Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Rental & Leasing Services
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Rental & Leasing Services | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.50B | $7.49B | $4.89B | $13.48B | $4.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.47B | $4.91B | $2.27B | $13.17B | $7.69B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $448M | $440M | $-68M | $390M | $401M |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 19.5% | 48.4% | 23.4% | 14.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 12.4% | 20.3% | 4.8% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | 18.5x | 18.6x | 25.1x | 15.8x | 8.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $987M | $4.14B | $2.71B | $3.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $167M | $15M | $1.24B | $500M |
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 277.1 | +177.1% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 181.9 | +81.9% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
| KBR, Inc. (KBR) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- PEG 1.45 vs TTEK's 2.29
- 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8%
- Better valuation composite
TTEK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 416.0% 10Y total return vs STN's 255.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 55.5%, current ratio 1.18x
- 9.0% margin vs WSC's -3.0%
- Beta 0.47 vs WSC's 2.13, lower leverage
WSC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- -7.9% vs KBR's -41.6%
Among these 5 stocks, J doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KBR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 2.0%
- Beta 0.80, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
- 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.0% margin vs WSC's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs WSC's 2.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STN's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.9% vs KBR's -41.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.2% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 17.4% vs 7.4% |
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories
KBR leads 1 • TTEK leads 1 • STN leads 1 • J leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
J is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.2B annually — 5.8x WSC's $2.3B. TTEK is the more profitable business, keeping 9.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -3.0%. On growth, J holds the edge at +27.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $4.9B | $2.3B | $13.2B | $7.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $961M | $666M | $735M | $865M | $837M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $448M | $440M | -$68M | $390M | $401M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $669M | $579M | $484M | $491M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +19.5% | +48.4% | +23.4% | +14.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +12.4% | +20.3% | +4.8% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +9.0% | -3.0% | +3.0% | +5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +13.6% | +25.5% | +3.7% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +10.6% | -2.0% | +27.0% | -6.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +16.8% | -34.8% | -7.1% | -9.1% |
Valuation Metrics
KBR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, KBR trades at a 79% valuation discount to J's 48.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STN offers better value at 2.82x vs TTEK's 3.81x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $7.5B | $4.9B | $13.5B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.8B | $8.3B | $9.0B | $15.0B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 35.98x | 30.87x | -93.17x | 47.96x | 9.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.46x | 18.57x | 25.13x | 15.77x | 8.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.82x | 3.81x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.30x | 12.50x | 9.81x | 13.58x | 9.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.73x | 1.38x | 2.14x | 1.12x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.42x | 4.31x | 5.76x | 2.94x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.81x | 17.05x | 6.63x | 22.19x | 8.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTEK leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KBR delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-7 for WSC. TTEK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KBR scores 8/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +24.4% | -7.1% | +9.1% | +26.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +10.2% | -1.2% | +3.4% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +17.4% | +7.4% | +9.9% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +20.6% | +9.2% | +11.1% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.55x | 4.84x | 0.58x | 2.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $820M | $4.1B | $1.5B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $167M | $15M | $1.2B | $500M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $987M | $4.1B | $2.7B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.18x | 19.86x | 0.19x | 4.59x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STN five years ago would be worth $19,584 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,924 for J. Over the past 12 months, WSC leads with a -7.9% total return vs KBR's -41.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STN at 13.6% vs KBR's -16.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.2% | -14.5% | +39.1% | -15.4% | -20.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.2% | -17.2% | -7.9% | -23.3% | -41.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.5% | +0.5% | -37.8% | -21.9% | -42.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.8% | +26.4% | -0.6% | -20.8% | -13.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +255.7% | +416.0% | +183.6% | -19.1% | +151.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.6% | +0.2% | -14.7% | -7.9% | -16.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and WSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSC currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs KBR's 56.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.47x | 2.13x | 1.08x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.52 | $43.14 | $31.88 | $154.72 | $56.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $82.56 | $28.63 | $14.91 | $114.14 | $31.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.7% | +66.6% | +84.8% | +73.8% | +56.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.8 | 31.5 | 71.9 | 35.3 | 30.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 228K | 2.7M | 2.5M | 845K | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STN and KBR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STN as "Hold", TTEK as "Hold", WSC as "Buy", J as "Buy", KBR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for KBR (target: $52) vs -25.5% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, KBR offers the higher dividend yield at 2.03% vs STN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.07 | $41.50 | $26.00 | $155.57 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 26 | 13 | 38 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.8% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 12 | 1 | 10 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.24 | $0.28 | $1.27 | $0.65 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +2.0% | +5.6% | +8.1% |
WSC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs J vs KBR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E (8. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
On trailing P/E, KBR, Inc.
(KBR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Jacobs Solutions Inc. at 48. 0x. On forward P/E, KBR, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stantec Inc. wins at 1. 45x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 29x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
Over the past 5 years, Stantec Inc.
(STN) delivered a total return of +95. 8%, compared to -20. 8% for Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTEK returned +416. 0% versus J's -19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 13β — meaning WSC is approximately 357% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: KBR, Inc. grew EPS 14. 6% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
KBR, Inc.
(KBR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 3% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSC leads at 21. 4% versus 7. 2% for J. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stantec Inc. (STN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 45x versus Tetra Tech, Inc. 's 2. 29x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, KBR, Inc. (KBR) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for WillScot Holdings Corporation — 16. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KBR: 61. 1% to $51. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
KBR, Inc. (KBR) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Stantec Inc. (STN).
09Is STN or TTEK or WSC or J or KBR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47), 0. 8% yield, +416. 0% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TTEK: +416. 0%, WSC: +183. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STN and TTEK and WSC and J and KBR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; J is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KBR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.