Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $892M | $22.62B | $2.57B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $606M | $669M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-116M | $-1.28B | $-609M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | 79.4% | 83.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -194.0% | -83.9% | — |
| Total Debt | $27M | $768M | $1.28B | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $510M | $434M | $357M |
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savara Inc. (SVRA) | 100 | 496.2 | +396.2% |
| Insmed Incorporated (INSM) | 100 | 318.2 | +218.2% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVRA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 15.6%, current ratio 13.73x
- Beta 1.23, current ratio 13.73x
- 3.0% margin vs INSM's -210.5%
INSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.54
- Rev growth 66.7%, EPS growth -15.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs PRAX's -20.1%
- 66.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
RARE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8%
- -40.2% ROA vs SVRA's -82.1%, ROIC -65.0% vs -47.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.7% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs INSM's -210.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RARE's -21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -40.2% ROA vs SVRA's -82.1%, ROIC -65.0% vs -47.9% |
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
RARE leads 1 • SVRA leads 0 • INSM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RARE and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $669M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -91.0% (RARE) to -2.1% (INSM). On growth, INSM holds the edge at +152.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $606M | $669M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$121M | -$1.2B | -$536M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$116M | -$1.3B | -$609M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$998M | -$487M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +79.4% | +83.6% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -194.0% | -83.9% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.1% | -91.0% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -164.5% | -72.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +152.6% | -2.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | -16.7% | -17.2% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SVRA and RARE and PRAX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $892M | $22.6B | $2.6B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $904M | $22.9B | $3.4B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.75x | -16.35x | -4.48x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 37.30x | 3.82x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.96x | 30.30x | — | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to INSM's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSM scores 4/9 vs SVRA's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -122.5% | -168.4% | -6.1% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -82.1% | -57.3% | -45.8% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -47.9% | -86.5% | -89.4% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -56.5% | -66.8% | -46.4% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 1.04x | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $258M | $842M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $510M | $434M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $768M | $1.3B | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -14.23x | -14.49x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSM five years ago would be worth $32,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,281 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RARE's -21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RARE's -17.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -40.8% | +10.7% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.6% | +53.5% | -21.8% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.3% | +454.5% | -44.5% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +216.6% | +221.7% | -77.2% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | +793.5% | -59.4% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.1% | +77.0% | -17.8% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSM and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs INSM's 49.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.54x | 1.42x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.00 | $212.75 | $42.37 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.89 | $63.81 | $18.29 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.7% | +49.3% | +61.7% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 41.9 | 66.6 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 2.3M | 1.8M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVRA as "Buy", INSM as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 107.2% upside for INSM (target: $217) vs 63.3% for PRAX (target: $544).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $217.11 | $51.50 | $544.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 35 | 33 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). RARE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
SVRA vs INSM vs RARE vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger pick with 66.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Savara Inc. (SVRA) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) delivered a total return of +221.
7%, compared to -77. 2% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSM returned +793. 5% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
54β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 55β — meaning PRAX is approximately 186% more volatile than INSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 104% for Insmed Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is pulling ahead at 66.
7% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. grew EPS 7. 3% year-over-year, compared to -45. 5% for Savara Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, INSM leads at 35. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX?
Savara Inc.
(SVRA) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -210. 5% for Insmed Incorporated — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SVRA leads at 0. 0% versus -194. 0% for INSM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RARE leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SVRA or INSM or RARE or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Insmed Incorporated (INSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), +793. 5% 10Y return). Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSM: +793. 5%, PRAX: -20. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SVRA and INSM and RARE and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SVRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INSM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.