Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Entertainment
Leisure
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Leisure | Entertainment | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $14M | $140M | $371.57B | $1.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $122M | $45.18B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-8M | $10.98B | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 70.9% | 48.5% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | -3.2% | 29.5% | 20.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.6x | 20.5x | 24.6x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $196M | $14.46B | $2.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $38M | $9.03B | $100M |
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 15.2 | -84.8% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 165.6 | +65.6% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 172.3 | +72.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TDIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 124.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
PLBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +27.1% vs TDIC's -89.2%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.35
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 9.0% 10Y total return vs PRKS's 94.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 124.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs PLBY's -6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs TDIC's 2.60, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.1% vs TDIC's -89.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs PLBY's -2.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs -1.4% |
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories
PRKS leads 1 • TDIC leads 0 • PLBY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 986.4x TDIC's $46M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLBY's -6.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $122M | $45.2B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $2M | $30.1B | $520M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$8M | $11.0B | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $9.5B | $291M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +70.9% | +48.5% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -3.2% | +29.5% | +20.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | -6.2% | +24.3% | +9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -55.2% | -1.7% | +20.9% | +17.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.7% | +17.6% | -3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +69.3% | +31.1% | -137.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 67% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 58.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $140M | $371.6B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14M | $299M | $377.0B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.59x | -11.54x | 34.66x | 11.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.46x | 24.58x | 9.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.05x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.17x | 58.29x | 12.53x | 7.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 1.16x | 8.22x | 1.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.83x | 8.28x | 14.22x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 39.27x | 6.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDIC delivers a 112.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-79 for PLBY. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLBY's 10.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs TDIC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +112.5% | -79.3% | +41.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +17.9% | -2.7% | +19.8% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | -1.4% | +29.8% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | -1.4% | +30.5% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 10.81x | 0.54x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $159M | $5.4B | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $38M | $9.0B | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $196M | $14.5B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.46x | 0.74x | 17.33x | 2.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $18,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $362 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +27.1% total return vs TDIC's -89.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 37.2% vs TDIC's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +133.7% | -18.5% | -3.6% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.2% | +27.1% | -21.0% | -28.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -3.8% | +158.0% | -38.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -96.4% | +80.8% | -29.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -84.8% | +899.9% | +94.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -52.4% | -1.3% | +37.2% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDIC's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.4% from its 52-week high vs TDIC's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.60x | 1.95x | 0.35x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.50 | $2.75 | $134.12 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.18 | $1.13 | $75.01 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.0% | +54.5% | +65.4% | +61.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 50.1 | 30.3 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.3M | 866K | 38.9M | 950K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PLBY as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 742.0% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 31.8% for NFLX (target: $116).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.63 | $115.59 | $47.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 | 99 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.5% | +1.0% |
NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the stronger pick with 124.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +80. 8%, compared to -96. 4% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +899. 9% versus TDIC's -89. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 60β — meaning TDIC is approximately 633% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 11% for Playboy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is pulling ahead at 124.
1% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -10. 5% for Playboy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 7% for PLBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBY leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Netflix, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 742. 0% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +899. 9% 10Y return). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a higher beta of 2. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +899. 9%, TDIC: -89. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TDIC and PLBY and NFLX and PRKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (TDIC (Communication Services) and PLBY (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: TDIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.