Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Software - Application
REIT - Specialty
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Software - Application | REIT - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $1M | $520M | $22M | $100M | $5.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $351M | $17M | $40M | $1.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $88M | $-9M | $-3M | $187M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 80.2% | 4.9% | 78.3% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | -15.7% | 42.9% | -50.0% | -7.9% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.0x | — | — | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $580M | $12M | $721K | $4.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $75M | — | $5M | $100M |
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 73.3 | -26.7% |
| Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) | 100 | 130.2 | +30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TAOP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CCSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 26.5x)
- 25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
- 13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1%
LIQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30
AEYE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 30.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- 14.5% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
OUT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 100.2% 10Y total return vs AEYE's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 1.01, yield 3.8%, current ratio 2.69x
- 3.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs TAOP's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +117.8% vs TAOP's -78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 22.2% vs -31.1% |
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
OUT leads 1 • TAOP leads 0 • LIQT leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 111.4x LIQT's $17M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $351M | $17M | $40M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $164M | -$6M | -$504,000 | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $88M | -$9M | -$3M | $187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $112M | -$7M | $2M | $234M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +80.2% | +4.9% | +78.3% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.7% | +42.9% | -50.0% | -7.9% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.6% | +25.1% | -53.3% | -7.6% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +32.0% | -39.3% | +5.5% | +12.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +1.5% | +53.6% | +7.9% | +10.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.7% | +21.5% | +69.4% | +29.0% | +178.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CCSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 83% valuation discount to OUT's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than OUT's 20.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $520M | $22M | $100M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $1.0B | $34M | $96M | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.16x | 6.50x | -2.59x | -32.36x | 37.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.99x | — | — | 26.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.07x | — | — | 20.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 1.49x | 1.35x | 2.49x | 3.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.08x | 39.95x | 2.14x | 20.91x | 7.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.92x | — | — | 26.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. AEYE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCSI scores 5/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -46.7% | +52.9% | -70.0% | -47.8% | +26.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.7% | +13.2% | -29.5% | -9.5% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +22.2% | -31.1% | -42.4% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.0% | +26.8% | — | -17.7% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 42.14x | 1.17x | 0.15x | 5.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $506M | $12M | -$5M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $75M | — | $5M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $580M | $12M | $721,000 | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -52.63x | 5.95x | -13.46x | -2.79x | 2.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in OUT five years ago would be worth $15,792 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, OUT leads with a +117.8% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUT at 35.7% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.8% | +30.2% | +54.9% | -18.7% | +39.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.3% | +26.8% | +64.8% | -27.9% | +117.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -21.8% | -31.3% | +20.6% | +150.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -20.6% | -96.1% | -60.2% | +57.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -20.6% | -90.9% | +102.2% | +100.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -80.9% | -7.9% | -11.8% | +6.4% | +35.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and OUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OUT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 1.51x | 0.52x | 2.29x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.10 | $31.66 | $3.35 | $16.39 | $33.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $19.24 | $1.30 | $5.31 | $14.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.4% | +89.3% | +68.9% | +49.4% | +99.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.1 | 51.0 | 57.0 | 61.3 | 70.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 123K | 50K | 194K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TAOP and CCSI and AEYE each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCSI as "Buy", OUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.6% upside for CCSI (target: $25) vs -19.8% for OUT (target: $26). OUT is the only dividend payer here at 3.79% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 | — | — | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | — | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). OUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
TAOP vs CCSI vs LIQT vs AEYE vs OUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Outfront Media Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
Over the past 5 years, Outfront Media Inc.
(OUT) delivered a total return of +57. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AEYE returned +102. 2% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 339% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AudioEye, Inc.
(AEYE) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AEYE leads at 10. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for Outfront Media Inc. — 21. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCSI: -11. 6% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT?
In this comparison, OUT (3.
8% yield) pays a dividend. TAOP, CCSI, LIQT, AEYE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAOP or CCSI or LIQT or AEYE or OUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Outfront Media Inc.
(OUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01), 3. 8% yield, +100. 2% 10Y return). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OUT: +100. 2%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAOP and CCSI and LIQT and AEYE and OUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (TAOP (Technology) and CCSI (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and AEYE (Technology) and OUT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. OUT pays a dividend while TAOP, CCSI, LIQT, AEYE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.