Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SYBX
Synlogic, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-98.4%
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.92B
5Y Perf.+200.3%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.53B
5Y Perf.+12.8%
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.47B
5Y Perf.+227.1%
MKSI
MKS Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.25B
5Y Perf.+196.5%

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SYBX logoSYBX
ACMR logoACMR
IMVT logoIMVT
ICHR logoICHR
MKSI logoMKSI
IndustryBiotechnologySemiconductorsBiotechnologySemiconductorsHardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$7M$3.92B$5.53B$2.47B$20.25B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$901M$0.00$959M$4.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$94M$-464M$-51M$327M
Gross Margin44.4%11.3%45.2%
Operating Margin12.1%-3.8%14.8%
Forward P/E30.8x54.0x27.3x
Total Debt$0.00$303M$98K$186M$4.69B
Cash & Equiv.$15M$766M$714M$98M$675M

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SYBX
ACMR
IMVT
ICHR
MKSI
StockMay 20May 26Return
Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX)1001.6-98.4%
ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)100300.3+200.3%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100112.8+12.8%
Ichor Holdings, Ltd. (ICHR)100327.1+227.1%
MKS Inc. (MKSI)100296.5+196.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACMR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MKS Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. IMVT and ICHR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SYBX
Synlogic, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SYBX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ACMR
ACM Research, Inc.
The Growth Play

ACMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
  • 30.7% 10Y total return vs MKSI's 7.5%
  • 15.2% revenue growth vs SYBX's -100.0%
  • 10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
  • Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
  • Beta 1.37 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ICHR
Ichor Holdings, Ltd.
The Momentum Pick

ICHR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +329.1% vs SYBX's -46.4%
Best for: momentum
MKSI
MKS Inc.
The Income Pick

MKSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
  • Lower P/E (27.3x vs 54.0x)
  • 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACMR logoACMR15.2% revenue growth vs SYBX's -100.0%
ValueMKSI logoMKSILower P/E (27.3x vs 54.0x)
Quality / MarginsACMR logoACMR10.4% margin vs ICHR's -5.3%
Stability / SafetyIMVT logoIMVTBeta 1.37 vs ICHR's 3.93, lower leverage
DividendsMKSI logoMKSI0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)ICHR logoICHR+329.1% vs SYBX's -46.4%
Efficiency (ROA)ACMR logoACMR3.9% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SYBXSynlogic, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ACMRACM Research, Inc.
FY 2025
Total Single Wafer and Semi-Critical Cleaning Equipment
69.5%$626M
ECP Front End And Packaging Furnace And Other Technologies
22.1%$200M
Advanced Packaging (exclude ECP), Services & Spares
8.4%$76M
IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ICHRIchor Holdings, Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

MKSIMKS Inc.
FY 2025
Product
87.4%$3.4B
Service
12.6%$495M

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACMRLAGGINGICHR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MKSI and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $4.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICHR's -5.3%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$901M$0$959M$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$126M-$487M-$11M$945M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M$94M-$464M-$51M$327M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$69M-$423M-$17M$401M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+44.4%+11.3%+45.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.1%-3.8%+14.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+10.4%-5.3%+8.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.6%-1.7%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+9.4%+4.7%+15.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.2%-76.1%+19.7%+46.2%+53.2%
MKSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 37% valuation discount to MKSI's 68.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MKSI's 26.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACMR's 27.5x.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Market CapShares × price$7M$3.9B$5.5B$2.5B$20.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$8M$3.5B$4.8B$2.6B$24.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-7.50x43.21x-9.97x-46.25x68.83x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.81x53.98x27.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.22x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.49x26.70x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.35x2.61x5.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.62x2.06x5.83x3.67x7.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.74x
Evenly matched — ICHR and MKSI each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-47 for IMVT. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.4%+6.1%-47.1%-7.5%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.0%+3.9%-44.1%-5.2%+3.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.0%-3.9%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-32.6%+6.6%-66.1%-4.7%+7.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–922236
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.00x0.28x1.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$15M-$463M-$714M$87M$4.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$15M$766M$714M$98M$675M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$303M$98,000$186M$4.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense20.44x-5.97x2.84x
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ACMR five years ago would be worth $23,344 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $127 for SYBX. Over the past 12 months, ICHR leads with a +329.1% total return vs SYBX's -46.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs SYBX's -58.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-48.7%+31.9%+5.1%+249.0%+78.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-46.4%+195.6%+96.1%+329.1%+306.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-92.9%+487.9%+40.9%+151.1%+266.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.7%+133.4%+62.4%+28.9%+66.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.0%+3065.8%+173.6%+629.1%+750.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-58.5%+80.5%+12.1%+35.9%+54.1%
ACMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IMVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICHR's 3.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICHR currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs SYBX's 30.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x3.17x1.36x3.78x2.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.96$71.65$30.09$72.87$326.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.54$19.26$13.36$13.12$71.49
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+30.6%+82.6%+90.5%+97.7%+92.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.660.760.266.965.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K1.2M1.4M795K1.2M
Evenly matched — IMVT and ICHR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ICHR as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs -23.3% for ICHR (target: $55). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.

MetricSYBX logoSYBXSynlogic, Inc.ACMR logoACMRACM Research, Inc.IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.ICHR logoICHRIchor Holdings, L…MKSI logoMKSIMKS Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$75.00$45.50$54.60$294.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts10231429
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises310
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.11$0.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%+0.2%
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MKSI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.

Best OverallACM Research, Inc. (ACMR)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SYBX vs ACMR vs IMVT vs ICHR vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus MKS Inc. at 68. 8x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

Over the past 5 years, ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) delivered a total return of +133. 4%, compared to -98. 7% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus SYBX's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Ichor Holdings, Ltd. 's 3. 78β — meaning ICHR is approximately 178% more volatile than IMVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -100. 0% for Synlogic, Inc. (SYBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Synlogic, Inc. grew EPS 95. 8% year-over-year, compared to -140. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

ACM Research, Inc.

(ACMR) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 4% net margin versus -5. 6% for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -4. 1% for ICHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACMR leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 27. 3x forward P/E versus 54. 0x for Ichor Holdings, Ltd. — 26. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67. 2% to $45. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI?

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SYBX, IMVT, ICHR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SYBX or ACMR or IMVT or ICHR or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+190. 9% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMVT: +190. 9%, ACMR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SYBX and ACMR and IMVT and ICHR and MKSI?

These companies operate in different sectors (SYBX (Healthcare) and ACMR (Technology) and IMVT (Healthcare) and ICHR (Technology) and MKSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SYBX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SYBX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACMR

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ICHR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MKSI

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SYBX and ACMR and IMVT and ICHR and MKSI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SYBX: -100.0% · ACMR: 9.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.