Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Application
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $4M | $98M | $1.92B | $467M | $139M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $40M | $472M | $249M | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-42M | $-3M | $-50M | $-25M | $-59M |
| Gross Margin | -11.1% | 78.3% | 57.4% | 72.3% | 75.0% |
| Operating Margin | -22.4% | -7.9% | -9.3% | -11.0% | -12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 23.0x | 35.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $7M | $721K | $354M | $87M | $140M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $5M | $63M | $55M | $43M |
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaverOne 2014 Ltd (SVRE) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 129.4 | +29.4% |
| Weave Communication… (WEAV) | 100 | 195.4 | +95.4% |
| Domo, Inc. (DOMO) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVRE plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AEYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 96.5% 10Y total return vs ALKT's -58.2%
- -7.6% margin vs SVRE's -22.7%
- -34.1% vs SVRE's -91.2%
ALKT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth -12.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 97.7%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.23, current ratio 2.09x
WEAV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DOMO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs SVRE's -38.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.6% margin vs SVRE's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.23 vs DOMO's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -34.1% vs SVRE's -91.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.9% ROA vs SVRE's -180.6%, ROIC -8.6% vs -7.5% |
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKT leads in 4 of 6 categories
AEYE leads 1 • SVRE leads 0 • WEAV leads 0 • DOMO leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEYE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKT is the larger business by revenue, generating $472M annually — 256.6x SVRE's $2M. AEYE is the more profitable business, keeping -7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVRE's -22.7%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $40M | $472M | $249M | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$41M | -$504,000 | -$12M | -$15M | -$19M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$42M | -$3M | -$50M | -$25M | -$59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$41M | $2M | $44M | $10M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | +78.3% | +57.4% | +72.3% | +75.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.4% | -7.9% | -9.3% | -11.0% | -12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.7% | -7.6% | -10.6% | -10.1% | -18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -22.2% | +5.5% | +9.4% | +3.9% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +7.9% | +28.9% | +17.4% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.1% | +29.0% | -22.7% | +41.7% | +57.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $98M | $1.9B | $467M | $139M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2M | $93M | $2.2B | $499M | $236M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.31x | -31.44x | -39.07x | -16.05x | -2.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 22.99x | 35.46x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.37x | 2.42x | 4.33x | 1.95x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.35x | 20.31x | 5.16x | 5.50x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 46.49x | 30.83x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKT delivers a -14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-14 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SVRE. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WEAV's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOMO scores 6/9 vs ALKT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.6% | -47.8% | -14.0% | -30.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -180.6% | -9.5% | -5.9% | -12.1% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.5% | -42.4% | -8.6% | -23.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.8% | -17.7% | -9.3% | -24.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.15x | 0.98x | 1.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$5M | $290M | $32M | $97M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $5M | $63M | $55M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $721,000 | $354M | $87M | $140M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -199.75x | -2.79x | -3.73x | -20.26x | -8.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKT five years ago would be worth $4,617 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2 for SVRE. Over the past 12 months, AEYE leads with a -34.1% total return vs SVRE's -91.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALKT at 13.3% vs SVRE's -92.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.4% | -21.0% | -20.8% | -17.2% | -53.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.2% | -34.1% | -39.0% | -43.3% | -53.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +17.1% | +45.5% | +9.0% | -72.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -57.7% | -53.8% | -68.4% | -93.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +96.5% | -58.2% | -68.4% | -85.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -92.7% | +5.4% | +13.3% | +2.9% | -34.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DOMO's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKT currently trades 56.8% from its 52-week high vs SVRE's 7.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.28x | 2.18x | 1.23x | 1.56x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.28 | $16.39 | $31.66 | $11.32 | $18.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.53 | $5.31 | $14.11 | $4.24 | $2.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.6% | +48.0% | +56.8% | +52.5% | +20.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 66.5 | 56.2 | 66.6 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 55K | 195K | 1.7M | 1.5M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALKT as "Buy", WEAV as "Buy", DOMO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 116.9% upside for DOMO (target: $8) vs 22.4% for ALKT (target: $22).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $22.00 | $9.00 | $8.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | 9 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.3% |
ALKT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AEYE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
SVRE vs AEYE vs ALKT vs WEAV vs DOMO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger pick with 32. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -38. 1% for SaverOne 2014 Ltd (SVRE). Analysts rate Alkami Technology, Inc. (ALKT) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO?
Over the past 5 years, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) delivered a total return of -53. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for SaverOne 2014 Ltd (SVRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +96. 5% versus SVRE's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 23β versus Domo, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning DOMO is approximately 105% more volatile than ALKT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 105% for Weave Communications, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is pulling ahead at 32. 9% versus -38. 1% for SaverOne 2014 Ltd (SVRE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SaverOne 2014 Ltd grew EPS 72. 2% year-over-year, compared to -12. 2% for Alkami Technology, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SVRE leads at 55. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO?
AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the more profitable company, earning -7. 6% net margin versus -20. 8% for SaverOne 2014 Ltd — meaning it keeps -7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AEYE leads at -7. 9% versus -1975. 8% for SVRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEYE leads at 78. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) trades at 23. 0x forward P/E versus 35. 5x for Weave Communications, Inc. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOMO: 116. 9% to $8. 33.
07Which pays a better dividend — SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SVRE or AEYE or ALKT or WEAV or DOMO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkami Technology, Inc.
(ALKT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 23)). Domo, Inc. (DOMO) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKT: -58. 2%, DOMO: -85. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SVRE and AEYE and ALKT and WEAV and DOMO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SVRE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; WEAV is a small-cap high-growth stock; DOMO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.