Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
TDIC vs FUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
TDIC vs FUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $3.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-1.75B |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $14M | $5.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $83M |
Quick Verdict: TDIC vs FUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 124.1%, EPS growth -8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.49, current ratio 1.33x
- 124.1% revenue growth vs FUN's 50.6%
FUN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.83, yield 1.6%
- -37.5% 10Y total return vs TDIC's -94.2%
- Beta 1.83, yield 1.6%, current ratio 0.43x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 124.1% revenue growth vs FUN's 50.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.0% margin vs FUN's -55.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.83 vs TDIC's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -44.4% vs TDIC's -94.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.9% ROA vs FUN's -22.1%, ROIC 12.2% vs 5.1% |
TDIC vs FUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDIC vs FUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TDIC and FUN each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUN is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 68.5x TDIC's $46M. TDIC is the more profitable business, keeping 14.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FUN's -55.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$828M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | -55.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | -5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.7% |
Valuation Metrics
FUN leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FUN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TDIC's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $7.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.48x | -8.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.39x | 11.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.91x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 37.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDIC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDIC delivers a 112.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FUN. TDIC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.62x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUN's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUN scores 4/9 vs TDIC's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +112.5% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.9% | -22.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +5.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 2.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $5.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.46x | -3.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUN five years ago would be worth $4,558 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $580 for TDIC. Over the past 12 months, FUN leads with a -44.4% total return vs TDIC's -94.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUN at -19.9% vs TDIC's -61.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.7% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.2% | -44.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -48.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -54.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.2% | -37.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -61.3% | -19.9% |
Risk & Volatility
FUN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FUN is the less volatile stock with a 1.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDIC's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FUN currently trades 51.2% from its 52-week high vs TDIC's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.49x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.50 | $38.47 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $12.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.0M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FUN is the only dividend payer here at 1.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FUN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). TDIC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
TDIC vs FUN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDIC or FUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the stronger pick with 124.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 50. 6% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — TDIC or FUN?
Over the past 5 years, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) delivered a total return of -54.
4%, compared to -94. 2% for Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUN returned -37. 5% versus TDIC's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — TDIC or FUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
83β versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 49β — meaning TDIC is approximately 36% more volatile than FUN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 162% versus 2% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — TDIC or FUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is pulling ahead at 124.
1% versus 50. 6% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS -8. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 0% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — TDIC or FUN?
Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
0% net margin versus -8. 5% for Six Flags Entertainment Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUN leads at 11. 5% versus 1. 7% for TDIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUN leads at 91. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — TDIC or FUN?
In this comparison, FUN (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. TDIC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is TDIC or FUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FUN: -37. 5%, TDIC: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between TDIC and FUN?
These companies operate in different sectors (TDIC (Communication Services) and FUN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
FUN pays a dividend while TDIC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.