Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.22B | $2.73B | $7.04B | $5.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $792M | $1.41B | $3.21B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $91M | $243M | $550M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 50.9% | 67.7% | 65.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.5% | 20.5% | 23.4% | 36.0% |
| Forward P/E | 45.6x | 10.9x | 9.7x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $4.90B | $1.82B | $4.01B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $429M | $657M | $511M | $910M |
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TFS Financial Corpo… (TFSL) | 100 | 97.7 | -2.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
TFSL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 0.05x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.76 vs COLB's 1.37
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4%
WAFD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 3.0%
- 84.4% 10Y total return vs HOMB's 58.2%
- PEG 3.55 vs TFSL's 35.11
- PEG 3.55 vs 3.55
COLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 1.37, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.22x
- 3.8% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
- +32.6% vs HOMB's -1.9%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 9.5%, EPS growth 3.6%
- NIM 3.8% vs TFSL's 1.7%
- 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | PEG 3.55 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs COLB's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% |
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories
COLB leads 2 • TFSL leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 4.1x TFSL's $792M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TFSL's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $792M | $1.4B | $3.2B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $277M | $895M | $601M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $91M | $243M | $550M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $83M | $226M | $724M | $354M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +50.9% | +67.7% | +65.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.5% | +20.5% | +23.4% | +36.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +16.0% | +17.1% | +27.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +14.8% | +22.0% | +29.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +46.3% | +5.9% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 73% valuation discount to TFSL's 47.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 4.39x vs TFSL's 36.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.2B | $2.7B | $7.0B | $5.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.7B | $3.9B | $10.5B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 47.03x | 13.56x | 12.85x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 45.61x | 10.93x | 9.65x | 10.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 36.20x | 4.41x | — | 4.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 63.11x | 12.98x | 11.76x | 10.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.33x | 1.93x | 2.19x | 3.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.22x | 0.94x | 1.12x | 1.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.50x | 13.09x | 9.97x | 12.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for TFSL. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TFSL's 2.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +8.0% | +8.4% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +3.9% | +5.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +5.7% | +2.0% | +9.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.59x | 0.60x | 0.51x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | $1.2B | $3.5B | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $429M | $657M | $511M | $910M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.9B | $1.8B | $4.0B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.24x | 0.48x | 0.82x | 1.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
COLB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,185 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +32.6% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COLB at 20.6% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.0% | +11.9% | +6.2% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +28.5% | +32.6% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.9% | +51.6% | +75.3% | +42.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.5% | +22.5% | -18.1% | +6.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.5% | +84.4% | +51.1% | +58.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.2% | +14.9% | +20.6% | +12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TFSL and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TFSL is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.81x | 1.37x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.58 | $36.12 | $32.70 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.54 | $26.31 | $21.91 | $25.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +98.8% | +90.4% | +87.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.6 | 68.3 | 60.4 | 50.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 737K | 661K | 2.7M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — COLB and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TFSL as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, COLB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.82% vs TFSL's 1.41%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $35.00 | $32.92 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 | 19 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +3.0% | +3.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 7 | 0 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.21 | $1.05 | $1.13 | $0.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.7% | +1.5% | +1.6% |
HOMB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COLB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
TFSL vs WAFD vs COLB vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger pick with 9. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus TFS Financial Corporation at 47. 0x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +22. 5%, compared to -18. 1% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WAFD returned +84. 4% versus TFSL's +37. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
76β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 81% more volatile than TFSL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 3% for TFS Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is pulling ahead at 9. 5% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 14. 3% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 11. 5% for TFS Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 14. 5% for TFSL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COLB leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus TFS Financial Corporation's 35. 11x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 45. 6x for TFS Financial Corporation — 36. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 4% for TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL).
09Is TFSL or WAFD or COLB or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TFS Financial Corporation (TFSL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 1. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TFSL: +37. 5%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between TFSL and WAFD and COLB and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: TFSL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.