Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Residential
REIT - Office
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $317M | $277M | $3.64B | $756M | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $98M | $403M | $252M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-12M | $148M | $-32M | $-154M |
| Gross Margin | -38.7% | 12.6% | 61.3% | 91.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | 6.1% | 48.5% | 11.5% | — |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | — | 21.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $211M | $508M | $1.16B | $1.56B | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $25M | $20M | $14M | $1.33B |
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcontinental Re… (TCI) | 100 | 176.6 | +76.6% |
| BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) | 100 | 130.0 | +30.0% |
| National Health Inv… (NHI) | 100 | 135.6 | +35.6% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.7 | -6.3% |
| Elme Communities (ELME) | 100 | 9.6 | -90.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 135.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 324.2% 10Y total return vs BRT's 217.9%
- +18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2%
Among these 5 stocks, BRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and value.
- 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 36.8% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- 5.4% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 5.6% vs -15.3%
NXRT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ELME is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 34.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47, yield 34.1%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.47 vs TCI's 0.75
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.9% FFO/revenue growth vs ELME's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.8% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs TCI's 0.75 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ELME's 34.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs ELME's -8.3%, ROIC 5.6% vs -15.3% |
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NHI leads in 2 of 6 categories
TCI leads 1 • BRT leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • ELME leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NHI and ELME operate at a comparable scale, with $403M and $0 in trailing revenue. NHI is the more profitable business, keeping 36.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, NHI holds the edge at +29.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $98M | $403M | $252M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $33M | $282M | $125M | -$44M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$12M | $148M | -$32M | -$154M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | $16M | $226M | $79M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | +12.6% | +61.3% | +91.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | +6.1% | +48.5% | +11.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | -12.5% | +36.8% | -12.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.2% | +16.2% | +56.1% | +31.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +4.2% | +29.7% | +0.5% | -4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.2% | -16.7% | +10.8% | 0.0% | -6.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TCI and BRT and NHI and NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.9x trailing earnings, TCI trades at a 8% valuation discount to NHI's 24.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NHI's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TCI's 82.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $277M | $3.6B | $756M | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $513M | $760M | $4.8B | $2.3B | -$624M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.91x | -22.31x | 24.85x | -23.65x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.97x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.37x | 20.32x | 17.16x | 18.60x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.45x | 2.86x | 9.61x | 3.01x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 1.50x | 2.29x | 2.52x | 0.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.60x | 16.52x | 9.05x | 3.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NHI delivers a 9.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-19 for ELME. TCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NHI scores 6/9 vs BRT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | -6.8% | +9.8% | -10.1% | -18.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -1.7% | +5.4% | -1.7% | -8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | +1.3% | +5.6% | +1.1% | -15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +1.6% | +8.0% | +1.5% | -10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 2.87x | 0.76x | 5.18x | 2.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $197M | $483M | $1.1B | $1.5B | -$812M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $25M | $20M | $14M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $211M | $508M | $1.2B | $1.6B | $520M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.22x | 0.51x | 3.45x | 0.47x | -3.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TCI five years ago would be worth $17,280 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, TCI leads with a +18.5% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHI at 20.2% vs NXRT's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.8% | +3.5% | -1.1% | +2.6% | -4.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +2.7% | +2.8% | -15.2% | +8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +1.0% | +73.5% | -15.5% | +13.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.8% | +7.5% | +31.0% | -23.0% | -15.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.2% | +217.9% | +58.9% | +211.1% | -11.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +0.3% | +20.2% | -5.5% | +4.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BRT and NHI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NHI is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCI's 0.75 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BRT currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs ELME's 12.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.60x | -0.09x | 0.61x | 0.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.65 | $16.69 | $90.94 | $38.30 | $17.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.26 | $13.18 | $68.80 | $23.79 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +88.2% | +82.5% | +77.8% | +12.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 56.6 | 28.0 | 71.0 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 54K | 332K | 216K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and ELME each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BRT as "Buy", NHI as "Hold", NXRT as "Hold", ELME as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 796.2% upside for ELME (target: $19) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, ELME offers the higher dividend yield at 34.11% vs NHI's 4.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $21.00 | $85.40 | $27.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 18 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.1% | +4.8% | +7.1% | +34.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.05 | $3.61 | $2.11 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
NHI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TCI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
TCI vs BRT vs NHI vs NXRT vs ELME: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME a better buy right now?
For growth investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) offers the better valuation at 22. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BRT Apartments Corp. (BRT) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
On trailing P/E, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) is the cheapest at 22. 9x versus National Health Investors, Inc. at 24. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
Over the past 5 years, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.
(TCI) delivered a total return of +72. 8%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TCI returned +313. 0% versus ELME's -11. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning TCI is approximately -918% more volatile than NHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 135. 3% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCI leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the more profitable company, earning 37. 6% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NHI leads at 51. 5% versus -12. 9% for TCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ELME: 796.
2% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME?
In this comparison, ELME (34.
1% yield), BRT (7. 1% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), NHI (4. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TCI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TCI or BRT or NHI or NXRT or ELME better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, National Health Investors, Inc.
(NHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 09), 4. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NHI: +59. 2%, TCI: +313. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCI and BRT and NHI and NXRT and ELME?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ELME is a small-cap income-oriented stock. BRT, NHI, NXRT, ELME pay a dividend while TCI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.