Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Consulting Services
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $10.40B | $8.00B | $4.22B | $59.14B | $3.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.47B | $4.91B | $2.27B | $16.36B | $582M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $448M | $440M | $-68M | $2.51B | $106M |
| Gross Margin | 42.3% | 19.5% | 48.4% | 36.3% | 40.1% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 12.4% | 20.3% | 24.7% | 20.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.2x | 20.0x | 22.1x | 20.1x | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.04B | $987M | $4.14B | $16.48B | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $229M | $167M | $15M | $459M | $222M |
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stantec Inc. (STN) | 100 | 303.1 | +203.1% |
| Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) | 100 | 194.5 | +94.5% |
| WillScot Holdings C… (WSC) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.7%, EPS growth 6.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8%
TTEK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.
- Lower P/E (20.0x vs 30.9x), PEG 2.47 vs 5.18
- Beta 0.53 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, WSC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
URI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs TTEK's 450.1%
- PEG 0.78 vs EXPO's 5.18
- +46.0% vs EXPO's -13.6%
EXPO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 1.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 21.2%, current ratio 2.40x
- Beta 0.89, yield 1.9%, current ratio 2.40x
- 18.2% margin vs WSC's -3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.7% revenue growth vs WSC's -4.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.0x vs 30.9x), PEG 2.47 vs 5.18 | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.2% margin vs WSC's -3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs WSC's 2.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs TTEK's 0.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs EXPO's -13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.7% ROA vs WSC's -1.2%, ROIC 36.3% vs 7.4% |
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EXPO leads in 2 of 6 categories
WSC leads 1 • URI leads 1 • STN leads 0 • TTEK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSC leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 28.1x EXPO's $582M. EXPO is the more profitable business, keeping 18.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSC's -3.0%. On growth, STN holds the edge at +10.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.5B | $4.9B | $2.3B | $16.4B | $582M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $961M | $666M | $735M | $6.5B | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $448M | $440M | -$68M | $2.5B | $106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $805M | $669M | $579M | $1.5B | $122M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.3% | +19.5% | +48.4% | +36.3% | +40.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +12.4% | +20.3% | +24.7% | +20.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +9.0% | -3.0% | +15.3% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +13.6% | +25.5% | +9.1% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +10.6% | -2.0% | +7.2% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +46.7% | +16.8% | -34.8% | +5.6% | +6.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TTEK and WSC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, URI trades at a 38% valuation discount to STN's 39.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs EXPO's 5.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.4B | $8.0B | $4.2B | $59.1B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $8.8B | $8.3B | $75.2B | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 39.23x | 33.00x | -80.34x | 24.45x | 30.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.24x | 20.04x | 22.07x | 20.14x | 30.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.08x | 4.07x | — | 0.94x | 5.15x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.59x | 13.28x | 9.08x | 10.61x | 22.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.89x | 1.47x | 1.85x | 3.67x | 5.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.82x | 4.61x | 4.96x | 6.80x | 8.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.14x | 18.23x | 5.72x | 89.34x | 25.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EXPO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-7 for WSC. EXPO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WSC's 4.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TTEK scores 7/9 vs WSC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +24.4% | -7.1% | +27.9% | +25.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +10.2% | -1.2% | +8.4% | +13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +17.4% | +7.4% | +12.4% | +36.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.0% | +20.6% | +9.2% | +15.6% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.55x | 4.84x | 1.84x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $820M | $4.1B | $16.0B | -$139M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $229M | $167M | $15M | $459M | $222M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $987M | $4.1B | $16.5B | $83M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.18x | 19.86x | 0.19x | 5.72x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,147 for EXPO. Over the past 12 months, URI leads with a +46.0% total return vs EXPO's -13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs WSC's -18.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.1% | -8.6% | +20.0% | +12.0% | -9.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +0.5% | +0.2% | -11.0% | +46.0% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | +11.5% | -46.6% | +182.8% | -24.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.8% | +28.0% | -19.5% | +178.0% | -28.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +283.5% | +450.1% | +144.8% | +1482.5% | +186.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +3.7% | -18.9% | +41.4% | -8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TTEK and URI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TTEK is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSC's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URI currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs TTEK's 71.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.53x | 2.06x | 1.19x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $114.52 | $43.14 | $31.88 | $1021.47 | $81.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $84.08 | $29.59 | $14.91 | $647.05 | $63.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.6% | +71.1% | +73.1% | +92.4% | +77.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.6 | 42.7 | 68.4 | 69.4 | 38.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 250K | 2.7M | 2.2M | 557K | 452K |
Analyst Outlook
EXPO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STN as "Hold", TTEK as "Hold", WSC as "Buy", URI as "Buy", EXPO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.2% upside for TTEK (target: $42) vs -31.9% for STN (target: $62). For income investors, EXPO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.89% vs STN's 0.66%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.07 | $41.50 | $23.67 | $1037.13 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 26 | 13 | 40 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +0.8% | +1.2% | +0.8% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 12 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $0.24 | $0.28 | $7.18 | $1.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +2.4% | +3.3% | +3.1% |
EXPO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). WSC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
STN vs TTEK vs WSC vs URI vs EXPO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stantec Inc.
(STN) is the stronger pick with 15. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). United Rentals, Inc. (URI) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
On trailing P/E, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Stantec Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Tetra Tech, Inc. is actually cheaper at 20. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Exponent, Inc. 's 5. 18x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -28. 5% for Exponent, Inc. (EXPO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus WSC's +144. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tetra Tech, Inc.
(TTEK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus WillScot Holdings Corporation's 2. 06β — meaning WSC is approximately 286% more volatile than TTEK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stantec Inc.
(STN) is pulling ahead at 15. 7% versus -4. 8% for WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stantec Inc. grew EPS 6. 4% year-over-year, compared to -293. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTEK leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
Exponent, Inc.
(EXPO) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -2. 3% for WillScot Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 7. 9% for STN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSC leads at 46. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Exponent, Inc. 's 5. 18x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Tetra Tech, Inc. (TTEK) trades at 20. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Exponent, Inc. — 10. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEK: 35. 2% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Exponent, Inc. (EXPO) offers the highest yield at 1. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Stantec Inc. (STN).
09Is STN or TTEK or WSC or URI or EXPO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). WillScot Holdings Corporation (WSC) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, WSC: +144. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STN and TTEK and WSC and URI and EXPO?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TTEK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXPO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.