Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Telecommunications Services
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Entertainment | Entertainment | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $133.05B | $374.00B | $67.98B | $95.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $126.52B | $45.18B | $37.21B | $125.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21.41B | $10.98B | $-2.15B | $18.60B |
| Gross Margin | 79.7% | 48.5% | 41.5% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 29.5% | -4.0% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 24.8x | 93.5x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $173.99B | $14.46B | $32.57B | $110.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18.23B | $9.03B | $4.57B | $9.48B |
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Inc. 5.35% GLB… (TBB) | 100 | 82.6 | -17.4% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TBB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.78, yield 5.3%, current ratio 0.91x
- 5.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs TBB's 30.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6%
CMCSA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 5.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NFLX's 0.75
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 93.5x)
- Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 93.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs WBD's -5.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CMCSA's 5.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs NFLX's -23.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs WBD's -2.2%, ROIC 29.8% vs 1.5% |
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
CMCSA leads 1 • TBB leads 0 • WBD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.5B annually — 3.4x WBD's $37.2B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WBD's -5.8%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $126.5B | $45.2B | $37.2B | $125.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45.1B | $30.1B | $7.5B | $35.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21.4B | $11.0B | -$2.2B | $18.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10.6B | $9.5B | $2.3B | $18.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.7% | +48.5% | +41.5% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +29.5% | -4.0% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +24.3% | -5.8% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +20.9% | +6.2% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +17.6% | -1.0% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +31.1% | -5.5% | -32.6% |
Valuation Metrics
CMCSA leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.9x trailing earnings, CMCSA trades at a 95% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CMCSA offers better value at 0.26x vs NFLX's 1.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $133.0B | $374.0B | $68.0B | $95.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $288.8B | $379.4B | $96.0B | $196.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.13x | 34.89x | 93.52x | 4.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.49x | 24.80x | — | 7.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.41x | 12.61x | 13.73x | 5.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 8.28x | 1.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 14.32x | 1.85x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.84x | 39.53x | 22.02x | 4.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-6 for WBD. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBB's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TBB scores 7/9 vs WBD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.8% | +41.3% | -5.9% | +19.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +19.8% | -2.2% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +29.8% | +1.5% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +30.5% | +1.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.35x | 0.54x | 0.88x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $155.8B | $5.4B | $28.0B | $101.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18.2B | $9.0B | $4.6B | $9.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $174.0B | $14.5B | $32.6B | $110.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.97x | 17.33x | 3.56x | 6.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,482 for CMCSA. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs NFLX's -23.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs CMCSA's -9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.0% | -3.0% | -4.9% | -8.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.3% | -23.6% | +216.8% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.9% | +166.5% | +101.5% | -26.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.2% | +75.2% | -27.8% | -45.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.8% | +875.3% | -3.7% | +15.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.2% | +38.6% | +26.3% | -9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBD and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CMCSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs NFLX's 65.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.39x | 0.90x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.10 | $134.12 | $30.00 | $36.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.92 | $75.01 | $8.06 | $25.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +65.8% | +90.4% | +71.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 35.3 | 48.9 | 37.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 94K | 44.0M | 22.2M | 28.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TBB and CMCSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TBB as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy", WBD as "Hold", CMCSA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs -1.8% for TBB (target: $21). For income investors, TBB offers the higher dividend yield at 5.26% vs CMCSA's 5.13%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.29 | $116.29 | $29.94 | $31.87 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 99 | 32 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.3% | — | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.14 | — | — | $1.35 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +7.5% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CMCSA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TBB vs NFLX vs WBD vs CMCSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
On trailing P/E, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the cheapest at 4.
9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, Comcast Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Comcast Corporation wins at 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -45. 2% for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus WBD's -3. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 331% more volatile than CMCSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 135% for AT&T Inc. 5. 35% GLB NTS 66 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TBB leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Netflix, Inc. 's 0. 75x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA?
In this comparison, TBB (5.
3% yield), CMCSA (5. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NFLX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TBB or NFLX or WBD or CMCSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 5. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMCSA: +15. 4%, WBD: -3. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TBB and NFLX and WBD and CMCSA?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TBB is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CMCSA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. TBB, CMCSA pay a dividend while NFLX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 2.1%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.