Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TARS
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.72B
5Y Perf.+183.4%
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-41.6%
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.92B
5Y Perf.+247.7%
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.87B
5Y Perf.-44.3%
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.53B
5Y Perf.+461.1%

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TARS logoTARS
AEYE logoAEYE
LNTH logoLNTH
ALKT logoALKT
NUVL logoNUVL
IndustryBiotechnologySoftware - ApplicationDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericSoftware - ApplicationBiotechnology
Market Cap$2.72B$100M$5.92B$1.87B$7.53B
Revenue (TTM)$535M$40M$1.55B$472M$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$-48M$-3M$279M$-50M$-450M
Gross Margin90.4%78.3%60.5%57.4%
Operating Margin-9.5%-7.9%18.8%-9.3%
Forward P/E17.5x21.7x
Total Debt$94M$721K$738K$354M$0.00
Cash & Equiv.$184M$5M$359M$63M$262M

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TARS
AEYE
LNTH
ALKT
NUVL
StockJul 21May 26Return
Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS)100283.4+183.4%
AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE)10058.4-41.6%
Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH)100347.7+247.7%
Alkami Technology, … (ALKT)10055.7-44.3%
Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL)100561.1+461.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LNTH leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. NUVL also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TARS
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

TARS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
  • 146.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
Best for: growth exposure
AEYE
AudioEye, Inc.
The Technology Pick

AEYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
  • 41.9% 10Y total return vs NUVL's 446.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
  • Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
ALKT
Alkami Technology, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, ALKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
NUVL
Nuvalent, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NUVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +53.5% vs ALKT's -37.8%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTARS logoTARS146.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
ValueLNTH logoLNTHBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLNTH logoLNTH18.0% margin vs ALKT's -10.6%
Stability / SafetyLNTH logoLNTHBeta 0.47 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NUVL logoNUVL+53.5% vs ALKT's -37.8%
Efficiency (ROA)LNTH logoLNTH12.4% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 30.6% vs -32.5%

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TARSTarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
100.0%$451M
AEYEAudioEye, Inc.
FY 2024
Enterprise
100.0%$15M
LNTHLantheus Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
33.4%$1.5B
Radiopharmaceutical Oncology
21.9%$989M
PYLARIFY
21.9%$989M
Total Precision Diagnostics
10.9%$493M
DEFINITY
7.3%$330M
Techne Lite
1.9%$87M
Strategic Partnerships And Other
1.3%$59M
Other (2)
1.3%$59M
ALKTAlkami Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
SaaS Subscription Services
95.0%$422M
Implementation Services
2.8%$13M
Service, Other
2.1%$9M
NUVLNuvalent, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLNTHLAGGINGNUVL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LNTH and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, TARS holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$535M$40M$1.5B$472M$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$49M-$504,000$347M-$12M-$346M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$48M-$3M$279M-$50M-$450M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$32M$2M$372M$44M-$313M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.4%+78.3%+60.5%+57.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.5%-7.9%+18.8%-9.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-9.0%-7.6%+18.0%-10.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.9%+5.5%+24.0%+9.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+106.9%+7.9%+1.2%+28.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.0%+29.0%+76.5%-22.7%-17.8%
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$100M$5.9B$1.9B$7.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$96M$5.6B$2.2B$7.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-40.23x-32.36x26.69x-37.89x-17.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.52x21.69x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue6.03x2.49x3.84x4.20x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share7.78x20.91x5.72x5.00x5.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.73x45.09x
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-14.2%-47.8%+24.3%-14.0%-42.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-8.9%-9.5%+12.4%-5.9%-37.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-23.4%-42.4%+30.6%-8.6%-32.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.6%-17.7%+17.1%-9.3%-34.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954531
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.27x0.15x0.00x0.98x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$90M-$5M-$358M$290M-$262M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$184M$5M$359M$63M$262M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$94M$721,000$738,000$354M$0
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-18.76x-2.79x11.72x-3.73x-26.85x
LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TARS and LNTH and NUVL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,977 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +53.5% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARS at 60.1% vs LNTH's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-20.8%-18.7%+35.3%-23.1%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.1%-27.9%+13.1%-37.8%+53.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+310.3%+20.6%-4.0%+41.1%+171.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+113.3%-60.2%+314.2%-54.9%+446.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+210.8%+102.2%+4192.5%-59.5%+446.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+60.1%+6.4%-1.4%+12.2%+39.5%
Evenly matched — TARS and LNTH and NUVL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs AEYE's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.65x2.29x0.47x1.30x1.09x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$85.25$16.39$93.00$31.66$113.02
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$38.51$5.31$47.25$14.11$63.56
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+75.0%+49.4%+97.8%+55.1%+90.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.561.361.250.952.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded495K194K886K1.9M544K
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AEYE and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TARS as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 11.0% for LNTH (target: $101).

MetricTARS logoTARSTarsus Pharmaceut…AEYE logoAEYEAudioEye, Inc.LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…ALKT logoALKTAlkami Technology…NUVL logoNUVLNuvalent, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$89.33$101.00$22.00$144.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts9171214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises101
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.1%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — AEYE and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallLantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(TARS) is the stronger pick with 146. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

On forward P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.

(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -60. 2% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus ALKT's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 387% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(TARS) is pulling ahead at 146. 7% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TARS leads at 159. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVL: 41. 0% to $144. 40.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TARS and AEYE and LNTH and ALKT and NUVL?

These companies operate in different sectors (TARS (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and LNTH (Healthcare) and ALKT (Technology) and NUVL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TARS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 53%
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AEYE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ALKT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NUVL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TARS and AEYE and LNTH and ALKT and NUVL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TARS: 106.9% · AEYE: 7.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.