Industrial - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Internet Content & Information
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Internet Content & Information | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $218M | $277M | $2.68B | $6M | $19.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $364M | $5M | $115M | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $10M | $27M | $-189M | $-53M | $-289M |
| Gross Margin | 46.1% | 28.2% | -256.2% | 64.3% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | 21.5% | 4.3% | -15.4% | -44.2% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 26.3x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $49M | $15M | $46M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $16M | $45M | $847K | $87M |
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) | 100 | 259.3 | +159.3% |
| Twin Disc, Incorpor… (TWIN) | 100 | 201.8 | +101.8% |
| NextNav Inc. (NN) | 100 | 974.9 | +874.9% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.0 | -99.0% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 171.3 | +71.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TAYD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 224.5% 10Y total return vs NN's 103.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 5.88x
- Better valuation composite
TWIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.16, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +161.3% vs AIXI's -83.7%
NN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AIXI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 52.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.3%
- 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3%
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs NN's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs NN's -41.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +161.3% vs AIXI's -83.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.9% ROA vs NN's -73.1% |
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TAYD leads in 2 of 6 categories
TWIN leads 2 • NN leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $364M annually — 79.5x NN's $5M. TAYD is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NN's -41.4%. On growth, TAYD holds the edge at +198.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $364M | $5M | $115M | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $30M | -$62M | -$49M | -$75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $10M | $27M | -$189M | -$53M | -$289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $774,000 | -$51M | -$2M | -$56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.1% | +28.2% | -2.6% | +64.3% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +4.3% | -15.4% | -44.2% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +7.3% | -41.4% | -45.9% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +0.2% | -11.2% | -2.0% | -44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +198.6% | +19.0% | -50.5% | -64.9% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.2% | +3.1% | -85.2% | -29.9% | +52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TWIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TWIN's 12.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TAYD's 19.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $218M | $277M | $2.7B | $6M | $19.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $217M | $310M | $2.6B | $51M | $19.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.10x | -137.36x | -13.94x | -0.38x | -5.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.60x | 26.34x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.67x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.09x | 12.52x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.71x | 0.81x | 585.83x | 0.09x | 154.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.75x | 1.62x | — | — | 24.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 44.78x | 31.44x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TAYD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TWIN delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-51 for BBAI. BBAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TWIN's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TWIN scores 5/9 vs NN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +15.3% | — | — | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.9% | +7.1% | -73.1% | -65.3% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +3.9% | — | -34.4% | -19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.0% | +4.5% | -36.6% | -3.4% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.30x | — | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $33M | -$30M | $45M | -$63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $16M | $45M | $846,593 | $87M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $49M | $15M | $46M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.79x | -5.64x | -14.13x | -18.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — TAYD and NN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TAYD five years ago would be worth $41,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $117 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, TWIN leads with a +161.3% total return vs AIXI's -83.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NN at 110.2% vs AIXI's -77.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.1% | +19.0% | +22.0% | +41.9% | -28.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.6% | +161.3% | +42.1% | -83.7% | +28.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +138.0% | +62.1% | +829.1% | -98.8% | +49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +319.0% | +56.4% | +98.5% | -98.8% | -57.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +224.5% | +95.3% | +103.0% | -98.8% | -57.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.5% | +17.5% | +110.2% | -77.2% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TAYD and TWIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TAYD is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWIN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 1.16x | 1.36x | 0.71x | 3.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $90.37 | $19.67 | $24.19 | $4.02 | $9.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.67 | $6.90 | $10.84 | $0.08 | $3.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.5% | +97.8% | +81.8% | +15.2% | +44.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.1 | 59.9 | 55.8 | 48.5 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 48K | 50K | 2.2M | 60.7M | 34.5M |
Analyst Outlook
TWIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TAYD as "Hold", TWIN as "Hold", NN as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.5% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 33.0% for NN (target: $26). TWIN is the only dividend payer here at 0.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $26.33 | — | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 4 | 3 | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.16 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TAYD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TWIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
TAYD vs TWIN vs NN vs AIXI vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is the stronger pick with 18.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). Taylor Devices, Inc. (TAYD) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextNav Inc. (NN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
On forward P/E, Taylor Devices, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 16. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
Over the past 5 years, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) delivered a total return of +319. 0%, compared to -98. 8% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAYD returned +224. 5% versus AIXI's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 448% more volatile than TAYD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 30% for Twin Disc, Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) is pulling ahead at 18.
8% versus -19. 3% for NextNav Inc. (NN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Xiao-I Corporation grew EPS 52. 7% year-over-year, compared to -117. 7% for Twin Disc, Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -41. 4% for NextNav Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TAYD leads at 20. 8% versus -1535. 8% for NN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 26. 3x for Twin Disc, Incorporated — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43. 5% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI?
In this comparison, TWIN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. TAYD, NN, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TAYD or TWIN or NN or AIXI or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taylor Devices, Inc.
(TAYD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), +224. 5% 10Y return). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TAYD: +224. 5%, BBAI: -57. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TAYD and TWIN and NN and AIXI and BBAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (TAYD (Industrials) and TWIN (Industrials) and NN (Communication Services) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TAYD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TWIN pays a dividend while TAYD, NN, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.