN's +1.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAT at 63.8% vs STN's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.1% | +55.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +190.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.8% | +339.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.0% | +301.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +282.8% | +1223.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | +63.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — STN and CAT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STN is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAT's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAT currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs STN's 80.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.52 | $930.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.08 | $318.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.4% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 73.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 257K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
STN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates STN as "Hold" and CAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.0% upside for CAT (target: $825) vs -32.6% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, STN offers the higher dividend yield at 0.66% vs CAT's 0.63%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.07 | $824.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $5.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% |
CAT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
STN vs CAT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STN or CAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). Stantec Inc. (STN) offers the better valuation at 39. 5x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STN or CAT?
On trailing P/E, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the cheapest at 39. 5x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 49. 2x. On forward P/E, Stantec Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Caterpillar Inc. wins at 1. 38x versus Stantec Inc. 's 1. 59x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STN or CAT?
Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) delivered a total return of +301. 9%, compared to +113. 0% for Stantec Inc. (STN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1228% versus STN's +283. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STN or CAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 48% more volatile than STN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stantec Inc. (STN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STN or CAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus 4. 3% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stantec Inc. grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STN leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STN or CAT?
Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 4. 8% for Stantec Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CAT leads at 16. 6% versus 7. 9% for STN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STN leads at 42. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STN or CAT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 38x versus Stantec Inc. 's 1. 59x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Stantec Inc. (STN) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Caterpillar Inc. — 18. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAT: -11. 0% to $824. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — STN or CAT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stantec Inc. (STN) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).
09Is STN or CAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Caterpillar Inc.
(CAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +1228% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAT: +1228%, STN: +283. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STN and CAT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.