Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Copper
Gold
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Copper | Gold |
| Market Cap | $29.25B | $87.11B | $148.31B | $9.46B | $125.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.41B | $26.42B | $13.42B | $2.22B | $17.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.85B | $2.73B | $4.33B | $570M | $5.26B |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 27.8% | 56.7% | 32.5% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 27.8% | 52.2% | 41.4% | 49.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 22.4x | 25.4x | 15.3x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $10.39B | $11.50B | $7.41B | $1.09B | $474M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.01B | $3.35B | $4.30B | $568M | $7.65B |
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Teck Resources Limi… (TECK) | 100 | 640.1 | +540.1% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 668.2 | +568.2% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 519.7 | +419.7% |
| Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) | 100 | 883.3 | +783.3% |
| Newmont Corporation (NEM) | 100 | 194.1 | +94.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, TECK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FCX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.75 vs SCCO's 1.22
- 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.7%
SCCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 1.7%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs TECK's 6.0%
- Beta 1.78, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3.89x
- 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3%
HBM is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3%
NEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 124.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.75, Low D/E 1.4%, current ratio 1.72x
- 19.1% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
- Lower P/E (10.9x vs 15.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.9x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs FCX's 10.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.75 vs HBM's 1.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +219.0% vs FCX's +65.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs TECK's 4.1%, ROIC 38.6% vs 4.4% |
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories
SCCO leads 1 • HBM leads 1 • TECK leads 0 • FCX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCX is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.4B annually — 11.9x HBM's $2.2B. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.4B | $26.4B | $13.4B | $2.2B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.8B | $9.6B | $7.9B | $1.4B | $12.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $2.7B | $4.3B | $570M | $5.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $482M | $6.2B | $3.4B | $215M | $12.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +27.8% | +56.7% | +32.5% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +27.8% | +52.2% | +41.4% | +49.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +10.3% | +32.3% | +25.8% | +30.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +23.6% | +25.5% | +9.7% | +75.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +72.2% | +12.2% | +39.0% | +26.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +128.8% | +154.2% | +54.5% | +5.1% | -100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NEM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.3x trailing earnings, HBM trades at a 59% valuation discount to FCX's 39.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCX offers better value at 1.33x vs SCCO's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $29.3B | $87.1B | $148.3B | $9.5B | $125.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33.2B | $95.3B | $151.4B | $10.0B | $118.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 29.29x | 39.88x | 34.26x | 16.34x | 17.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.98x | 22.41x | 25.40x | 15.31x | 10.89x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.33x | 1.64x | — | 1.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.33x | 11.16x | 19.24x | 9.77x | 9.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.71x | 3.38x | 11.05x | 4.30x | 5.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.58x | 2.84x | 13.55x | 2.93x | 3.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 78.05x | 43.28x | 47.82x | 17.22x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $7 for TECK. NEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCCO's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEM scores 9/9 vs HBM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +8.9% | +42.0% | +19.2% | +15.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +4.7% | +21.4% | +9.8% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +12.8% | +38.6% | +12.0% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +12.4% | +39.2% | +11.3% | +20.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.40x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.34x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.4B | $8.1B | $3.1B | $524M | -$7.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $3.4B | $4.3B | $568M | $7.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10.4B | $11.5B | $7.4B | $1.1B | $474M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 17.68x | 19.33x | 13.44x | 50.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HBM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCCO five years ago would be worth $26,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,433 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, HBM leads with a +219.0% total return vs FCX's +65.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HBM at 65.2% vs TECK's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.7% | +17.3% | +21.4% | +18.7% | +12.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +79.8% | +65.3% | +110.5% | +219.0% | +112.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +70.7% | +151.0% | +350.8% | +142.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.8% | +44.3% | +167.4% | +159.2% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +599.3% | +507.7% | +668.4% | +552.2% | +293.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +19.5% | +35.9% | +65.2% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TECK and NEM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEM is the less volatile stock with a 0.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBM's 1.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TECK currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs SCCO's 80.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.73x | 1.79x | 1.78x | 1.91x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.97 | $70.97 | $223.89 | $28.74 | $134.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.98 | $35.15 | $85.72 | $7.42 | $48.27 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +85.4% | +80.2% | +83.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 49.1 | 54.1 | 54.0 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.9M | 15.4M | 1.6M | 5.3M | 9.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FCX and SCCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TECK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", HBM as "Buy", NEM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for NEM (target: $138) vs -56.6% for HBM (target: $10). For income investors, SCCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.65% vs TECK's 0.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $64.50 | $67.00 | $156.40 | $10.34 | $137.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 41 | 30 | 20 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% | +1.7% | +0.1% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.50 | $0.60 | $2.96 | $0.01 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.5% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
NEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SCCO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
TECK vs FCX vs SCCO vs HBM vs NEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger pick with 19.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) offers the better valuation at 16. 3x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teck Resources Limited (TECK) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
On trailing P/E, Hudbay Minerals Inc.
(HBM) is the cheapest at 16. 3x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 39. 9x. On forward P/E, Newmont Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. wins at 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
Over the past 5 years, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) delivered a total return of +167.
4%, compared to +44. 3% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +668. 4% versus NEM's +293. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
75β versus Hudbay Minerals Inc. 's 1. 91β — meaning HBM is approximately 154% more volatile than NEM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Newmont Corporation (NEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 67% for Southern Copper Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Newmont Corporation (NEM) is pulling ahead at 19.
1% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hudbay Minerals Inc. grew EPS 630. 0% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEM leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 8. 6% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 16. 5% for TECK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SCCO leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 75x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Newmont Corporation (NEM) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 4x for Southern Copper Corporation — 14. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEM: 21. 2% to $137. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM?
In this comparison, SCCO (1.
7% yield), FCX (1. 0% yield), NEM (0. 9% yield), TECK (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. HBM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is TECK or FCX or SCCO or HBM or NEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Newmont Corporation (NEM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 0. 9% yield, +293. 1% 10Y return). Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) carries a higher beta of 1. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEM: +293. 1%, HBM: +552. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TECK and FCX and SCCO and HBM and NEM?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HBM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NEM is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TECK, FCX, SCCO, NEM pay a dividend while HBM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.