Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Real Estate - Services
Software - Application
Real Estate - Services
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Internet Content & Information | Real Estate - Services | Software - Application | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $21M | $10.65B | $4.08B | $5.32B | $1.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37M | $2.69B | $3.94B | $8.31B | $5.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-148M | $61M | $-1.39B | $14M | $-128M |
| Gross Margin | 73.3% | 73.3% | 7.9% | 10.8% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -227.6% | 0.4% | -9.9% | -4.2% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.8x | — | 53.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $48M | $536M | $193M | $454M | $3.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $773M | $962M | $199M | $118M |
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Zillow Group, Inc. … (ZG) | 100 | 33.0 | -67.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Compass, Inc. (COMP) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
| Anywhere Real Estat… (HOUS) | 100 | 81.9 | -18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- beta 0.71
- Beta 0.71 vs OPEN's 3.09
ZG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 15.5%, EPS growth 118.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 11.0%, current ratio 3.13x
- Beta 1.32, current ratio 3.13x
- Better valuation composite
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs ZG's -33.7%
COMP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 23.7% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7%
HOUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -33.9% 10Y total return vs ZG's 61.3%
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.7% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs TC's -403.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs ZG's -33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs TC's -72.7% |
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZG leads in 2 of 6 categories
HOUS leads 1 • TC leads 0 • OPEN leads 0 • COMP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMP is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 226.7x TC's $37M. ZG is the more profitable business, keeping 2.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TC's -4.0%. On growth, COMP holds the edge at +99.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37M | $2.7B | $3.9B | $8.3B | $5.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $227M | -$363M | -$100M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$148M | $61M | -$1.4B | $14M | -$128M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | $333M | $1.1B | $16M | -$41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.3% | +73.3% | +7.9% | +10.8% | +47.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +0.4% | -9.9% | -4.2% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +2.3% | -35.2% | +0.2% | -2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +12.4% | +27.2% | +0.2% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.8% | +18.4% | -37.6% | +99.4% | +5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.6% | +5.1% | -50.0% | +133.3% | -2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HOUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HOUS's 18.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COMP's 66.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $10.7B | $4.1B | $5.3B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27M | $10.4B | $3.3B | $5.6B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.00x | 486.63x | -3.13x | -87.50x | -15.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.80x | — | 53.52x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.91x | — | 66.86x | 18.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.90x | 4.12x | 0.93x | 0.76x | 0.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.29x | 4.06x | 6.36x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.34x | 3.93x | 26.18x | 76.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ZG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZG delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. ZG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOUS's 1.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ZG scores 7/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.5% | +1.3% | -163.2% | +1.1% | -8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -72.7% | +1.1% | -53.6% | +0.4% | -2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.5% | -15.8% | -2.5% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -0.6% | -11.7% | -2.9% | +1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.11x | 0.19x | 0.58x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42M | -$237M | -$769M | $255M | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $773M | $962M | $199M | $118M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $536M | $193M | $454M | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -60.86x | 5.22x | -8.92x | -0.12x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COMP and HOUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOUS five years ago would be worth $9,827 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TC. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs ZG's -33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COMP at 49.1% vs TC's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | -32.9% | -12.4% | -16.7% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.2% | -33.7% | +510.1% | +14.4% | +375.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.9% | -7.0% | +159.5% | +231.4% | +227.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -63.1% | -71.6% | -48.3% | -1.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +61.3% | -50.8% | -56.6% | -33.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.8% | -2.4% | +37.4% | +49.1% | +48.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TC and HOUS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TC is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOUS currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs TC's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.32x | 3.09x | 1.79x | 1.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.46 | $90.22 | $10.87 | $13.96 | $18.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.50 | $39.14 | $0.51 | $5.66 | $3.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.5% | +48.8% | +48.9% | +62.7% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 29.2 | 51.8 | 56.2 | 65.7 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 1.0M | 36.3M | 14.5M | 11.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TC as "Hold", ZG as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", COMP as "Buy", HOUS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 63.3% upside for COMP (target: $14) vs 7.7% for HOUS (target: $19). HOUS is the only dividend payer here at 0.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $70.67 | $6.50 | $14.29 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 49 | 26 | 10 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
ZG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HOUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
TC vs ZG vs OPEN vs COMP vs HOUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is the stronger pick with 23. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) offers the better valuation at 486. 6x trailing P/E (19. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
On forward P/E, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A is actually cheaper at 19. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
Over the past 5 years, Anywhere Real Estate Inc.
(HOUS) delivered a total return of -1. 7%, compared to -99. 0% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ZG returned +61. 3% versus TC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Token Cat Limited (TC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 333% more volatile than TC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Zillow Group, Inc. Class A (ZG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 195% for Anywhere Real Estate Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass, Inc.
(COMP) is pulling ahead at 23. 7% versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zillow Group, Inc. Class A grew EPS 118. 9% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ZG leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 9% net margin versus -382. 3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOUS leads at 1. 1% versus -182. 9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZG leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Zillow Group, Inc.
Class A (ZG) trades at 19. 8x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS?
In this comparison, HOUS (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. TC, ZG, OPEN, COMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TC or ZG or OPEN or COMP or HOUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Token Cat Limited (TC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
71)). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TC: -99. 9%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TC and ZG and OPEN and COMP and HOUS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TC (Communication Services) and ZG (Communication Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and COMP (Technology) and HOUS (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 44%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.