SYF vs MA

For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synchrony Financial (SYF) a "Buy" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the cheapest at 8.

0x versus Mastercard Incorporated at 30. 3x. On forward P/E, Synchrony Financial is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Synchrony Financial wins at 0. 25x versus Mastercard Incorporated's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Synchrony Financial (SYF) delivered a total return of +72.

2%, compared to +36. 8% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus SYF's +176. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

67β versus Synchrony Financial's 1. 52β — meaning SYF is approximately 128% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Synchrony Financial (SYF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 91% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.

4% versus -7. 9% for Synchrony Financial (SYF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastercard Incorporated grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to 8. 7% for Synchrony Financial. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the more profitable company, earning 45.

6% net margin versus 18. 6% for Synchrony Financial — meaning it keeps 45. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MA leads at 59. 2% versus 24. 2% for SYF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Synchrony Financial (SYF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Mastercard Incorporated's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Synchrony Financial (SYF) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Mastercard Incorporated — 17. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MA: 31. 1% to $656. 87.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Synchrony Financial (SYF) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Synchrony Financial (SYF) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, SYF: +176. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SYF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.