Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TC
Token Cat Limited

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$20M
5Y Perf.-99.2%
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.85B
5Y Perf.-66.4%
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.

Real Estate - Services

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.19B
5Y Perf.-73.2%
COMP
Compass, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.19B
5Y Perf.-51.4%

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TC logoTC
ZG logoZG
OPEN logoOPEN
COMP logoCOMP
IndustryInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationReal Estate - ServicesSoftware - Application
Market Cap$20M$10.85B$5.19B$5.19B
Revenue (TTM)$37M$2.69B$4.37B$8.31B
Net Income (TTM)$-148M$61M$-1.30B$14M
Gross Margin73.3%73.3%8.0%10.8%
Operating Margin-227.6%0.4%-6.6%-4.2%
Forward P/E20.2x56.5x
Total Debt$48M$536M$193M$454M
Cash & Equiv.$6M$773M$962M$199M

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TC
ZG
OPEN
COMP
StockApr 21May 26Return
Token Cat Limited (TC)1000.8-99.2%
Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG)10033.6-66.4%
Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN)10026.8-73.2%
Compass, Inc. (COMP)10048.6-51.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ZG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Token Cat Limited is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. OPEN and COMP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TC
Token Cat Limited
The Income Pick

TC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • beta 0.71
  • Beta 0.71 vs OPEN's 3.09
Best for: income & stability
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc. Class A
The Growth Play

ZG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
  • 63.6% 10Y total return vs COMP's -54.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.13x
  • Beta 1.32, current ratio 3.13x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
OPEN
Opendoor Technologies Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +6.8% vs ZG's -32.1%
Best for: momentum
COMP
Compass, Inc.
The Growth Leader

COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.

  • 23.7% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
Best for: growth
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCOMP logoCOMP23.7% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
ValueZG logoZGLower P/E (20.2x vs 56.5x)
Quality / MarginsZG logoZG2.3% margin vs TC's -403.8%
Stability / SafetyTC logoTCBeta 0.71 vs OPEN's 3.09
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)OPEN logoOPEN+6.8% vs ZG's -32.1%
Efficiency (ROA)ZG logoZG1.1% ROA vs TC's -72.7%

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TCToken Cat Limited
FY 2024
Others Member
100.0%$3M
ZGZillow Group, Inc. Class A
FY 2025
Sales Revenue
44.9%$1.9B
Residential Revenue
40.2%$1.7B
Rental Revenue
14.9%$630M
OPENOpendoor Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

COMPCompass, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLZGLAGGINGOPEN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ZG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 226.7x TC's $37M. ZG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TC's -4.0%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$37M$2.7B$4.4B$8.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$227M-$287M-$100M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$148M$61M-$1.3B$14M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$193M$333M$1.0B$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.3%+73.3%+8.0%+10.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-2.3%+0.4%-6.6%-4.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-4.0%+2.3%-29.7%+0.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.3%+12.4%+23.7%+0.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-38.8%+18.4%-32.1%+99.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.6%+5.1%-7.9%+133.3%
ZG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ZG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, ZG's 40.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 65.3x.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$20M$10.8B$5.2B$5.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$26M$10.6B$4.4B$5.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.97x495.36x-3.20x-92.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.16x56.51x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple40.65x65.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.81x4.20x1.19x0.75x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.33x4.15x6.71x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF46.15x5.00x25.55x
ZG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ZG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

ZG delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. ZG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COMP's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.5%+1.3%-129.4%+1.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-72.7%+1.1%-54.0%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.5%-16.6%-2.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-0.6%-12.3%-2.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92754
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.11x0.19x0.58x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$42M-$237M-$769M$255M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$6M$773M$962M$199M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$48M$536M$193M$454M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-60.86x1.22x-0.12x
ZG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in COMP five years ago would be worth $5,600 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $85 for TC. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +675.8% total return vs ZG's -32.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 51.8% vs TC's -63.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+22.4%-31.7%-10.4%-12.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-12.4%-32.1%+675.8%+19.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-95.0%-5.4%+165.4%+250.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.1%-60.7%-69.5%-44.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+63.6%-49.6%-54.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-63.2%-1.8%+38.4%+51.8%
COMP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — TC and COMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COMP currently trades 66.2% from its 52-week high vs TC's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.71x1.32x3.09x1.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$22.46$90.22$10.87$13.96
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.50$39.14$0.51$5.66
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+41.2%+49.7%+50.0%+66.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10029.248.351.842.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1K992K36.3M14.5M
Evenly matched — TC and COMP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: TC as "Hold", ZG as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ZG (target: $71) vs 19.5% for OPEN (target: $7).

MetricTC logoTCToken Cat LimitedZG logoZGZillow Group, Inc…OPEN logoOPENOpendoor Technolo…COMP logoCOMPCompass, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$70.67$6.50$14.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts18492610
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+6.2%+22.8%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ZG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). COMP leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallZillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) offers the better valuation at 495. 4x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class A is actually cheaper at 20. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

Over the past 5 years, Compass, Inc.

(COMP) delivered a total return of -44. 0%, compared to -99. 1% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZG returned +63. 6% versus TC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Token Cat Limited (TC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

71β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 333% more volatile than TC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 58% for Compass, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.

(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class A grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZG leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

Zillow Group, Inc.

Class A (ZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -382. 3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMP leads at -0. 4% versus -182. 9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZG leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.

Class A (ZG) trades at 20. 2x forward P/E versus 56. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 36. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ZG: 57. 6% to $70. 67.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Token Cat Limited (TC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

71)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TC: -99. 9%, OPEN: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TC and ZG and OPEN and COMP?

These companies operate in different sectors (TC (Communication Services) and ZG (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ZG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OPEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COMP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 49%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TC and ZG and OPEN and COMP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TC: -38.8% · ZG: 18.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.