Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
Real Estate - Development
REIT - Residential
Real Estate - Services
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | Financial - Mortgages | Real Estate - Development | REIT - Residential | Real Estate - Services |
| Market Cap | $317M | $73M | $223M | $756M | $43.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $49M | $0.00 | $50M | $252M | $42.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $4M | $13M | $-32M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | -38.7% | — | -36.9% | 91.1% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -11.6% | — | -11.2% | 11.5% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 22.9x | 18.3x | 0.7x | — | 19.2x |
| Total Debt | $211M | $0.00 | $214M | $1.56B | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $6K | $14M | $14M | $1.86B |
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcontinental Re… (TCI) | 100 | 181.4 | +81.4% |
| Income Opportunity … (IOR) | 100 | 171.4 | +71.4% |
| American Realty Inv… (ARL) | 100 | 183.8 | +83.8% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 93.2 | -6.8% |
| CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) | 100 | 333.6 | +233.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TCI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.6%, EPS growth 135.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 24.3%, current ratio 871.66x
- Beta 0.75, current ratio 871.66x
- +18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2%
IOR is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.21 vs CBRE's 1.12
ARL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.06 vs CBRE's 1.65
- Lower P/E (0.7x vs 19.2x), PEG 0.06 vs 1.65
- 25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.62, yield 7.1%
- 7.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
CBRE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 405.3% 10Y total return vs TCI's 324.2%
- 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0%
- 4.5% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% FFO/revenue growth vs IOR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.7x vs 19.2x), PEG 0.06 vs 1.65 | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.2% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs CBRE's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.5% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 6.2% vs 1.1% |
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CBRE leads 2 • ARL leads 1 • IOR leads 1 • TCI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CBRE and IOR operate at a comparable scale, with $42.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. ARL is the more profitable business, keeping 25.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, CBRE holds the edge at +18.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $49M | $0 | $50M | $252M | $42.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $4M | $5M | $125M | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $4M | $13M | -$32M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$51M | -$338,000 | $3M | $79M | $897M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | — | -36.9% | +91.1% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.6% | — | -11.2% | +11.5% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | — | +25.2% | -12.7% | +3.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.2% | — | +5.4% | +31.2% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | — | +2.8% | +0.5% | +18.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -96.2% | +4.2% | -116.7% | 0.0% | +98.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ARL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, ARL trades at a 63% valuation discount to CBRE's 38.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ARL offers better value at 1.23x vs CBRE's 3.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $73M | $223M | $756M | $43.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $513M | $73M | $423M | $2.3B | $51.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.91x | 18.33x | 14.23x | -23.65x | 38.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 0.66x | — | 19.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | 1.23x | — | 3.27x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 82.37x | 14.46x | 68.82x | 18.60x | 24.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.45x | — | 4.46x | 3.01x | 1.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.37x | 0.58x | 0.27x | 2.52x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 9.05x | 36.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CBRE delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. TCI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBRE scores 6/9 vs IOR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.1% | +3.2% | +1.6% | -10.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +3.2% | +1.2% | -1.7% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.5% | -0.2% | -0.5% | +1.1% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | -0.3% | -0.6% | +1.5% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | — | 0.26x | 5.18x | 1.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $197M | -$6,000 | $200M | $1.5B | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $6,000 | $14M | $14M | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $211M | $0 | $214M | $1.6B | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.22x | — | 4.11x | 0.47x | 8.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CBRE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARL five years ago would be worth $17,692 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, TCI leads with a +18.5% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CBRE at 26.1% vs ARL's -10.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -37.8% | +2.3% | -15.0% | +2.6% | -8.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.5% | +0.9% | +9.1% | -15.2% | +17.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.7% | +66.3% | -27.7% | -15.5% | +100.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.8% | +45.7% | +76.9% | -23.0% | +68.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +324.2% | +155.5% | +197.4% | +211.1% | +405.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.5% | +18.5% | -10.2% | -5.5% | +26.1% |
Risk & Volatility
IOR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IOR is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBRE's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IOR currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs TCI's 61.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.21x | 1.00x | 0.62x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.65 | $19.69 | $20.00 | $38.30 | $174.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.26 | $17.50 | $11.95 | $23.79 | $118.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.4% | +91.2% | +69.0% | +77.8% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 49.4 | 40.3 | 71.0 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7K | 692 | 3K | 216K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
NXRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NXRT as "Hold", CBRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for CBRE (target: $180) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). NXRT is the only dividend payer here at 7.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $27.00 | $179.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 10 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +7.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.11 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.5% | +1.0% | +2.3% |
NXRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). CBRE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
TCI vs IOR vs ARL vs NXRT vs CBRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (0. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
On trailing P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) is the cheapest at 14. 2x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, American Realty Investors, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Realty Investors, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
Over the past 5 years, American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) delivered a total return of +76. 9%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +405. 3% versus IOR's +155. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc.
(IOR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CBRE is approximately 427% more volatile than IOR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (TCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.
(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -100. 0% for Income Opportunity Realty Investors, Inc. (IOR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Realty Investors, Inc. grew EPS 206. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TCI leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
American Realty Investors, Inc.
(ARL) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NXRT leads at 11. 1% versus -12. 9% for TCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, American Realty Investors, Inc. (ARL) trades at 0. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for CBRE Group, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CBRE: 22. 5% to $179. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE?
In this comparison, NXRT (7.
1% yield) pays a dividend. TCI, IOR, ARL, CBRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TCI or IOR or ARL or NXRT or CBRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.
(NXRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 62), 7. 1% yield, +211. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXRT: +211. 1%, ARL: +197. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TCI and IOR and ARL and NXRT and CBRE?
These companies operate in different sectors (TCI (Real Estate) and IOR (Financial Services) and ARL (Real Estate) and NXRT (Real Estate) and CBRE (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IOR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NXRT pays a dividend while TCI, IOR, ARL, CBRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.