REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SUNS vs BXMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
SUNS vs BXMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $103M | $3.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 79.9% | 62.6% |
| Operating Margin | 53.4% | 58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $122M | $16.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $453M |
SUNS vs BXMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sunrise Realty Trus… (SUNS) | 100 | 64.3 | -35.8% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 108.1 | +8.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SUNS vs BXMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SUNS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 15.3%
- Rev growth 148.1%, EPS growth -5.0%
- 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0%
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 52.6% 10Y total return vs SUNS's -10.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 0.06x
- Beta 0.74, yield 9.8%, current ratio 0.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 148.1% FFO/revenue growth vs BXMT's -14.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 12.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 46.0% margin vs BXMT's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SUNS's 0.86 | |
| Dividends | 15.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BXMT's 9.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.3% vs SUNS's -12.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs BXMT's 0.5%, ROIC 6.0% vs 4.3% |
SUNS vs BXMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SUNS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 58.2x SUNS's $26M. SUNS is the more profitable business, keeping 46.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BXMT's 6.7%. On growth, SUNS holds the edge at +108.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $16M | $948M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $335M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.9% | +62.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +53.4% | +58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +46.0% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.1% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -55.6% | — |
Valuation Metrics
SUNS leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SUNS trades at a 73% valuation discount to BXMT's 30.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SUNS's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BXMT's 16.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $103M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $219M | $19.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.12x | 30.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.58x | 12.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.93x | 16.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.92x | 2.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.54x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SUNS delivers a 6.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $3 for BXMT. SUNS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BXMT's 4.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BXMT scores 6/9 vs SUNS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.6% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.67x | 4.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $116M | $15.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $453M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $122M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.53x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BXMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BXMT five years ago would be worth $9,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,945 for SUNS. Over the past 12 months, BXMT leads with a +13.3% total return vs SUNS's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BXMT at 14.2% vs SUNS's -3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.4% | +1.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.9% | +13.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | +49.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | -2.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | +52.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.6% | +14.2% |
Risk & Volatility
BXMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BXMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SUNS's 0.86 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BXMT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs SUNS's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.78 | $20.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.39 | $17.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.4 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 104K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SUNS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SUNS as "Hold" and BXMT as "Hold". For income investors, SUNS offers the higher dividend yield at 15.25% vs BXMT's 9.79%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.25 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +15.3% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.18 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% |
SUNS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BXMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
SUNS vs BXMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SUNS or BXMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the stronger pick with 148. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SUNS or BXMT?
On trailing P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 30. 1x. On forward P/E, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SUNS or BXMT?
Over the past 5 years, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) delivered a total return of -2. 7%, compared to -10. 5% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +52. 6% versus SUNS's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SUNS or BXMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. 's 0. 86β — meaning SUNS is approximately 16% more volatile than BXMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 5% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SUNS or BXMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is pulling ahead at 148. 1% versus -14. 0% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -5. 0% for Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SUNS or BXMT?
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) is the more profitable company, earning 46. 0% net margin versus 7. 2% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 46. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BXMT leads at 71. 6% versus 64. 2% for SUNS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SUNS leads at 90. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SUNS or BXMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc.
(SUNS) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SUNS or BXMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sunrise Realty Trust, Inc. (SUNS) offers the highest yield at 15. 3%, versus 9. 8% for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. (BXMT).
09Is SUNS or BXMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
(BXMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 9. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BXMT: +52. 6%, SUNS: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SUNS and BXMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SUNS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.