Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SWBI
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$655M
5Y Perf.+62.0%
BA
The Boeing Company

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$182.12B
5Y Perf.+58.4%
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$118.09B
5Y Perf.+31.9%
GD
General Dynamics Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$94.02B
5Y Perf.+136.8%
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$34.40B
5Y Perf.+462.0%

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SWBI logoSWBI
BA logoBA
LMT logoLMT
GD logoGD
AXON logoAXON
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$655M$182.12B$118.09B$94.02B$34.40B
Revenue (TTM)$486M$92.18B$75.11B$53.81B$2.98B
Net Income (TTM)$12M$2.27B$4.79B$4.34B$206M
Gross Margin26.4%4.8%9.8%15.2%59.3%
Operating Margin4.6%-5.9%9.9%10.2%1.3%
Forward P/E53.6x4979.1x17.1x21.1x55.0x
Total Debt$115M$54.43B$21.70B$9.79B$1.91B
Cash & Equiv.$25M$10.92B$4.12B$2.33B$1.20B

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXONLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SWBI
BA
LMT
GD
AXON
StockMay 20May 26Return
Smith & Wesson Bran… (SWBI)100162.0+62.0%
The Boeing Company (BA)100158.4+58.4%
Lockheed Martin Cor… (LMT)100131.9+31.9%
General Dynamics Co… (GD)100236.8+136.8%
Axon Enterprise, In… (AXON)100562.0+462.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LMT leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. BA and GD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SWBI
Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

SWBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 30.8%, current ratio 4.16x
  • Beta 0.74, yield 3.5%, current ratio 4.16x
  • 3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • +65.8% vs AXON's -29.1%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BA
The Boeing Company
The Growth Play

BA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
  • 34.5% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
Best for: growth exposure
LMT
Lockheed Martin Corporation
The Income Pick

LMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
  • Lower P/E (17.1x vs 55.0x)
  • Beta 0.12 vs AXON's 1.19
  • 8.0% ROA vs BA's 1.4%, ROIC 23.9% vs -9.5%
Best for: income & stability
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
The Quality Compounder

GD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.

  • 8.1% margin vs BA's 2.5%
Best for: quality
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AXON is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 22.0% 10Y total return vs GD's 175.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBA logoBA34.5% revenue growth vs SWBI's -11.4%
ValueLMT logoLMTLower P/E (17.1x vs 55.0x)
Quality / MarginsGD logoGD8.1% margin vs BA's 2.5%
Stability / SafetyLMT logoLMTBeta 0.12 vs AXON's 1.19
DividendsSWBI logoSWBI3.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LMT's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SWBI logoSWBI+65.8% vs AXON's -29.1%
Efficiency (ROA)LMT logoLMT8.0% ROA vs BA's 1.4%, ROIC 23.9% vs -9.5%

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SWBISmith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
FY 2024
Product One
71.3%$382M
Product Two
21.7%$116M
Other Products And Services
7.0%$37M
BAThe Boeing Company
FY 2025
Commercial Airplanes Segment
100.0%$41.5B
LMTLockheed Martin Corporation
FY 2025
Aeronautics
40.3%$30.3B
Rotary and Mission Systems
23.1%$17.3B
Missiles And Fire Control
19.3%$14.4B
Space
17.4%$13.0B
GDGeneral Dynamics Corporation
FY 2025
Marine Systems
31.8%$16.7B
Technologies
25.6%$13.5B
Aerospace
24.9%$13.1B
Combat Systems
17.6%$9.2B
AXONAxon Enterprise, Inc.
FY 2025
Software And Sensors Segment
43.3%$1.2B
TASER X2
32.9%$914M
Axon Body
14.3%$397M
Platform Solutions
9.6%$266M

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSWBILAGGINGGD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — SWBI and GD and AXON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 189.6x SWBI's $486M. GD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BA's 2.5%. On growth, AXON holds the edge at +33.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$486M$92.2B$75.1B$53.8B$3.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$30M-$3.4B$8.7B$6.2B$97M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$12M$2.3B$4.8B$4.3B$206M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$73M-$1.0B$5.7B$6.2B$20M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.4%+4.8%+9.8%+15.2%+59.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.6%-5.9%+9.9%+10.2%+1.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.5%+2.5%+6.4%+8.1%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+15.0%-1.1%+7.5%+11.5%+0.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.1%+14.0%+0.3%+10.3%+33.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+122.4%+31.3%-11.5%+12.0%+89.8%
Evenly matched — SWBI and GD and AXON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.5x trailing earnings, GD trades at a 92% valuation discount to AXON's 282.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWBI's 13.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AXON's 1664.9x.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Market CapShares × price$655M$182.1B$118.1B$94.0B$34.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$745M$225.6B$135.7B$101.5B$35.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS49.10x93.16x23.84x22.49x282.71x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.53.56x4979.09x17.12x21.08x54.97x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate3.19x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.37x16.07x16.81x1664.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.38x2.04x1.57x1.79x12.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.76x32.27x17.68x3.72x13.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.09x23.75x458.11x
SWBI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — SWBI and LMT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $3 for SWBI. SWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GD scores 8/9 vs SWBI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.3%+2.9%+74.5%+17.4%+6.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.2%+1.4%+8.0%+7.5%+3.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.1%-9.5%+23.9%+12.5%-1.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.9%-9.1%+21.3%+13.6%-1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936686
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.31x9.97x3.23x0.38x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$90M$43.5B$17.6B$7.5B$709M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$25M$10.9B$4.1B$2.3B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$115M$54.4B$21.7B$9.8B$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense5.17x1.89x6.08x18.94x1.18x
Evenly matched — SWBI and LMT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AXON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AXON five years ago would be worth $31,683 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,610 for SWBI. Over the past 12 months, SWBI leads with a +65.8% total return vs AXON's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXON at 24.4% vs BA's 5.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+48.9%+1.4%+3.8%+2.1%-24.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.8%+24.5%+11.6%+31.3%-29.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+36.4%+17.1%+22.2%+73.2%+92.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.9%-1.9%+46.9%+92.4%+216.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.7%+94.6%+156.2%+175.5%+2200.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.9%+5.4%+6.9%+20.1%+24.4%
AXON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LMT and GD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AXON's 1.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GD currently trades 94.0% from its 52-week high vs AXON's 48.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.74x0.97x0.12x0.56x1.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$15.79$254.35$692.00$369.70$885.92
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.73$176.77$410.11$267.39$339.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.3%+90.8%+74.0%+94.0%+48.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.756.928.057.740.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded596K6.5M1.5M1.3M1.0M
Evenly matched — LMT and GD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SWBI and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SWBI as "Buy", BA as "Buy", LMT as "Buy", GD as "Buy", AXON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for AXON (target: $727) vs 3.5% for SWBI (target: $15). For income investors, SWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.53% vs BA's 0.19%.

MetricSWBI logoSWBISmith & Wesson Br…BA logoBAThe Boeing CompanyLMT logoLMTLockheed Martin C…GD logoGDGeneral Dynamics …AXON logoAXONAxon Enterprise, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$15.25$263.67$635.11$408.83$726.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts454373421
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.5%+0.2%+2.6%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises502312
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.52$0.43$13.50$5.82
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.9%0.0%+2.5%+0.7%0.0%
Evenly matched — SWBI and LMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

SWBI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). AXON leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallSmith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SWBI vs BA vs LMT vs GD vs AXON: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). General Dynamics Corporation (GD) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

On trailing P/E, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the cheapest at 22.

5x versus Axon Enterprise, Inc. at 282. 7x. On forward P/E, Lockheed Martin Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

Over the past 5 years, Axon Enterprise, Inc.

(AXON) delivered a total return of +216. 8%, compared to -13. 9% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AXON returned +22. 0% versus SWBI's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

12β versus Axon Enterprise, Inc. 's 1. 19β — meaning AXON is approximately 867% more volatile than LMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.

5% versus -11. 4% for Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (SWBI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for Axon Enterprise, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AXON leads at 32. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

0% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMT leads at 10. 3% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AXON leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) trades at 17.

1x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4962. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AXON: 70. 2% to $726. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON?

In this comparison, SWBI (3.

5% yield), LMT (2. 6% yield), GD (1. 7% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. AXON does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SWBI or BA or LMT or GD or AXON better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

12), 2. 6% yield, +156. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMT: +156. 2%, AXON: +22. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SWBI and BA and LMT and GD and AXON?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SWBI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LMT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AXON is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SWBI, LMT, GD pay a dividend while BA, AXON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SWBI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LMT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AXON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SWBI and BA and LMT and GD and AXON on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SWBI: 17.1% · BA: 14.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SWBI: 2.5% · BA: 2.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SWBI: 49.1x · BA: 93.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.