Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$218M
5Y Perf.+159.3%
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$277M
5Y Perf.+101.8%
NN
NextNav Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.68B
5Y Perf.+874.9%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$6M
5Y Perf.-99.0%
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.77B
5Y Perf.+71.3%

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TAYD logoTAYD
TWIN logoTWIN
NN logoNN
AIXI logoAIXI
BBAI logoBBAI
IndustryIndustrial - MachineryIndustrial - MachineryInternet Content & InformationSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$218M$277M$2.68B$6M$19.77B
Revenue (TTM)$48M$364M$5M$115M$127M
Net Income (TTM)$10M$27M$-189M$-53M$-289M
Gross Margin46.1%28.2%-256.2%64.3%25.8%
Operating Margin21.5%4.3%-15.4%-44.2%-68.3%
Forward P/E16.6x26.3x
Total Debt$0.00$49M$15M$46M$24M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$16M$45M$847K$87M

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TAYD
TWIN
NN
AIXI
BBAI
StockMar 23May 26Return
Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD)100259.3+159.3%
Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN)100201.8+101.8%
NextNav Inc. (NN)100974.9+874.9%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)1001.0-99.0%
BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI)100171.3+71.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TAYD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Twin Disc, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. AIXI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TAYD
Taylor Devices, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

TAYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 224.5% 10Y total return vs NN's 103.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 5.88x
  • Beta 0.60, current ratio 5.88x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
TWIN
Twin Disc, Incorporated
The Income Pick

TWIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 0.9%
  • 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +161.3% vs AIXI's -83.7%
Best for: income & stability
NN
NextNav Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

NN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: communication services exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Growth Play

AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
  • 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
Best for: growth exposure
BBAI
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAIXI logoAIXI18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
ValueTAYD logoTAYDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsTAYD logoTAYD20.8% margin vs NN's -41.4%
Stability / SafetyTAYD logoTAYDBeta 0.60 vs BBAI's 3.31
DividendsTWIN logoTWIN0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TWIN logoTWIN+161.3% vs AIXI's -83.7%
Efficiency (ROA)TAYD logoTAYD13.9% ROA vs NN's -73.1%

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TAYDTaylor Devices, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TWINTwin Disc, Incorporated
FY 2025
Marine and Propulsion Systems
59.0%$201M
Land Based Transmissions
23.5%$80M
Industrial
12.2%$42M
Other
5.3%$18M
NNNextNav Inc.
FY 2025
Commercial Services
100.0%$4M
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M
BBAIBigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$158M

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTAYDLAGGINGBBAI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TWIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $364M annually — 79.5x NN's $5M. TAYD is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, TAYD holds the edge at +198.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$48M$364M$5M$115M$127M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$12M$30M-$62M-$49M-$75M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$10M$27M-$189M-$53M-$289M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M$774,000-$51M-$2M-$56M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+46.1%+28.2%-2.6%+64.3%+25.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+21.5%+4.3%-15.4%-44.2%-68.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+20.8%+7.3%-41.4%-45.9%-2.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+19.6%+0.2%-11.2%-2.0%-44.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+198.6%+19.0%-50.5%-64.9%-0.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.2%+3.1%-85.2%-29.9%+52.0%
TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, TWIN's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TAYD's 19.1x.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$218M$277M$2.7B$6M$19.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$217M$310M$2.6B$51M$19.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.10x-137.36x-13.94x-0.38x-5.10x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.60x26.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple19.09x12.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.71x0.81x585.83x0.09x154.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.75x1.62x24.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF44.78x31.44x
TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

TWIN delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWIN's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWIN scores 5/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.7%+15.3%-50.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+13.9%+7.1%-73.1%-65.3%-35.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.2%+3.9%-34.4%-19.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.0%+4.5%-36.6%-3.4%-19.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945344
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.30x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$33M-$30M$45M-$63M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$16M$45M$846,593$87M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$49M$15M$46M$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.79x-5.64x-14.13x-18.17x
TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — TAYD and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TAYD five years ago would be worth $41,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $117 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +161.3% total return vs AIXI's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 110.2% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-19.1%+19.0%+22.0%+41.9%-28.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.6%+161.3%+42.1%-83.7%+28.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+138.0%+62.1%+829.1%-98.8%+49.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+319.0%+56.4%+98.5%-98.8%-57.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+224.5%+95.3%+103.0%-98.8%-57.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.5%+17.5%+110.2%-77.2%+14.4%
Evenly matched — TAYD and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TAYD and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TAYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.60x1.16x1.36x0.71x3.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$90.37$19.67$24.19$4.02$9.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$33.67$6.90$10.84$0.08$3.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+57.5%+97.8%+81.8%+15.2%+44.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10037.159.955.848.557.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded48K50K2.2M60.7M34.5M
Evenly matched — TAYD and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

TWIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TAYD as "Hold", TWIN as "Hold", NN as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.5% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 33.0% for NN (target: $26). TWIN is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricTAYD logoTAYDTaylor Devices, I…TWIN logoTWINTwin Disc, Incorp…NN logoNNNextNav Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I CorporationBBAI logoBBAIBigBear.ai Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.33$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts2434
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises132
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.16
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+0.5%0.0%0.0%0.0%
TWIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TAYD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallTaylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

On forward P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 16. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

Over the past 5 years, Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) delivered a total return of +319. 0%, compared to -98. 8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAYD returned +224. 5% versus AIXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 448% more volatile than TAYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 30% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.

8% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAYD leads at 20. 8% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43. 5% to $6. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?

In this comparison, TWIN (0.

9% yield) pays a dividend. TAYD, NN, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Taylor Devices, Inc.

(TAYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +224. 5% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAYD: +224. 5%, BBAI: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TAYD and TWIN and NN and AIXI and BBAI?

These companies operate in different sectors (TAYD (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TAYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TWIN pays a dividend while TAYD, NN, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TAYD

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 99%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TWIN

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BBAI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TAYD and TWIN and NN and AIXI and BBAI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TAYD: 198.6% · TWIN: 19.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(TAYD: 20.8% · TWIN: 7.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.