Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Apparel - Retail
Discount Stores
Apparel - Manufacturers
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Financial - Credit Services | Apparel - Retail | Discount Stores | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $1.27B | $753M | $19.40B | $12.22B | $549M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $565M | $11.56B | $4.76B | $1.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $43M | $610M | $359M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 73.7% | 70.0% | 41.9% | 35.0% | 70.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 28.1% | 8.9% | 9.6% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | 21.2x | 31.1x | 35.0x | 14.9x |
| Total Debt | $673M | $526M | $3.99B | $2.03B | $743M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $10M | $1.23B | $724M | $334M |
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Savers Value Villag… (SVV) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 111.7 | +11.7% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 193.5 | +93.5% |
| Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) | 100 | 113.5 | +13.5% |
| Canada Goose Holdin… (GOOS) | 100 | 67.0 | -33.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SVV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.25
- Beta 1.25 vs FIVE's 2.02
WRLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
- PEG 0.59 vs FIVE's 1.46
- Beta 1.27, current ratio 12.55x
- 15.9% margin vs SVV's 1.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BURL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIVE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.9%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 448.6% 10Y total return vs BURL's 440.2%
- 22.9% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
- +169.2% vs SVV's -27.3%
GOOS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (14.9x vs 35.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.9% revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.9x vs 35.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.9% margin vs SVV's 1.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs FIVE's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.2% vs SVV's -27.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs SVV's 1.1%, ROIC 9.9% vs 7.2% |
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOOS leads 1 • FIVE leads 1 • SVV leads 0 • BURL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WRLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 20.5x WRLD's $565M. WRLD is the more profitable business, keeping 15.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SVV's 1.3%. On growth, FIVE holds the edge at +24.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $565M | $11.6B | $4.8B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $210M | $61M | $1.5B | $650M | $185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $43M | $610M | $359M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $59M | $252M | $232M | $412M | $186M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.7% | +70.0% | +41.9% | +35.0% | +70.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +28.1% | +8.9% | +9.6% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +15.9% | +5.3% | +7.5% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +44.3% | +2.0% | +8.6% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | — | +11.5% | +24.3% | +14.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | -107.8% | +20.4% | +26.3% | -4.2% |
Valuation Metrics
GOOS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, WRLD trades at a 84% valuation discount to SVV's 58.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.26x vs FIVE's 1.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $753M | $19.4B | $12.2B | $549M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $1.3B | $22.2B | $13.5B | $849M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.64x | 9.17x | 32.24x | 34.25x | 16.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.66x | 21.17x | 31.13x | 35.01x | 14.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | — | 1.42x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 7.53x | 17.49x | 20.83x | 5.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 1.33x | 1.68x | 2.56x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.07x | 1.87x | 5.05x | 5.61x | 2.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.17x | 3.01x | 113.08x | 29.68x | 2.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WRLD leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $4 for GOOS. FIVE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.93x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SVV's 1.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs FIVE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +10.8% | +29.7% | +18.1% | +3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +4.0% | +6.5% | +7.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.2% | +12.1% | +10.3% | +9.9% | +12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +16.3% | +12.0% | +11.2% | +13.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.55x | 1.20x | 1.03x | 0.93x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $587M | $516M | $2.8B | $1.3B | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $10M | $1.2B | $724M | $334M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $673M | $526M | $4.0B | $2.0B | $743M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 1.13x | 11.36x | — | 1.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FIVE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIVE five years ago would be worth $11,260 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,754 for GOOS. Over the past 12 months, FIVE leads with a +169.2% total return vs SVV's -27.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BURL at 18.9% vs SVV's -29.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.1% | +5.5% | +2.8% | +14.4% | -11.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | +12.8% | +25.1% | +169.2% | +43.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +32.8% | +68.1% | +12.5% | -42.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +11.3% | -7.4% | +12.6% | -72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.2% | +266.2% | +440.2% | +448.6% | -25.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -29.0% | +9.9% | +18.9% | +4.0% | -16.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SVV and FIVE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SVV is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVE's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FIVE currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs SVV's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.31x | 1.29x | 1.91x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.89 | $185.48 | $351.85 | $251.63 | $15.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.91 | $110.00 | $218.52 | $81.24 | $8.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +80.6% | +87.1% | +87.9% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.0 | 53.8 | 44.5 | 53.6 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 160K | 721K | 1.1M | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SVV and BURL and GOOS each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SVV as "Buy", WRLD as "Hold", BURL as "Buy", FIVE as "Buy", GOOS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 86.7% upside for SVV (target: $15) vs -0.8% for FIVE (target: $219).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.33 | — | $340.71 | $219.47 | $19.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 35 | 50 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +7.2% | +1.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WRLD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GOOS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SVV vs WRLD vs BURL vs FIVE vs GOOS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) is the stronger pick with 22. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (21. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
On trailing P/E, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus Savers Value Village, Inc. at 58. 6x. On forward P/E, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: World Acceptance Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Five Below, Inc. 's 1. 46x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
Over the past 5 years, Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) delivered a total return of +12. 6%, compared to -72. 5% for Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVE returned +453. 3% versus SVV's -64. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Savers Value Village, Inc.
(SVV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 09β versus Five Below, Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning FIVE is approximately 76% more volatile than SVV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 93% versus 155% for Savers Value Village, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) is pulling ahead at 22. 9% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Canada Goose Holdings Inc. grew EPS 70. 2% year-over-year, compared to -17. 6% for Savers Value Village, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
9% net margin versus 1. 3% for Savers Value Village, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WRLD leads at 28. 1% versus 7. 3% for BURL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SVV leads at 79. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Five Below, Inc. 's 1. 46x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Canada Goose Holdings Inc. (GOOS) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 35. 0x for Five Below, Inc. — 20. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SVV: 86. 7% to $15. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SVV or WRLD or BURL or FIVE or GOOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Burlington Stores, Inc.
(BURL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 29), +436. 5% 10Y return). Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BURL: +436. 5%, FIVE: +453. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SVV and WRLD and BURL and FIVE and GOOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (SVV (Consumer Cyclical) and WRLD (Financial Services) and BURL (Consumer Cyclical) and FIVE (Consumer Cyclical) and GOOS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SVV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIVE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GOOS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.