Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TAOP
Taoping Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-99.8%
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$520M
5Y Perf.-20.6%
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • DK
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-94.7%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-26.7%
OUT
Outfront Media Inc.

REIT - Specialty

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.78B
5Y Perf.+30.2%

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TAOP logoTAOP
CCSI logoCCSI
LIQT logoLIQT
AEYE logoAEYE
OUT logoOUT
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - InfrastructureIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsSoftware - ApplicationREIT - Specialty
Market Cap$1M$520M$22M$100M$5.78B
Revenue (TTM)$36M$351M$17M$40M$1.87B
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$88M$-9M$-3M$187M
Gross Margin14.9%80.2%4.9%78.3%46.2%
Operating Margin-15.7%42.9%-50.0%-7.9%17.5%
Forward P/E5.0x26.5x
Total Debt$10M$580M$12M$721K$4.13B
Cash & Equiv.$2M$75M$5M$100M

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TAOP
CCSI
LIQT
AEYE
OUT
StockSep 21May 26Return
Taoping Inc. (TAOP)1000.2-99.8%
Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI)10079.4-20.6%
LiqTech Internation… (LIQT)1005.3-94.7%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10073.3-26.7%
Outfront Media Inc. (OUT)100130.2+30.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CCSI leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Outfront Media Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. LIQT and AEYE also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TAOP
Taoping Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, TAOP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
CCSI
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

CCSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
  • Lower P/E (5.0x vs 26.5x)
  • 25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
  • 13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1%
Best for: income & stability
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

LIQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.

  • Beta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30
Best for: stability
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Growth Play

AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
  • 14.5% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
Best for: growth exposure
OUT
Outfront Media Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • 100.2% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.69x
  • Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.69x
  • 3.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAEYE logoAEYE14.5% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
ValueCCSI logoCCSILower P/E (5.0x vs 26.5x)
Quality / MarginsCCSI logoCCSI25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
Stability / SafetyLIQT logoLIQTBeta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30
DividendsOUT logoOUT3.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OUT logoOUT+117.8% vs TAOP's -78.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CCSI logoCCSI13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1%

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TAOPTaoping Inc.
FY 2025
Product
75.0%$23M
Advertising
13.7%$4M
Revenue Project
5.8%$2M
Software
4.6%$1M
Product and Service, Other
0.8%$243,254
Service
0.2%$55,129
Other Related Parties
0.0%$3,805
CCSIConsensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Corporate Information Delivery Services
63.7%$223M
Small Office Home Office Information Delivery Services
36.3%$127M
Other Information Delivery Services
0.0%$12,000
LIQTLiqTech International, Inc.
FY 2024
Ceramics Segment
38.6%$6M
Water Segment
37.9%$6M
Plastics Segment
23.2%$3M
Corporate Segment
0.3%$49,496
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M
OUTOutfront Media Inc.
FY 2025
Static Displays
49.4%$905M
Digital Displays
23.7%$434M
Transit Franchise Contract
23.5%$431M
Other
2.9%$52M
Other Revenues
0.5%$9M

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCCSILAGGINGAEYE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

OUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 111.4x LIQT's $17M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$36M$351M$17M$40M$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$164M-$6M-$504,000$437M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M$88M-$9M-$3M$187M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$3M$112M-$7M$2M$234M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+14.9%+80.2%+4.9%+78.3%+46.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.7%+42.9%-50.0%-7.9%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-19.6%+25.1%-53.3%-7.6%+10.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-8.1%+32.0%-39.3%+5.5%+12.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.6%+1.5%+53.6%+7.9%+10.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-51.7%+21.5%+69.4%+29.0%+178.6%
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CCSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 83% valuation discount to OUT's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OUT's 20.9x.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
Market CapShares × price$1M$520M$22M$100M$5.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9M$1.0B$34M$96M$9.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x6.50x-2.59x-32.36x37.72x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.99x26.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple6.07x20.93x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x1.49x1.35x2.49x3.15x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.08x39.95x2.14x20.91x7.57x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.92x26.41x
CCSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCSI scores 5/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-46.7%+52.9%-70.0%-47.8%+26.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.7%+13.2%-29.5%-9.5%+3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-27.1%+22.2%-31.1%-42.4%+4.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-38.0%+26.8%-17.7%+6.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925244
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.50x42.14x1.17x0.15x5.63x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M$506M$12M-$5M$4.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2M$75M$5M$100M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10M$580M$12M$721,000$4.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-52.63x5.95x-13.46x-2.79x2.02x
CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

OUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OUT five years ago would be worth $15,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, OUT leads with a +117.8% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUT at 35.7% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-6.8%+30.2%+54.9%-18.7%+39.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-78.3%+26.8%+64.8%-27.9%+117.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.3%-21.8%-31.3%+20.6%+150.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-20.6%-96.1%-60.2%+57.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%-20.6%-90.9%+102.2%+100.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-80.9%-7.9%-11.8%+6.4%+35.7%
OUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LIQT and OUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OUT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.30x1.51x0.52x2.29x1.01x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$20.10$31.66$3.35$16.39$33.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.18$19.24$1.30$5.31$14.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.4%+89.3%+68.9%+49.4%+99.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.151.057.061.370.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded20K123K50K194K1.3M
Evenly matched — LIQT and OUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — TAOP and CCSI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CCSI as "Buy", OUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.6% upside for CCSI (target: $25) vs -19.8% for OUT (target: $26). OUT is the only dividend payer here at 3.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTAOP logoTAOPTaoping Inc.CCSI logoCCSIConsensus Cloud S…LIQT logoLIQTLiqTech Internati…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.OUT logoOUTOutfront Media In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$26.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts613
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — TAOP and CCSI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallConsensus Cloud Solutions, … (CCSI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Outfront Media Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

Over the past 5 years, Outfront Media Inc.

(OUT) delivered a total return of +57. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 339% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.

(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.

(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Outfront Media Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCSI: -11. 6% to $25. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?

In this comparison, OUT (3.

8% yield) pays a dividend. TAOP, CCSI, LIQT, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Outfront Media Inc.

(OUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 3. 8% yield, +100. 2% 10Y return). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OUT: +100. 2%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TAOP and CCSI and LIQT and AEYE and OUT?

These companies operate in different sectors (TAOP (Technology) and CCSI (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and AEYE (Technology) and OUT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. OUT pays a dividend while TAOP, CCSI, LIQT, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TAOP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCSI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIQT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OUT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TAOP and CCSI and LIQT and AEYE and OUT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TAOP: -2.6% · CCSI: 1.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.