Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Industrial - Machinery
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Industrial - Machinery | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $4.98B | $23.49B | $9.93B | $54.14B | $5.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.18B | $3.22B | $4.26B | $21.36B | $6.55B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $139M | $543M | $40M | $1.14B | $-551M |
| Gross Margin | 29.0% | 36.2% | 32.6% | 46.5% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 20.7% | 8.5% | 10.6% | -4.3% |
| Forward P/E | 29.5x | 37.8x | 16.4x | 11.9x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $471M | $417M | $3.74B | $19.18B | $3.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $131M | $791M | $366M | $851M | $365M |
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stevanato Group S.p… (STVN) | 100 | 90.3 | -9.7% |
| West Pharmaceutical… (WST) | 100 | 79.2 | -20.8% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| Becton, Dickinson a… (BDX) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, STVN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.91, Low D/E 13.1%, current ratio 3.02x
- 16.9% margin vs AVTR's -8.4%
- +52.2% vs AVTR's -32.3%
- 13.2% ROA vs AVTR's -4.6%, ROIC 17.5% vs -2.0%
GTLS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 7.7% 10Y total return vs WST's 367.1%
- Beta 0.49 vs AVTR's 1.55
BDX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 2.8%
- Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth -0.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.0%
- PEG 0.72 vs WST's 4.57
- Beta 0.62, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.11x
AVTR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.2% revenue growth vs AVTR's -3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.9% margin vs AVTR's -8.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs AVTR's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WST's 0.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.2% vs AVTR's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs AVTR's -4.6%, ROIC 17.5% vs -2.0% |
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WST leads in 2 of 6 categories
GTLS leads 2 • AVTR leads 1 • STVN leads 0 • BDX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BDX is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.4B annually — 18.1x STVN's $1.2B. WST is the more profitable business, keeping 16.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVTR's -8.4%. On growth, WST holds the edge at +21.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $3.2B | $4.3B | $21.4B | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $283M | $794M | $644M | $4.2B | $137M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $139M | $543M | $40M | $1.1B | -$551M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $458M | $203M | $3.1B | $439M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.0% | +36.2% | +32.6% | +46.5% | +32.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +20.7% | +8.5% | +10.6% | -4.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | +16.9% | +0.9% | +5.3% | -8.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +14.2% | +4.8% | +14.7% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +21.0% | -2.5% | -10.6% | 0.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.6% | +56.1% | -36.1% | -2.0% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AVTR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.6x trailing earnings, BDX trades at a 96% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BDX offers better value at 1.55x vs WST's 5.79x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.0B | $23.5B | $9.9B | $54.1B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.4B | $23.1B | $13.3B | $72.5B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.70x | 47.93x | 628.58x | 25.63x | -10.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.46x | 37.80x | 16.40x | 11.90x | 10.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.68x | 5.79x | — | 1.55x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.08x | 31.17x | 14.33x | 14.38x | 56.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.72x | 7.64x | 2.33x | 2.48x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.85x | 7.46x | 2.79x | 1.69x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 197.82x | 50.10x | 48.96x | 20.28x | 11.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WST leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WST delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-10 for AVTR. WST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BDX scores 7/9 vs AVTR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +17.9% | +1.2% | +4.5% | -9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.8% | +13.2% | +0.4% | +2.1% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +17.5% | +7.4% | +4.3% | -2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | +18.4% | +8.6% | +5.4% | -2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.13x | 1.11x | 0.76x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $340M | -$375M | $3.4B | $18.3B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $131M | $791M | $366M | $851M | $365M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $471M | $417M | $3.7B | $19.2B | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.54x | 3338.00x | 1.08x | 4.09x | -1.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GTLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GTLS five years ago would be worth $14,063 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,726 for AVTR. Over the past 12 months, WST leads with a +52.2% total return vs AVTR's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.6% vs AVTR's -25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.4% | +18.1% | +0.6% | -1.8% | -27.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.6% | +52.2% | +31.8% | +47.3% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.2% | -10.5% | +62.7% | +2.6% | -58.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | -1.2% | +40.6% | +10.9% | -72.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.2% | +367.1% | +772.7% | +76.4% | -42.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.5% | -3.6% | +17.6% | +0.8% | -25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVTR's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs AVTR's 52.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.91x | 0.49x | 0.62x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.00 | $328.44 | $208.51 | $205.52 | $15.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.89 | $202.79 | $140.50 | $100.31 | $7.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +99.2% | +99.5% | +72.7% | +52.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 76.6 | 43.8 | 50.9 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 586K | 846K | 1.6M | 2.5M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WST and BDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STVN as "Buy", WST as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", BDX as "Hold", AVTR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 34.4% upside for STVN (target: $25) vs -6.6% for GTLS (target: $194). For income investors, BDX offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs WST's 0.26%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.50 | $315.83 | $193.81 | $172.85 | $9.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 14 | 37 | 34 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +0.3% | +0.3% | +2.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.84 | $0.60 | $4.17 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +1.4% |
WST leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GTLS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
STVN vs WST vs GTLS vs BDX vs AVTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the stronger pick with 8.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) offers the better valuation at 25. 6x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stevanato Group S. p. A. (STVN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
On trailing P/E, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the cheapest at 25.
6x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 6x. On forward P/E, Avantor, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Becton, Dickinson and Company wins at 0. 72x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
Over the past 5 years, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) delivered a total return of +40. 6%, compared to -72. 7% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GTLS returned +772. 7% versus AVTR's -42. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Avantor, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning AVTR is approximately 215% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. (WST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is pulling ahead at 8.
2% versus -3. 4% for Avantor, Inc. (AVTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stevanato Group S. p. A. grew EPS 14. 0% year-over-year, compared to -175. 0% for Avantor, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
(WST) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 1% net margin versus -8. 1% for Avantor, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WST leads at 20. 1% versus -3. 8% for AVTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BDX leads at 45. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 72x versus West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 's 4. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 37. 8x for West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. — 27. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STVN: 34. 4% to $24. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR?
In this comparison, BDX (2.
8% yield), STVN (0. 3% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield), WST (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AVTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is STVN or WST or GTLS or BDX or AVTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 49), +772. 7% 10Y return). Avantor, Inc. (AVTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +772. 7%, AVTR: -42. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between STVN and WST and GTLS and BDX and AVTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (STVN (Healthcare) and WST (Healthcare) and GTLS (Industrials) and BDX (Healthcare) and AVTR (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
BDX pays a dividend while STVN, WST, GTLS, AVTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.