Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $771M | $760M | $8.97B | $143M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.66B | $5.85B | $4.99B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $-374M | $367M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 54.4% | 67.5% | 55.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.7% | -9.1% | 9.0% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 18.1x | — | 16.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $333M | $492M | $804M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.77B | $1.32B | $1.61B | $31M |
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 20.2 | -79.8% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.7% |
| New Oriental Educat… (EDU) | 100 | 47.0 | -53.0% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 8.9%, current ratio 2.86x
GOTU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0%
EDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 1.1%
- 47.3% 10Y total return vs TAL's 27.3%
- Beta 0.82, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.58x
- Better valuation composite
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs GOTU's -39.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.4% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs CHGG's 2.97, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs GOTU's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 9.9% vs -13.4% |
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EDU leads in 3 of 6 categories
TAL leads 1 • GOTU leads 0 • CHGG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TAL and EDU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 18.3x CHGG's $319M. EDU is the more profitable business, keeping 7.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.7B | $5.8B | $5.0B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $72M | -$378M | $563M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | -$374M | $367M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $441M | $0 | $737M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.4% | +67.5% | +55.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | -9.1% | +9.0% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -6.4% | +7.4% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.6% | +1.7% | +14.8% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.7% | +32.9% | +6.1% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | +66.7% | 0.0% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 63% valuation discount to EDU's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EDU's 15.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $771M | $760M | $9.0B | $143M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$667M | $638M | $8.2B | $196M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.05x | -4.86x | 24.50x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.12x | — | 16.25x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -16.38x | — | 15.25x | 12.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 1.12x | 1.83x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.20x | 2.67x | 2.31x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.70x | 64.81x | 14.07x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EDU delivers a 9.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. TAL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EDU scores 7/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | -21.8% | +9.1% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.1% | -6.8% | +4.8% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | -47.8% | +9.9% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.2% | -39.9% | +9.5% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 0.25x | 0.20x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.6B | -$829M | -$809M | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $1.3B | $1.6B | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $333M | $492M | $804M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1570.90x | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TAL and EDU and CHGG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EDU five years ago would be worth $3,854 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs GOTU's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.8% | -19.3% | -2.5% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.9% | -39.4% | +19.4% | +79.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.2% | -32.3% | +37.2% | -87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.7% | -92.4% | -61.5% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.3% | -81.2% | +47.3% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.7% | -12.2% | +11.1% | -49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
EDU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDU currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs GOTU's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.99x | 0.82x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.37 | $4.56 | $64.97 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.04 | $1.84 | $41.62 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +43.2% | +86.7% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.3 | 52.7 | 54.8 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 395K | 689K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
EDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TAL as "Hold", GOTU as "Hold", EDU as "Buy", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs 20.7% for EDU (target: $68). EDU is the only dividend payer here at 1.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $2.94 | $68.00 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 10 | 24 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.61 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +4.0% | +5.0% | 0.0% |
EDU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). TAL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TAL vs GOTU vs EDU vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. (EDU) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) delivered a total return of -61. 5%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EDU returned +47. 3% versus GOTU's -81. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 262% more volatile than EDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TAL Education Group (TAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EDU leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EDU leads at 8. 7% versus -26. 0% for GOTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GOTU leads at 68. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 18. 1x for TAL Education Group — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG?
In this comparison, EDU (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TAL, GOTU, CHGG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAL or GOTU or EDU or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Oriental Education & Technology Group Inc.
(EDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 1. 1% yield). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EDU: +47. 3%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAL and GOTU and EDU and CHGG?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EDU pays a dividend while TAL, GOTU, CHGG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.