Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Software - Application
Biotechnology
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Software - Application | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $2.72B | $100M | $5.92B | $1.87B | $7.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $535M | $40M | $1.55B | $472M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-48M | $-3M | $279M | $-50M | $-450M |
| Gross Margin | 90.4% | 78.3% | 60.5% | 57.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9.5% | -7.9% | 18.8% | -9.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 17.5x | 21.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $94M | $721K | $738K | $354M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $184M | $5M | $359M | $63M | $262M |
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tarsus Pharmaceutic… (TARS) | 100 | 283.4 | +183.4% |
| AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) | 100 | 58.4 | -41.6% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 347.7 | +247.7% |
| Alkami Technology, … (ALKT) | 100 | 55.7 | -44.3% |
| Nuvalent, Inc. (NUVL) | 100 | 561.1 | +461.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TARS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 146.7%, EPS growth 48.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 159.5%
- 146.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
AEYE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs NUVL's 446.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
Among these 5 stocks, ALKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NUVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +53.5% vs ALKT's -37.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 146.7% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs ALKT's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs AEYE's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.5% vs ALKT's -37.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs NUVL's -37.8%, ROIC 30.6% vs -32.5% |
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories
TARS leads 0 • AEYE leads 0 • ALKT leads 0 • NUVL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH and NUVL operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALKT's -10.6%. On growth, TARS holds the edge at +106.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $535M | $40M | $1.5B | $472M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$49M | -$504,000 | $347M | -$12M | -$346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$48M | -$3M | $279M | -$50M | -$450M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$32M | $2M | $372M | $44M | -$313M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.4% | +78.3% | +60.5% | +57.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.5% | -7.9% | +18.8% | -9.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | -7.6% | +18.0% | -10.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | +5.5% | +24.0% | +9.4% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.9% | +7.9% | +1.2% | +28.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | +29.0% | +76.5% | -22.7% | -17.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $100M | $5.9B | $1.9B | $7.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.6B | $96M | $5.6B | $2.2B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -40.23x | -32.36x | 26.69x | -37.89x | -17.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 17.52x | 21.69x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.61x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.03x | 2.49x | 3.84x | 4.20x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.78x | 20.91x | 5.72x | 5.00x | 5.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.73x | 45.09x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-48 for AEYE. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALKT's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TARS scores 5/9 vs NUVL's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.2% | -47.8% | +24.3% | -14.0% | -42.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.9% | -9.5% | +12.4% | -5.9% | -37.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -23.4% | -42.4% | +30.6% | -8.6% | -32.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.6% | -17.7% | +17.1% | -9.3% | -34.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.15x | 0.00x | 0.98x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$90M | -$5M | -$358M | $290M | -$262M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $184M | $5M | $359M | $63M | $262M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $94M | $721,000 | $738,000 | $354M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.76x | -2.79x | 11.72x | -3.73x | -26.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TARS and LNTH and NUVL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NUVL five years ago would be worth $54,613 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,977 for AEYE. Over the past 12 months, NUVL leads with a +53.5% total return vs ALKT's -37.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TARS at 60.1% vs LNTH's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.8% | -18.7% | +35.3% | -23.1% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.1% | -27.9% | +13.1% | -37.8% | +53.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +310.3% | +20.6% | -4.0% | +41.1% | +171.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.3% | -60.2% | +314.2% | -54.9% | +446.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +210.8% | +102.2% | +4192.5% | -59.5% | +446.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +60.1% | +6.4% | -1.4% | +12.2% | +39.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEYE's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs AEYE's 49.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.65x | 2.29x | 0.47x | 1.30x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.25 | $16.39 | $93.00 | $31.66 | $113.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.51 | $5.31 | $47.25 | $14.11 | $63.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.0% | +49.4% | +97.8% | +55.1% | +90.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 61.3 | 61.2 | 50.9 | 52.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 495K | 194K | 886K | 1.9M | 544K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEYE and ALKT each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TARS as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", ALKT as "Buy", NUVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for NUVL (target: $144) vs 11.0% for LNTH (target: $101).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $89.33 | — | $101.00 | $22.00 | $144.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — | 17 | 12 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
TARS vs AEYE vs LNTH vs ALKT vs NUVL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is the stronger pick with 146. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
On forward P/E, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 17. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
Over the past 5 years, Nuvalent, Inc.
(NUVL) delivered a total return of +446. 1%, compared to -60. 2% for AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus ALKT's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus AudioEye, Inc. 's 2. 29β — meaning AEYE is approximately 387% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 98% for Alkami Technology, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(TARS) is pulling ahead at 146. 7% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 48. 2% year-over-year, compared to -48. 9% for Nuvalent, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TARS leads at 159. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -14. 7% for Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -15. 7% for TARS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TARS leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) trades at 17. 5x forward P/E versus 21. 7x for Alkami Technology, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVL: 41. 0% to $144. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TARS or AEYE or LNTH or ALKT or NUVL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). AudioEye, Inc. (AEYE) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, AEYE: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TARS and AEYE and LNTH and ALKT and NUVL?
These companies operate in different sectors (TARS (Healthcare) and AEYE (Technology) and LNTH (Healthcare) and ALKT (Technology) and NUVL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TARS is a small-cap high-growth stock; AEYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALKT is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.