Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
TDIC
Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-36.0%
PLBY
Playboy, Inc.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$140M
5Y Perf.-84.8%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$371.57B
5Y Perf.+65.6%
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.

Leisure

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.71B
5Y Perf.+72.3%

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
TDIC logoTDIC
PLBY logoPLBY
NFLX logoNFLX
PRKS logoPRKS
IndustryEntertainmentLeisureEntertainmentLeisure
Market Cap$14M$140M$371.57B$1.71B
Revenue (TTM)$46M$122M$45.18B$1.65B
Net Income (TTM)$6M$-8M$10.98B$150M
Gross Margin26.1%70.9%48.5%65.4%
Operating Margin1.7%-3.2%29.5%20.7%
Forward P/E17.6x20.5x24.6x9.5x
Total Debt$14M$196M$14.46B$2.35B
Cash & Equiv.$17M$38M$9.03B$100M

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

TDIC
PLBY
NFLX
PRKS
StockAug 20May 26Return
Playboy, Inc. (PLBY)10015.2-84.8%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100165.6+65.6%
United Parks & Reso… (PRKS)100172.3+72.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. PLBY and PRKS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
TDIC
Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Leader

TDIC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 124.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
Best for: growth
PLBY
Playboy, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

PLBY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +27.1% vs TDIC's -89.2%
Best for: momentum
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Income Pick

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 0.35
  • Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
  • 9.0% 10Y total return vs PRKS's 94.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
The Value Play

PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (9.5x vs 24.6x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTDIC logoTDIC124.1% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6%
ValuePRKS logoPRKSLower P/E (9.5x vs 24.6x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs PLBY's -6.2%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.35 vs TDIC's 2.60, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PLBY logoPLBY+27.1% vs TDIC's -89.2%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs PLBY's -2.7%, ROIC 29.8% vs -1.4%

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

TDICDreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

PLBYPlayboy, Inc.
FY 2025
Trademark Licensing
82.9%$343M
Consumer Products
17.1%$71M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B
PRKSUnited Parks & Resorts Inc.
FY 2025
Admission
53.1%$883M
Food Merchandise And Other Revenue
46.9%$779M

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGPLBY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 986.4x TDIC's $46M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLBY's -6.2%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$46M$122M$45.2B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2M$30.1B$520M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M$11.0B$150M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$9.5B$291M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.1%+70.9%+48.5%+65.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+1.7%-3.2%+29.5%+20.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.0%-6.2%+24.3%+9.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-55.2%-1.7%+20.9%+17.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.7%+17.6%-3.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+69.3%+31.1%-137.9%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 11.5x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 67% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 7.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 58.3x.

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Market CapShares × price$14M$140M$371.6B$1.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14M$299M$377.0B$4.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.59x-11.54x34.66x11.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.46x24.58x9.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.17x58.29x12.53x7.28x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.47x1.16x8.22x1.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.83x8.28x14.22x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.27x6.50x
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TDIC delivers a 112.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-79 for PLBY. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLBY's 10.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs TDIC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+112.5%-79.3%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+17.9%-2.7%+19.8%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.2%-1.4%+29.8%+15.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.3%-1.4%+30.5%+16.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.62x10.81x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$159M$5.4B$2.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$38M$9.0B$100M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$14M$196M$14.5B$2.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.46x0.74x17.33x2.59x
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $18,080 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $362 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, PLBY leads with a +27.1% total return vs TDIC's -89.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 37.2% vs TDIC's -52.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+133.7%-18.5%-3.6%-3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-89.2%+27.1%-21.0%-28.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.2%-3.8%+158.0%-38.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.2%-96.4%+80.8%-29.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.2%-84.8%+899.9%+94.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-52.4%-1.3%+37.2%-15.0%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TDIC's 2.60 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.4% from its 52-week high vs TDIC's 6.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.60x1.95x0.35x1.56x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$39.50$2.75$134.12$56.95
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.18$1.13$75.01$28.77
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+6.0%+54.5%+65.4%+61.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.550.130.354.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.3M866K38.9M950K
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PLBY as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy", PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 742.0% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 31.8% for NFLX (target: $116).

MetricTDIC logoTDICDreamland Limited…PLBY logoPLBYPlayboy, Inc.NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.PRKS logoPRKSUnited Parks & Re…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$12.63$115.59$47.60
# AnalystsCovering analysts89923
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+2.5%+1.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

TDIC vs PLBY vs NFLX vs PRKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is the stronger pick with 124.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 7x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +80. 8%, compared to -96. 4% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +899. 9% versus TDIC's -89. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares's 2. 60β — meaning TDIC is approximately 633% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 11% for Playboy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) is pulling ahead at 124.

1% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -10. 5% for Playboy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 7% for PLBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBY leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.

(PRKS) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Netflix, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 742. 0% to $12. 63.

08

Which pays a better dividend — TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is TDIC or PLBY or NFLX or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +899. 9% 10Y return). Dreamland Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (TDIC) carries a higher beta of 2. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +899. 9%, TDIC: -89. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between TDIC and PLBY and NFLX and PRKS?

These companies operate in different sectors (TDIC (Communication Services) and PLBY (Consumer Cyclical) and NFLX (Communication Services) and PRKS (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: TDIC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

TDIC

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 62%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PLBY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 42%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PRKS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform TDIC and PLBY and NFLX and PRKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(TDIC: 124.1% · PLBY: 4.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.