Real Estate - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Diversified | REIT - Retail | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $239M | $1.52B | $2.78B | $756M | $293M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $207M | $486M | $252M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $65M | $108M | $-32M | $176M |
| Gross Margin | -7.0% | 46.5% | 25.3% | 91.1% | -42.1% |
| Operating Margin | -43.4% | 41.8% | 29.0% | 11.5% | -10.8% |
| Forward P/E | 124.2x | 31.1x | 47.5x | — | 1.6x |
| Total Debt | $210M | $506M | $1.67B | $1.56B | $74M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $11M | $49M | $14M | $119M |
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stratus Properties … (STRS) | 100 | 175.7 | +75.7% |
| Alexander & Baldwin… (ALEX) | 100 | 182.2 | +82.2% |
| Urban Edge Properti… (UE) | 100 | 226.0 | +126.0% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) | 100 | 24.6 | -75.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
STRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 213.7%, EPS growth 113.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6%
- +62.8% vs NXRT's -15.2%
ALEX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 75.5% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 51.2%, current ratio 1.01x
- Beta 0.27, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.01x
- Beta 0.27 vs SITC's 1.05
UE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
SITC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.05 vs ALEX's 0.49
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 47.5x)
- 195.7% margin vs STRS's -25.4%
- 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NXRT's 7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 213.7% FFO/revenue growth vs SITC's -55.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 47.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 195.7% margin vs STRS's -25.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs SITC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.8% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.2% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC -0.2% vs 1.1% |
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALEX leads 1 • STRS leads 0 • UE leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — UE and SITC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UE is the larger business by revenue, generating $486M annually — 15.2x STRS's $32M. SITC is the more profitable business, keeping 195.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRS's -25.4%. On growth, UE holds the edge at +12.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $207M | $486M | $252M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $110M | $276M | $125M | $28M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $65M | $108M | -$32M | $176M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$47M | $27M | $189M | $79M | $133M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +46.5% | +25.3% | +91.1% | -42.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -43.4% | +41.8% | +29.0% | +11.5% | -10.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -25.4% | +31.3% | +22.2% | -12.7% | +195.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -147.4% | +13.2% | +38.9% | +31.2% | +148.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.1% | -18.4% | +12.2% | +0.5% | -78.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.8% | -69.5% | +157.1% | 0.0% | -66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SITC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, SITC trades at a 99% valuation discount to STRS's 124.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SITC offers better value at 0.05x vs ALEX's 0.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $239M | $1.5B | $2.8B | $756M | $293M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $429M | $2.0B | $4.4B | $2.3B | $248M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 124.17x | 23.42x | 29.78x | -23.65x | 1.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.10x | 47.53x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.37x | — | — | 0.05x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 125.94x | 23.32x | 16.55x | 18.60x | 5.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.41x | 7.34x | 5.88x | 3.01x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 1.54x | 2.02x | 2.52x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 55.58x | 15.20x | 9.05x | 14.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SITC delivers a 48.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. SITC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UE scores 8/9 vs NXRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | +6.4% | +7.8% | -10.1% | +48.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.4% | +3.9% | +3.2% | -1.7% | +32.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +3.5% | +3.2% | +1.1% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.4% | +4.5% | +3.9% | +1.5% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.51x | 1.21x | 5.18x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $190M | $495M | $1.6B | $1.5B | -$45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $11M | $49M | $14M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $210M | $506M | $1.7B | $1.6B | $74M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.13x | 2.28x | 0.47x | 12.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — STRS and UE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALEX five years ago would be worth $13,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,170 for SITC. Over the past 12 months, STRS leads with a +62.8% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UE at 18.6% vs SITC's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.1% | +0.9% | +16.5% | +2.6% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.8% | +24.9% | +23.9% | -15.2% | +29.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | +26.9% | +66.7% | -15.5% | -64.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.1% | +35.4% | +31.8% | -23.0% | -68.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.0% | +75.5% | +6.1% | +211.1% | -78.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +8.3% | +18.6% | -5.5% | -29.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALEX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALEX is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALEX currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs SITC's 42.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.85x | 0.27x | 0.48x | 0.62x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.93 | $21.02 | $22.26 | $38.30 | $13.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.35 | $15.07 | $17.46 | $23.79 | $5.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +99.1% | +99.0% | +77.8% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 65.1 | 61.6 | 71.0 | 54.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 22K | 1.6M | 891K | 216K | 777K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and SITC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRS as "Buy", ALEX as "Buy", UE as "Hold", NXRT as "Hold", SITC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.4% upside for SITC (target: $8) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, SITC offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs STRS's 0.15%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.95 | $21.00 | $27.00 | $8.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +4.3% | +3.4% | +7.1% | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 3 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.90 | $0.76 | $2.11 | $6.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% |
SITC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ALEX leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
STRS vs ALEX vs UE vs NXRT vs SITC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is the stronger pick with 213. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
On trailing P/E, SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Stratus Properties Inc. at 124. 2x. On forward P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
Over the past 5 years, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) delivered a total return of +35. 4%, compared to -68. 3% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus SITC's -78. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus SITE Centers Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning SITC is approximately 292% more volatile than ALEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stratus Properties Inc.
(STRS) is pulling ahead at 213. 7% versus -55. 6% for SITE Centers Corp. (SITC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stratus Properties Inc. grew EPS 113. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STRS leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
SITE Centers Corp.
(SITC) is the more profitable company, earning 144. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 144. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALEX leads at 32. 9% versus -4. 0% for STRS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) trades at 31. 1x forward P/E versus 47. 5x for Urban Edge Properties — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SITC: 43. 4% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SITE Centers Corp. (SITC) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 0. 2% for Stratus Properties Inc. (STRS).
09Is STRS or ALEX or UE or NXRT or SITC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
(ALEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALEX: +75. 5%, STRS: +49. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STRS and ALEX and UE and NXRT and SITC?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: STRS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALEX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SITC is a small-cap deep-value stock. ALEX, UE, NXRT, SITC pay a dividend while STRS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.