Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $21.82B | $5.10B | $17.52B | $6.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $31.23B | $7.49B | $24.97B | $5.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $380M | $1.04B | $-3.35B | $506M |
| Gross Margin | 18.4% | 20.9% | 27.8% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 8.7% | -10.5% | 13.5% |
| Forward P/E | 17.2x | 8.8x | 21.8x | 12.4x |
| Total Debt | $13.77B | $4.85B | $10.80B | $4.10B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $892M | $378M | $1.15B | $344M |
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) | 100 | 148.4 | +48.4% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
| International Paper… (IP) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.2%
- 64.1% 10Y total return vs SON's 48.6%
- 53.0% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.62 vs 9.73
- 13.8% margin vs IP's -13.4%
IP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, Low D/E 72.9%, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 1.20, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.28x
- 5.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.0%
SEE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.32 vs SW's 1.35
- +44.2% vs IP's -19.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs SEE's -0.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.62 vs 9.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs IP's -13.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs SW's 1.35 | |
| Dividends | 5.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.2% vs IP's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs IP's -8.5%, ROIC 6.2% vs -11.3% |
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SEE leads in 3 of 6 categories
SON leads 1 • SW leads 1 • IP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SW is the larger business by revenue, generating $31.2B annually — 5.8x SEE's $5.4B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IP's -13.4%. On growth, SEE holds the edge at +2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $31.2B | $7.5B | $25.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.8B | $1.2B | $154M | $965M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $380M | $1.0B | -$3.4B | $506M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.0B | $266M | $553M | $459M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +20.9% | +27.8% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +8.7% | -10.5% | +13.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +13.8% | -13.4% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +3.6% | +2.2% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | -1.9% | +1.2% | +2.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -83.6% | +23.6% | +145.8% | +16.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 61% valuation discount to SW's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SON offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.8B | $5.1B | $17.5B | $6.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.7B | $9.6B | $27.2B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.30x | 12.99x | -4.93x | 12.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.23x | 8.84x | 21.80x | 12.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.92x | — | 9.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.27x | 7.77x | 1293.97x | 14.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.68x | 0.70x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.19x | 1.42x | 1.18x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.37x | 12.99x | — | 13.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $-20 for IP. IP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.73x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SW scores 7/9 vs IP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +30.0% | -20.4% | +48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +9.0% | -8.5% | +7.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.4% | +6.2% | -11.3% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.0% | +8.3% | -11.6% | +14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.75x | 1.34x | 0.73x | 3.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12.9B | $4.5B | $9.7B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $892M | $378M | $1.1B | $344M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.8B | $4.9B | $10.8B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.38x | 4.60x | -8.89x | 1.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,339 for IP. Over the past 12 months, SEE leads with a +44.2% total return vs IP's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SW at 17.8% vs SON's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.3% | +17.7% | -15.5% | +2.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.4% | +21.9% | -19.6% | +44.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.4% | -3.2% | +20.7% | +2.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.1% | -9.7% | -26.6% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.1% | +48.6% | +29.2% | +4.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.8% | -1.1% | +6.5% | +0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SW's 1.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs IP's 58.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.35x | 0.53x | 1.20x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $52.65 | $58.43 | $56.13 | $44.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.73 | $38.65 | $29.45 | $28.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.1% | +88.5% | +58.9% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.2 | 50.8 | 46.2 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 1.1M | 6.8M | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SON and IP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SW as "Buy", SON as "Buy", IP as "Buy", SEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.3% upside for IP (target: $46) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, IP offers the higher dividend yield at 5.59% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $54.14 | $59.00 | $46.40 | $43.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 21 | 29 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +4.0% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 30 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.46 | $2.09 | $1.85 | $0.81 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
SEE leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SON leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SW vs SON vs IP vs SEE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SW or SON or IP or SEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Smurfit Westrock Plc at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -26. 6% for International Paper Company (IP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SW returned +64. 1% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Smurfit Westrock Plc's 1. 35β — meaning SW is approximately 317% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Paper Company (IP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 73% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smurfit Westrock Plc (SW) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus -0. 6% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -527. 4% for International Paper Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SW leads at 35. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus -14. 1% for International Paper Company — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus -11. 3% for IP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SEE leads at 29. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SW or SON or IP or SEE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for International Paper Company — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IP: 40. 3% to $46. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — SW or SON or IP or SEE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
International Paper Company (IP) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).
09Is SW or SON or IP or SEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, SW: +64. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SW and SON and IP and SEE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SW is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock; IP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.