STX vs SNX

For growth investors, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the stronger pick with 38.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (13. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the cheapest at 23.

4x versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc at 113. 2x. On forward P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 9x.

Over the past 5 years, Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) delivered a total return of +752.

5%, compared to +94. 2% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STX returned +41. 0% versus SNX's +505. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

43β versus Seagate Technology Holdings plc's 2. 04β — meaning STX is approximately 43% more volatile than SNX relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is pulling ahead at 38.

9% versus 6. 9% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seagate Technology Holdings plc grew EPS 328. 5% year-over-year, compared to 25. 2% for TD SYNNEX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) is the more profitable company, earning 16.

1% net margin versus 1. 3% for TD SYNNEX Corporation — meaning it keeps 16. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: STX leads at 20. 8% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STX leads at 35. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) trades at 13.

9x forward P/E versus 52. 0x for Seagate Technology Holdings plc — 38. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STX: -18. 6% to $623. 71.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) offers the highest yield at 0. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

8% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Seagate Technology Holdings plc (STX) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNX: +505. 0%, STX: +41. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: STX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SNX pays a dividend while STX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.